Literacy makeover: Educational research and the public interest on prime time

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1115-1146

  Lefstein, Adam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44849126434     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adey, P. (2003, April 11). Are the strategies lowering achievement? Times Educational Supplement [London].
2. Agar, M. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. London: Academic Press.
3. Allington, R. L. (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Alterman, E. (2003). What liberal media? The truth about bias and the news. New York: Basic Books.
5. Apple, M. W. (1981). Curricular form and the logic of technical control. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2, 293-319.
6. Ashley, B., Blake, Q., Fine, A., Gavin, J., Morpurgo, M., Powling, C., et al. (2005). Waiting for a Jamie Oliver: Beyond bog-standard literacy. Reading, England: National Centre for Language and Literacy.
7. Barron, P. (2005). The Newsnight mission. BBC News. Retrieved June 9, 2006, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/newsnight25/ 4198849.stm
8. Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: the hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
9. Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-15.
10. Bourdieu, P., & Ferguson, P. P. (1998). On television. New York: New Press.
11. Bozell, L. B. (2005). Weapons of mass distortion: The coming meltdown of the liberal media. New York: Three Rivers Press.
12. Briggs, C. L., & Bauman, R. (1992). Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2, 131-172.
13. Calhoun, C. J. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Cox, C. B. (1995). Cox on the battle for the English curriculum. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
15. Cunningham, J. W. (2001). The national reading panel report. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 326-335.
16. Darling, J. (1994). Child-centred education and its critics. London: P. Chapman.
17. Department of Education and Employment. (1998). NLS framework for teaching. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/ primary/publications/literacy/nls_framework/
18. Dombey, H. (1999). Towards a balanced approach to phonics teaching. Literacy, 33, 52-58.
19. Dover, C., & Hill, A. (2007). Mapping genres: Broadcaster and audience perceptions of makeover television. In D. Heller (Ed.), Reading makeover television: Realities remodelled. (pp. 23-38) London: IB Tauris.
20. Earl, L. M., & Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. (2003). Watching and learning 3: Final report of the external evaluation of England's national literacy and numeracy strategies. Nottingham, England: Great Britain Department for Education and Skills.
21. Ellis, S. (2005, September 23). Phonics is just the icing on the cake. Times Educational Supplement [London].
22. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Garnham, N. (1992). The media and the public sphere. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 359-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Gewirtz, S. (2004). Enlightening the research-policy relationship: Issues and dilemmas for educational researchers. In L. Moreno Herrera & G. Francia (Eds.), Educational policies: Implications for equity, equality and equivalence (pp. 205-220). Örebro, Sweden: Örebro University Department of Education.
25. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Cambridge, England: Polity.
26. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, England: Polity.
27. Hammersley, M. (1997). Educational research and teaching: A response to David Hargreaves' TTA lecture. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 141-161.
28. Hammersley, M. (2001). On "systematic" reviews of research literatures: A "narrative" response to Evans & Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 543-554.
29. Hammersley, M. (2003). Media representation of research: The case of a review of ethnic minority education. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 327-343.
30. Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. London: Teacher Training Agency.
31. Hargreaves, D. H. (1997). In defense of research for evidence-based teaching: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 405-419.
32. Johnston, R. S., & Watson, J. E. (2005). A seven year study of the effects of synthetic phonics teaching on reading and spelling attainment. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive, Education Department.
33. Kuper, A. (2004). Democracy beyond borders: Justice and representation in global institutions. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
34. Larson, J. (Ed.). (2001). Literacy as snake oil: Beyond the quick fix. New York: Peter Lang.
35. Lather, P. (2004). Scientific research in education: a critical perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 759-772.
36. Lefstein, A. (2005). Thinking about the technical and the personal in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 333-356.
37. Lowrey, T. M., Shrum, L. J., & McCarty, J. A. (2005). The future of television advertising. In A. J. Kimmel (Ed.), Marketing communication: New approaches, technologies, and styles (pp. 113-132). London: Oxford University Press.
38. Moseley, R. (2000). Makeover takeover on British television. Screen, 41, 299-314.
39. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
40. Oakley, A. (2002). Social science and evidence-based everything: The case of education. Educational Review, 54, 277-286.
41. Page, B. I. (1996). Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Pearson, P. D. (2004). The reading wars. Educational Policy, 18, 216-252.
43. Philips, D. (2005). Transformation scenes: The television interior makeover. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 8, 213-229.
44. Postman, N. (1982). The disappearance of childhood. New York: Delacorte Press.
45. Postman, N. (1986). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. London: Heinemann.
46. Richards, T., & King, B. (2000). An alternative to the fighting frame in news reporting. Canadian Journal of Communication, 25(4). Retrieved June 9, 2006, from http://www.cjc-online.ca/viewarticle.php?id=599
47. Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report. London: Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved June 9, 2006, from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/rosereview/finalreport/.
48. Scheuer, J. (1999). The sound bite soaety: Television and the American mind. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
49. Schudson, M. (2002). The news media as political institutions. Annual Review of Political Saence, 5, 249-269.
50. Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news. New York: Norton.
51. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
52. Snow, C., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
53. Street, B.V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
54. Torgerson, C. J., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling (Research Report No. RR711). London: Department for Education and Skills.
55. Turner, M. (1990). Sponsored reading failure: An object lesson. Warlingham, England: Independent Primary and Secondary Education Trust Education Unit.
56. Tymms, P. (2004). Are standards rising in English primary schools? British Educational Research Journal, 30, 477-494.
57. Wyse, D. (2000). Phonics: The whole story? A critical review of empirical evidence. Educational Studies, 26, 355-364.