Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine: A European point of view

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 492-494

  Franchignoni, Franco ^a   Stucki, Gerold ^b   Lasa, Susana Muñoz ^c   Fialka Moser, Veronika ^d   Vanderstraeten, Guy ^e   Quittan, Michael ^f   Kullmann, Lajos ^g  

^a IRCCS   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^f KAISER FRANZ JOSEF HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^g National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; EUROPE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LETTER; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PEER REVIEW; PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICINE; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; PROCESS DESIGN; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; STANDARDIZATION; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; EDITORIAL POLICIES; EUROPE; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; PUBLISHING; REHABILITATION;

EID: 44949096497     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0211     Document Type: Letter

References (13)

1. Frontera WR, Grimby G, Basford J, Müller D, Ring H. Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 161-165.
2. Lankhorst GJ, Franchignoni F. The 'impact factor' - an explanation and its application to rehabilitation journals. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 115-118.
3. Rennie D. The present state of medical journals. Lancet 1998; 352 Suppl 2: SII 18-22
4. White book on physical and rehabilitation medicine in Europe. J Rehabil Med 2007; 45: 6-47.
5. Ring H. Domains of research, development and strategic planning in rehabilitation medicine. Eura Medicophys 2005; 41: 207-214.
6. Ring H, Aisen M, Di Benedetto P, Grabois M, Grimby G, Johnson D, et al. Publishing in peer reviewed journals: time to review the peer review! In: Soroker NN, Ring H, editors. Advances in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Bologna: Monduzzi; 2003, p. 479-488.
7. Wade D, Tennant A. An audit of the editorial process and peer review in the journal Clinical Rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 117-124.
8. Opthof T, Coronel R, Janse MJ. The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias. Cardiovasc Res 2002; 56: 339-46.
9. Scott-Lichter D, and the Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Science Editors. CSE's white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Reston, Va: CSE; 2006. Retrieved March 10, 2008. Available from: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/editorial_policies/ white_paper.cfm
10. Eysenbach G. Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biol 2006; 4: e157.
11. Reinhardt JD, Hofer P, Arenz S, Stucki G. Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part III: conceptual descriptions and domains for research. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 308-322
12. Stucki G, Cieza A, Melvin J. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 279-285.
13. Stucki G. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) - a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 773-740.