Treatment of Raw Cotton Fibers with Cellulases for Nonwoven Fabrics

Textile Research Journal

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 540-548

  Verenich, Svetlana ^a   Arumugam, Karthik ^a   Shim, Eunkyoung ^a   Pourdeyhimi, Behnam ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cellulase; cotton; enzymolysis; fibers; tenacity

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; ENZYMES; HYDROLYSIS; RAW MATERIALS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; TENACITY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

CELLULASES; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; FIBER STRENGTH; RAW COTTON FIBERS;

COTTON FIBERS;

ANATOMY; CELLULOSE; COTTON; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; RAW MATERIALS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

CELLULASE TREATMENT; COTTON FIBER; ENZYMATIC TREATMENT; HYDROLYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; NONWOVEN FABRIC; RAW MATERIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRENGTH; TENSILE PROPERTY;

EID: 44949140640     PISSN: 00405175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0040517507083308     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lynd, L.R., Weimer, P.J., van Zyl, W.H., and Pretorius, I.S., Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 506-577 (2002).
2. Patra, A.K., Enzymes for Wet-processing Pretreatments, Textile Asia 9, 46-51 (2003).
3. Pedersen, G.L., Screws, G.A., and Cedroni, D.M., Biopolishing of Cellulosic Fabrics, Can. Textile J. 12, 31-35 (1992).
4. Tyndall, R.M., Application of Cellulase Enzymes to Cotton Fabrics and Garments, Textile Chem. Color. 24(6), 23-26 (1992).
5. Buschile-Diller, G., Zeronian, S.H., Pan, N., and Yoon, M.Y., Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cotton, Linen, Ramie, and Viscose Rayon Fabrics, Textile Res. J. 64, 270-279 (1994).
6. Mori, R., Haga, T., and Takagishi, T., Bending and Shear Properties of Cotton Fabrics Subjected to Cellulase Treatment, Textile Res. J. 69, 742-746 (1999).
7. Radhakrishnaiah, P., Meng, X., Huang, G., Buschle-Diller, G., and Walsh, W.K., Mechanical Agitation of Cotton Fabrics During Enzyme Treatment and its Effect on Tackle Properties, Textile Res. J. 69, 708-713 (1999).
8. Lenting, H.B.M., and Warmoeskeeken, M.M.C. G., Guidelines to Come to Minimized Tensile Strength Loss upon Cellulase Application, J. Biotechnol. 89, 227-232 (2001).
9. Kaya, F., Heitmann, Jr., J.A., and Joyce, T.W., Cellulase Binding to Cellulose Fibers in High Shear Fields, J. Biotechnol. 36, 1-10 (1994).
10. Kaya, F., Heitmann, Jr., J.A., and Joyce, T.W., Effect of Shear Fields on Hemicellulase Binding to Pulp Fibers, J. Biotechnol. 45, 23-31 (1996).
11. Azevedo, H., Bishop, D., and Cavaco-Paulo, A., Effects of Agitation Level on the Adsorption, Desorption, and Activities on Cotton Fabrics on Full Length and Core Domains of EGV (Humicola insolens) and CenA (Cellulomonas fimi), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 27, 325-329 (2000).
12. Pere, J., Puolakka, A., Nousiainen, P., and Buchert, J., Action of Purified Trichoderma reesei Cellulases on Cotton Fibers and Yarn, J. Biotechnol. 89, 247-255 (2001).
13. Mansfield, S.D., Dickson, A.R., and Sadder, J.N., Improving Paper Properties by a Selective Enzymatic Treatment of Coarse Pulp Fibers, 7th International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry, Vancouver, Canada, A189-A192 (1998).
14. Mansfield, S.D., Gilkes, N.R., Warren, R.A., and Kilburn, D.G., The Effect of Recombinant Cellulomonas fimi β-1.4-glycanases on Softwood Kraft Pulp Fibre and Paper Properties, Can. Prog. Biotechnol. 21, 301-310 (2002).
15. Linder, M., and Teeri, T.T., Roles and Function of Cellulose Binding Domains, J. Biotechnol. 57, 15-28 (1997).
16. Kumar, A., Yoon, M.-Y., and Purtell, C., Optimizing the Use of Cellulase Enzymes in Finishing Cellulosic Fabrics, Textile Chem. Color. 29(4), 37-42 (1997).
17. Cortez, J.M., Ellis, J., and Bishop, D.P., Using Cellulases to Improve the Dimensional Stability of Cellulosic Fabrics, Textile Res. J. 72, 673-680 (2002).
18. Lonsky, W.F.W., and Negri, A.R., Enzymatic Treatment of Pulp to Increase Strength, US Patent 2002/0088575 (2002).
19. Miller, G.L., Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugars, Anal. Chem. 31(3), 426-428 (1959).
20. Bradford, M.M., A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-dye Binding, Anal. Biochem. 72, 249-254 (1976).
21. Weaver, J.W., “Analytical Methods for a Textile Laboratory,” AATCC, p. 50 (1984).
22. Heinrichs, C., Dobbelstein, H., Dugal, S., and Schollmeyer, E., Determining Honeydew on Cotton - I. Use of the Formazan Method, Melliand Textilber. 10, 661-662 (1984).
23. Kleman-Leyer, K.M., Siika-Aho, M., Teeri, T.T., and Kirk, T.K., The Cellulases Endoglucanases I and Cellobiohydrolases II of Trichoderma reesei Act Synergistically to Solubilized Native Cotton Cellulose But Not to Decrease its Molecular Size, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 2883-2887 (1996).
24. Lee, I., Evans, B.R., and Woodward, J., Mechanism of Cellulase Action on Cotton Fibers: Evidence from Atomic Force Microscope, Ultramicroscopy 82, 213-221 (2000).
25. Srisodsuk, M., Kleman-Leyer, K., Keränen, S., Kirk, T.K., and Teeri, T.T., Modes of Action on Cotton and Bacterial Cellulose of a Homologous Endoglucanase-exoglucanase Pair from Trichoderma reesei, Eur. J. Biochem. 251, 885-892 (1998).
26. Buschle-Diller, G., and Zeronian, S.H., Enzymatic and Acid Hydrolysis of Cotton Cellulose After Slack and Tension Mercerization, Textile Chem. Color. 26, 17-24 (1994).