On cyberslacking: Workplace status and personal Internet use at work

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 287-292

  Garrett, R Kelly ^a   Danziger, James N ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BEHAVIOR; CYBERSLACKING; EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; INCOME; INTERNET; MALE; MANAGER; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCUPATION; PERSONAL NEEDS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WORK CAPACITY; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCES; FEMALE; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL CONFORMITY; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; WORKPLACE;

EID: 44949172648     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0146     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2006) Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys, 4th ed. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.
2. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. (2000) Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. American time use survey - 2006 results. (2005) (Press release No. USDL 07-0930). Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
4. Anandarajan M. Profiling Web usage in the workplace: a behavior-based artificial intelligence approach. Journal of Management Information Systems 2002; 19:243-66.
5. Bélanger F, Slyke CV. Abuse or learning? Communications of the ACM 2002; 45:64-5.
6. Beugré CD. (2006) Understanding dysfunctional cyberbehavior: the role of organizational justice. In: Anandarajan M, Teo T, Simmers C, eds. The Internet and workplace transformation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 223-39.
7. Bianchi SM, Milkie MA, Sayer LC, Robinson JP. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 2000; 79:191-228.
8. Bielby WT, Baron JN. Men and women at work: sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology 1986; 4:759-99.
9. Blau FD, Kahn LM. Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2000; 14:75-99.
10. Burris BH. (1993) Technocracy at work. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11. Burris BH. Computerization of the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology 1998; 24:141-57.
12. Cyberslacker. (2007) In: TechEncyclopedia from Tech-Web. www.techweb.com/encyclopedia/defineterm. jhtml?term = cyberslacker (accessed July 17, 2007).
13. Douthitt EA, Aiello JR. The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001; 86:867-74.
14. Eastin MS, Glynn CJ, Griffiths RP. (2006) Self-regulation of communication technology in the workplace. In: Anandarajan M, Teo T, Simmers C, eds. The Internet and workplace transformation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 28-40.
15. Gershuny J. (2000) Changing times: work and leisure in postindustrial society. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Gershuny J. Social leisure and home IT: a time-diary approach. IT & Society 2002; 1:54-72.
17. Hochschild ARMA. (1989) The second shift: working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
18. Lara PZM, Tacoronte DV, Ding J-MT. Do current anticyberloafing disciplinary practices have a replica in research findings? A study of the effects of coercive strategies on workplace Internet misuse. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 2006; 16:450-67.
19. Lim VKG, Teo TSH. (2006) Cyberloafing and organizational justice. In: Anandarajan M, Teo T, Simmers C, eds. The Internet and workplace transformation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 241-58.
20. Lim VKG, Teo TSH, Loo GL. How do I loaf here? Let me count the ways. Communications of the ACM 2002; 45:66-70.
21. Mahatanankoon P. (2006) Internet abuse in the workplace: extension of workplace deviance model. In: Anandarajan M, Teo T, Simmers C, eds. The Internet and workplace transformation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 15-27.
22. Mastrangelo PM, Everton W, Jolton JA. Personal use of work computers: distraction versus destruction. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2006; 9:730-41.
23. McIntosh P. (1988) White privilege and male privilege: a personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women's studies. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women (Working Paper No.189).
24. Nardi B, Whittaker S, Bradner E. (2000) Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In: CSCW-00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Philadelphia: ACM Press, pp. 79-88.
25. Oravec JA. Constructive approaches to Internet recreation in the workplace. Communications of the ACM 2002; 45:60-3.
26. Reskin B. Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology 1993; 19:241-70.
27. Simmers CA. Aligning Internet usage with business priorities. Communications of the ACM 2002; 45:71-4.
28. Stanton JM. Company profile of the frequent Internet user. Communications of the ACM 2002; 45:55-9.
29. Straub DW Jr, Nance WD. Discovering and disciplining computer abuse in organizations: a field study. MIS Quarterly 1990; 14:45-60.
30. Urbaczewski A, Jessup LM. Does electronic monitoring of employee Internet usage work? Communications of the ACM 2002; 45:80-3.
31. Wellman B, Salaff J, Dimitrova D, et al. Computer networks as social networks: collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology 1996; 22:213-38.
32. Young KS, Case CJ. Internet abuse in the workplace: new trends in risk management. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2004; 7:105-11.