Evaluation of recommender systems: A new approach

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 790-804

  Hernández del Olmo, Félix ^a   Gaudioso, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Interactive systems; Metrics; Recommender systems

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; KETONES; PAPER;

(PL) PROPERTIES; ELSEVIER (CO); ESSENTIAL FEATURE; GENERAL (CO); NEW APPROACHES; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 44949173062     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.047     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adomavicius G., and Tuzhilin A. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17 6 (2005) 734-749
2. http://www.amazon.com, January 2007.
3. Ardissono L., and Goy A. Tailoring the interaction with users in web stores. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10 4 (2000) 251-303
4. Ardissono L., Goy A., Petrone G., Segnan M., and Torasso P. Intrigue: Personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and handset devices. Applied Artificial Intelligence 8-9 17 (2003) 687-714
5. Armstrong, R., Freitag, D., Joachims, T., & Mitchell, T. (1995). Webwatcher: A learning apprentice for the world wide web. In AAAI spring symposium on information gathering (pp. 6-12).
6. Baeza-Yates R., and Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern information retrieval (1999), Addison Wesley, Essex
7. Balabanovic M., and Shoham Y. Fab: Content-based collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM 40 3 (1997) 66-72
8. Billsus D., and Pazzani M.J. Learning collaborative information filters. ICML'98: Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference on machine learning (1998), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA 46-54
9. Billsus D., and Pazzani M.J. User modeling for adaptive news access. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10 (2000) 147-180
10. Breese J., Heckerman D., and Kadie C. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, proceedings of the fourteenth conference (1998), Morgan Kaufman 43-52
11. Burke R. Hybrid recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12 4 (2002) 331-370
12. Cosley, D., Shyong, K., Istvan, A., Konstan, A., & Riedl, J. (2003). Is seeing believing? How recommender interfaces affect users' opinions. In Proceedings of CHI 2003, Florida, USA.
13. Davis, J., & Goadrich, M. (2006). The relationship between precision-recall and roc curves. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning (ICML).
14. Fisher, M. J., Fieldsend, J. E., & Everson, R. M. (2004). Precision and recall optimisation for information access tasks. In First workshop on roc analysis in AI. European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI'2004), Valencia, Spain, August.
15. Goldberg K., Roeder T., Gupta D., and Perkins C. Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Information Retrieval 4 2 (2001) 133-151
16. Haley J.A., and Mcneil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve. Radiology 143 (1982) 29-36
17. Heckerman D., Chickering D., Meek C., Rounthwaite R., and Kadie C. Dependency networks for inference, collaborative filtering, and data visualization. Journal of Machine Learning Research 1 (2001) 49-75
18. Herlocker J.L., Konstan J.A., Borchers A., and Riedl J. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. SIGIR'99: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (1999), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 230-237
19. Herlocker J.L., Konstan J.A., Terveen L.G., and Riedl J.T. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22 1 (2004) 5-53
20. Hernandez del Olmo, F., Gaudioso, E., & Boticario, J. G. (2005). Evaluating the intrusion cost of recommending in recommender systems. In User modeling 2005, 10th international conference (pp. 342-346).
21. Hill W., Stead L., Rosenstein M., and Furnas G. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. Proceedings of ACM CHI'95 conference on human factors in computing systems (1995), ACM Press 194-201
22. Linden G., Smith B., and York J. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing 07 1 (2003) 76-80
23. Mladenic, D. (1996). Personal webwatcher: Implementation and design. Technical Report IJS-DP-7472, Department of Intelligent Systems, J. Stefan Institute, Slovenia.
24. Pazzani, M. J., Muramatsu, J., & Billsus, D. (1996). Syskill&Webert: Identifying interesting web sites. In Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 54-61).
25. Pazzani M.J., Muramatsu J., and Billsus D. Learning and revising user profiles: The identification of interesting web sites. Machine Learning 27 (1997) 313-331
26. Resnick P., and Varian H.R. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM (1997)
27. Rogers S., Flechter C., and Langley P. An adaptive interactive agent for route advice. Proceedings of the third international conference on autonomous agents (Agents'99) (1999), ACM Press, Seattle, WA, USA 198-205
28. Schafer, J., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (1999). Recommender systems in e-commerce. In EC'99: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Seattle, November.
29. Schafer J., Konstan J., and Riedl J. Electronic commerce recommender applications. Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (2000) 115-152
30. Shardanand U., and Maes P. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating 'word of mouth'. CHI'95: Proceedings of the conference of human factors in computing systems (1995), ACM Press
31. Sheskin D. The handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (2003), CRC Press
32. van Rijsbergen C.J. Information retrieval (1979), Butterworth, London
33. Yao Y.Y. Measuring retrieval effectiveness based on user preference of documents. Journal of American Society in Information Sciences 46 2 (1995) 133-145