Learners' difficulties with quantitative units in algebraic word problems and the teacher's interpretation of those difficulties

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 269-292

  Olive, John ^a   Çağlayan, Günhan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Algebraic reasoning; Linear equations; Quantitative reasoning; Quantitative units; Representations; Units coordination

Indexed keywords

EID: 44849083621     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-007-9107-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Behr, M.J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1994). Units of quantity: A conceptual basis common to additive and multiplicative structures. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning (pp. 121-176). New York: SUNY Press.
2. Chazan, D., & Yerulshalmy, M. (2003). On appreciating the cognitive complexity of school algebra: Research on algebra learning and directions of curricular change. In J. Kilpatrick, W.G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 123-135). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
3. College Preparatory Mathematics (Algebra 1), 2nd Edition (2002). T. Salle, J. Kysh, E. Kasimatis and B. Hoey (Program Directors). Sacramento, CA: CPM Educational Program.
4. Kieran, C. & Sfard, A. (1999). Seeing through symbols: The case of equivalent expressions. Focus on Learning problems in Mathematics, 21(1), 1-17.
5. Lamon, S. (1994). Ratio and proportion: Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning (pp. 89-120). New York: SUNY Press.
6. Olive, J. (1999). From fractions to rational numbers of arithmetic: A reorganization hypothesis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1 (4), 279-314.
7. Olive, J. & Steffe, L.P. (2002). The construction of an iterative fractional scheme: The case of Joe. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 413-437.
8. Schwartz, J.L. (1988). Intensive quantity and referent transforming arithmetic operations. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 41-52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) and LEA.
9. Smith, J.P. III & Thompson, P.W. (in press). Quantitative Reasoning and the Development of Algebraic Reasoning. In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Employing children's natural powers to build algebraic reasoning in the context of elementary mathematics.
10. Steffe, L.P. (1994). Children's multiplying schemes. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 3-39). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
11. Steffe, L.P. (2002). A new hypothesis concerning children's fractional knowledge. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 1-41.
12. Tall, D., Gray, E., Ali, M.B., Crowley, L., DeMarois, P., McGowen, M., Pitta, D., Pinto, M., Thomas, M., & Yusof, Y. (2001). Symbols and the bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(1), 81-104.
13. Thompson, P.W. (1988). Quantitative concepts as a foundation for algebra. In M. Behr (Ed.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, vol. 1 (pp. 163-170). Dekalb, IL.
14. Thompson, P.W. (1989). A cognitive model of quantity-based algebraic reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AERA, San Francisco (March).
15. Thompson, P.W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(3), 165-208.
16. Thompson, P.W. (1995). Notation, convention, and quantity in elementary mathematics. In J. Sowder & B. Schapelle (Eds.), Providing a foundation for teaching middle school mathematics (pp. 199-221). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.