Corrigendum to "Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base" [Res. Policy 37 (2008) 1079-1095] (DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.003);Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base

Research Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 6-7, 2008, Pages 1079-1095

  Tether, Bruce S ^a   Tajar, Abdelouahid ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Absorptive capacity; Collaboration; Open innovation; Social capital; Specialist knowledge

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY; OPEN INNOVATION; SOCIAL CAPITAL; SPECIALIST KNOWLEDGE;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 44749092217     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (85)

1. Adler P.S., and Kwon S.W. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27 1 (2002) 17-40
2. Arora A., and Gambardella A.A. Complementarity and external linkages-the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics 38 4 (1990) 361-379
3. Asheim B., and Gertler M. The geography of innovation. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D., and Nelson R. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Bessant J., and Rush H. Building bridges for innovation-the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24 1 (1995) 97-114
5. Bettencourt L.A., Ostrom A.L., Brown S.W., and Roundtree R.I. Client co-production in Knowledge Intensive Business Services. California Management Review 44 4 (2002)
6. Borgatti S.P., and Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in networks. Management Science 49 4 (2003) 432-445
7. Brown J.S., and Duguid P. The Social Life of Information (2000), Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA
8. Brown J.S., and Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: a social practice perspective. Organization Science 12 2 (2001) 198-213
9. Cappellari L., and Jenkins S.P. Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The STATA Journal 3 3 (2003) 278-294
10. Cappellari L., and Jenkins S.P. Calculation of multivariate normal probabilities by simulation, with applications to maximum simulated likelihood estimation. The STATA Journal 6 2 (2006) 156-189
11. In: Carlsson B. (Ed). Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London
12. CBI-Qinetiq, 2006. Innovation Survey, 2005, Confederation of British Industry, London.
13. Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003), Harvard Business School Press, Harvard, MA
14. Chesbrough, H., Sphorer, J., 2006. Services Science: A Research Manifesto, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley and IBM Research. Mimeo.
15. Cohen W., and Levinthal D. Innovation and learning-the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99 397 (1989) 569-596
16. Cohen W., and Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity-a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 1 (1990) 128-152
17. Cohen W., Nelson R., and Walsh J. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 1-23
18. Coombs R., Harvey M., and Tether B.S. Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 12 6 (2003) 1125-1155
19. CST, 2003. Links between Knowledge Intensive Services and the Science-base, Council for Science and Technology, London: October (available at: http://www.cst.gov.uk/cst/reports/files/knowledge-intensive-services/services-report.pdf).
20. Czarnitzki D., and Speilkamp A. Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation. Service Industries Journal 23 2 (2003) 1-30
21. David, P.A., 1999. The Political Economy of Public Science. http://www-econ.stanford.edu/faculty/workp/swp99022.pdf.
22. den Hertog P. Knowledge intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 4 4 (2000) 491-528
23. Dodgson M., Gann D., and Salter A. The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Proctor and Gamble. R&D Management 33 3 (2006) 333-346
24. In: Edquist C. (Ed). Systems of Innovation: Technologies (1997), Institutions and Organizations, Pinter, London
25. Edquist C. Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D., and Nelson R. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
26. Gadrey J., Gallouj F., and Weinstein O. New modes of innovation: how services benefit industry. International Journal of Service Industry Management 6 3 (1995) 4-16
27. Galia F., and Legros D. Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France. Research Policy 33 8 (2004) 1185-1199
28. Gallouj F. Innovation in the Service Economy: The New Wealth of Nations (2002), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
29. Georghiou L. The United Kingdom national system of research, technology and innovation. In: Larédo P., and Mustar P. (Eds). Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy (2001), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
30. Granovetter M.S. Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 6 (1973) 1360-1380
31. Grant R.M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996) 109-122 (Winter special issue)
32. Griffith R., Harrison R., Haskel J., and Sako M. The UK Productivity Gap and the Importance of the Service Sectors, AIM Briefing Note, Advanced Institute of Management Research (2003), Said Business School, London
33. Hansen M.T. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 1 (1999) 82-111
34. Hargadon A. Firms as knowledge brokers: lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Review 40 (1998) 209-227
35. Hargadon A., and Sutton R.I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1997) 718-749
36. Howells J. Research and technology outsourcing. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 11 1 (1999) 17-29
37. Howells J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35 5 (2006) 715-728
38. Hughes T.P. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880-1930 (1983), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
39. Huston L., and Sakkab N. Connect and develop: inside Proctor and Gamble's new model of innovation. Harvard Business Review 84 3 (2006) 58+
40. Inkpen A.C., and Tsang E. Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review 30 1 (2005) 146-165
41. Katz R. Managing creative performance in R&D teams. In: Katz R. (Ed). The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation-A Collection of Readings. second ed. (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
42. Katz R., and Allen T.J. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome-a look at the performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management 12 1 (1982) 7-19
43. Katz R., and Allen T.J. Organizational issue in the introduction of new technologies. In: Katz R. (Ed). The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation-A Collection of Readings. second ed. (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York
44. Kelly T. Designing for business: consulting for innovation. Design Management Journal Summer (1999) 30-34
45. Kodama F. Technological fusion and the new research and development. Harvard Business Review 70 4 (1992) 70-78
46. Kogut B., and Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 3 (1992) 383-397
47. Kogut B., and Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science 7 5 (1996) 502-518
48. Kuusisto, J., Meyer, M., 2003. Insights into services and innovation in the knowledge intensive economy. Technology Review 134. Tekes, Helsinki.
49. Lambert, R., 2003. Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration-Final Report, HM-Treasury, London.
50. Lane P.J., Koka B.R., and Pathak S. The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review 31 4 (2006) 833-863
51. Laursen K., and Salter A. Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?. Research Policy 33 8 (2004) 1201-1215
52. Laursen K., and Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27 2 (2006) 131-150
53. In: Lundvall B.-A. (Ed). National Systems of Innovation (1992), Pinter Publishers, London
54. In: Malerba F. (Ed). Sectoral Systems of Innovation-Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
55. Malerba F. Sectoral systems: how and why innovation differs across sectors. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D., and Nelson R. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
56. Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Flanagan, K., Bilderbeek, R., den Hertog, P., Huntink, N., Bouman, M., 1995. Knowledge Intensive Business Services: Users, Carriers and Sources of Innovation, European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS) Publication Number 15.
57. Mowery D., and Sampat B. Universities in national innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D., and Nelson R. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
58. Muller E., and Zenker A. Business services as actors of knowledge intermediation: the role of KIBS in Regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy 30 9 (2001) 1501-1516
59. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). The Impact of Academic Research on Industrial Performance (Executive Summary) (2003), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
60. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). The Impact of Academic Research on Industrial Performance (Main Report) (2003), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
61. Nahapiet J., and Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 2 (1998) 242-266
62. In: Nelson R.R. (Ed). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study (1993), Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York
63. OECD, 1997. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovaiton Data-Oslo Manual, OECD (Paris), European Commission (Brussels) and Eurostat (Luxembourg).(available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/61/2367580.pdf).
64. OECD, 2003. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003-towards a knowledge-based economy, OECD, Paris.
65. Pavitt K., Robson M., and Townsend J. The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945-1983. Journal of Industrial Economics 35 3 (1987) 297-316
66. Pavitt K., Robson M., and Townsend J. Technological accumulation, diversification and organization in UK companies, 1945-1983. Management Science 35 1 (1989) 81-99
67. Portes A. Social capital: its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998) 1-24
68. Powell W., and Grodal S. Networks of innovators. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D., and Nelson R. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
69. Rosenkopf L., and Nerkar A. Beyond local search: boundary spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal 22 4 (2001) 287-306
70. Sakkab N.Y. Connect and develop complements R&D at P&G. Research and Technology Management 45 2 (2002) 38-45
71. Santoro M.D., and Chakrabarti A.K. Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy 31 7 (2002) 1163-1180
72. Stockdale, R., 2002. UK Innovation Survey, Economic Trends No. 580 March, Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/economic_trends/UK_innovation_survey.pdf.
73. Stuart T.E., and Podolny J.M. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996) 21-38
74. Sundbo J., and Gallouj F. Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services. In: Metcalfe J.S., and Miles I. (Eds). Innovation Systems in the Service Economy: Measurement and Case Study Analysis (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts
75. Teece D.J. Profiting from technological innovation-Implications for integration, collaboration, licencing and public policy. Research Policy 15 6 (1986) 285-305
76. Teece D.J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets. California Management Review 40 3 (1998) 55+
77. Tether B.S. Who cooperates for innovation and why? An empirical analysis. Research Policy 31 6 (2002) 947-967
78. Tether B.S. Do services innovate (differently)?: Insights from the European innobarometer survey. Industry and Innovation 12 2 (2005) 153-184
79. Tether, B.S., Massini, S., 2007. Services and the Innovation Infrastructure. In: Innovation in Services, DTI Occasional Paper 9. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
80. Tether B.S., and Metcalfe J.S. Services and systems of innovation. In: Malerba F. (Ed). Sectoral Systems of Innovation-Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
81. Tidd J., Bessant J., and Pavitt K. Managing innovation-integrating technological. Market and Organizational Change. 3rd Edition (2005), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
82. Tushman M.L., and Scanlan T.J. Boundary spanning individuals-their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal 24 2 (1981) 289-305
83. Von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: the impact of 'Sticky' local information. Management Science 44 5 (1998) 629-644
84. Walker W. National innovation systems: Britain. In: Nelson R.R. (Ed). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study (1993), Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York
85. Wenger E. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge