Embracing contraries: Combining assistance and assessment in new teacher induction

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 923-953

  Yusko, Brian ^a,c   Feiman Nemser, Sharon ^b,d  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Video Technology Mentoring Program

^d Mandel Center for Studies in Jewish Education

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44849103754     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Achinstein, B., & Athaneses, S. (2005). Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Anderson, L., & Pellicer, L. (2001). Teacher peer assistance and review: A practical guide for teachers and administrators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
4. Breaux, A., & Wong, H. (2003). New teacher induction: How to train, support, and retain new teachers. Mountain View, CA: Harry Wong Publications, Inc.
5. Brock, B., & Grady, M. (1997). From first-year to first-rate: Principals guiding beginning teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
6. Brooks, D. M. (Ed.). (1987). Teacher induction: A new beginning. Papers from the National Commission on the Teacher Induction Process. Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.
7. Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
8. Carver, C. L., & Katz, D. (2004). Teaching at the boundary of acceptable practice: What is a new teacher mentor to do? Journal of Teacher Education, 55 (5), 449-462.
9. Colbert, J., & Wolff, D. (1992). Surviving in urban schools: A collaborative model for a beginning teacher support system. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 193-199.
10. Commission on Professional Support and Development for Novice Teachers. (2000). Framework for quality mentoring. In S. Odell & L. Huling (Eds.), Quality mentoring for novice teachers (pp. 15-26). Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators and Kappa Delta Pi.
11. Costa, A., & Garmston, R. (1994). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for Renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
12. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13. Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., Haselkorn, D., & Fideler, E. (1999). Teacher recruitment, selection, and induction: Policy influences on the supply and quality of teachers. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 183-232). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
14. Elbow, P. (1986). Embracing contraries: Explorations in teaching and learning. New York: Oxford.
15. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001a). Combining assistance and formative assessment: The case of the Santa Cruz New Teacher Project. Unpublished manuscript, Seattle, WA.
16. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001b). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
17. Feiman-Nemser, S., Carver, C., Katz, D., Schwüle, S., & Yusko, B. (2000). Beginning teacher induction: A study of three well-regarded programs. Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
18. Feiman-Nemser, S., Carver, C., Schwüle, S., & Yusko, B. (1999). Beyond support: Taking new teachers seriously as learners. In M. Scherer (Ed.), A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 3-12). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19. Feiman-Nemser, S., Yusko, B., Carver, C. L., & Schwüle, S. (1999). Beginning teacher induction study: Progress report. East Lansing: National Partnership on Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
20. Fideler, E., & Haselkorn, D. (1999). Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States. Boston, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
21. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
22. Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring and induction. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 548-594). New York: Macmillan.
23. Halford, J. M. (1999). Easing the way for new teachers. In M. Scherer (Ed.), A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 13-18). Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
25. Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, Michigan: The Holmes Group, Inc.
26. Huffman, G., & Leak, S. (1986). Beginning teachers' perceptions of mentors. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 22-25.
27. Huling-Austin, L. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 535-548). New York: Macmillan.
28. Ingersoll, R., & Smith, T. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30-33.
29. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing, assessment and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
30. Koppich, J. E. (2000). Peer assistance and review: Enhancing what teachers know and can do. In G. Bloom & J. Goldstein (Eds.), The peer assistance and review reader. Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center.
31. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
32. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Moir, E., & Bloom, G. (2000). New Opportunities through PAR. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 29(3), 12-13.
34. Moir, E., & Stobbe, C. (1995). Professional growth for new teachers: Support and assessment through collegial partnerships. Teacher Education Quarterly, 22(4), 83-91.
35. Moskowitz, J., & Stephens, M. (1997). From students of teaching to teachers of students: Teacher induction around the Pacific Rim. Washington, DC: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum.
36. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1994). What teachers should know and be able to do. Arlington, VA: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.
37. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
38. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
39. Odell, S. (1987). Teacher induction: Rationale and issues. In D. Brooks (Ed.), Teacher induction: A new beginning (pp. 69-80). Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.
40. Odell, S., & Huling, L. (Eds.). (2000). Quality mentoring for novice teachers. Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators.
41. Odell, S., Huling, L., & Sweeney, B. (2000). Conceptualizing quality mentoring - Background information. In S. Odell & L. Huling (Eds.), Quality mentoring for novice teachers. Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators and Kappa Delta Pi.
42. Santa Cruz New Teacher Project. (1998). Advisor handbook. Santa Cruz: Author.
43. Santa Cruz New Teacher Project. (2000). Formative assessment system. Santa Cruz, CA: Santa Cruz New Teacher Project.
44. Santa Cruz New Teacher Project. (2004). Continuum of teacher development. Unpublished manuscript, Santa Cruz, CA.
45. Smith, T., & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681-714.
46. Villani, S. (2002). Mentoring programs for new teachers: Models of induction and support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
47. Yusko, B. (2001). Combining assistance and summative assessment: Consulting teachers in Cincinnati. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.