Teaching at the boundary of acceptable practice: What is a new teacher mentor to do?

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 449-462

  Carver, Cynthia L ^a   Katz, Daniel S ^b  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SETON HALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mentors mentoring; New teacher induction; New teachers; Teacher learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 8644219545     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487104269524     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Federation of Teachers. (2001). Beginning teacher induction: The essential bridge (Educational Issues Policy Brief). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Anctil, M. (1991, April). Mentor accountability: Acting in accordance with established standards. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
3. Bartell, C. (1995). Shaping teacher induction policy in California. Teacher Education Quarterly, 22(4), 27-43.
4. Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Forum on the Education and the Economy.
5. Commission on Teacher Credentialing & California Department of Education. (1997). Standards of quality and effectiveness for beginning teacher support and assessment programs. Sacramento, CA: Author.
6. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2000). New teacher induction: Programs, policies and practices. Intro to the final report. Unpublished report, National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Education.
7. Feiman-Nemser, S., Carver, C., Schwille, S., & Yusko, B. (1999). Beyond support: Taking new teachers seriously as learners. In M. Scherer (Ed.), A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 3-12). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
8. Fideler, E. E, & Haselkorn, D. (1999). Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers, Inc.
9. Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring and induction. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548-594). New York: Macmillan.
10. Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
11. Huling-Austin, L. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 535-548). New York: Macmillan.
12. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
13. Medley, D. M., & Coker, H. (1987). The accuracy of principals' judgments of teacher performance. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 242-247.
14. National Commission for Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
15. Norman, P., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2002, April). Mind answering mind in teaching and mentoring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
16. Odell, S. J., & Huling, L. (2000). Quality mentoring for novice teachers. Washington, DC & Indianapolis, IN: Association of Teacher Educators and Kappa Delta Pi.
17. Schwille, S. A., & Wolf, N. (1995, April). Forms of mentoring practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
18. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Stanulis, R. (2003, January). Analysis of student work in the Santa Cruz New Teacher Project. Presentation at the Research on New Teacher Induction Pre-Session of the New Teacher Symposium, San Jose, CA.
20. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Yusko, B. (2001, April). Paradoxical coherence: Combination of new teacher assistance and summative assessment in the Cincinnati Peer Assistance and Evaluation Program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
22. Villani, S. (2002). Mentoring programs for new teachers: Models of induction and support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
23. Wise, A. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Bernstein, H. T., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1984). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices (A report for the National Institute of Education). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.