R&D intensity, value appropriation and integration patterns within organizational boundaries

Research Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 6-7, 2008, Pages 1022-1034

  Hashai, Niron ^a   Almor, Tamar ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b College of Management Academic Studies ^*  (Israel)

Author keywords

Firm specific technological knowledge; Integration; R D intensity; Value appropriation

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MARKETING; VALUE ENGINEERING;

FIRM SPECIFIC TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; VALUE APPROPRIATION;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 44749083235     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Afuah A. Dynamic boundaries of the firm: are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change?. Academy of Management Journal 44 (2001) 1211-1228
2. Almor T., and Hashai N. The competitive advantage and strategic configuration of knowledge-intensive, 'Born Global' firms: a modified resource based view. Journal of International Management 10 (2004) 479-500
3. Almor T., Hashai N., and Hirsch S. The product cycle revisited: knowledge intensity and firm internationalization. Management International Review 46 5 (2006) 655-675
4. Balconi M. Tacitness, codification of technological knowledge and the organisation of industry. Research Policy 31 3 (2002) 357-379
5. Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1991) 99-120
6. Buckley P.J., and Casson M. The Future of the Multinational Enterprise (1976), Macmillan, London
7. Buckley P.J., and Casson M. The optimal timing of a foreign direct investment. Economic Journal 91 (1981) 75-87
8. Casson M. The Economics of International Business-A New Research Agenda (2000), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
9. Central Bureau of Statistics. Israel Statistical Yearbook: Jerusalem (2007)
10. Chandler A.D. The enduring logic of industrial success. Harvard Business Review 68 2 (1990) 130-140
11. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
12. Delios A., and Henisz W.J. Political hazards, experience and sequential entry strategies: the international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980-1998. Strategic Management Journal 24 11 (2003) 1153-1164
13. Diericks I., and Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35 (1989) 1504-1513
14. Douthwaite B., Keatinge J.D.H., and Park J.R. Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption. Research Policy 30 5 (2001) 819-836
15. Dun and Bradstreet. DunsGuide Israel 2000 (2000), Dun and Bradstreet, Tel Aviv
16. Gereffi G., Humphrey J., and Sturgeon T. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12 1 (2005) 78-104
17. Hagedoorn J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993) 371-385
18. Hagedoorn J. Strategic technology partnering during the 1980s: trends, networks, and corporate patterns in non-core technologies. Research Policy 24 (1995) 207-231
19. Hennart J.F. Explaining the swollen middle: why most transactions are a mix of "market" and "hierarchy". Organization Science 4 4 (1993) 529-547
20. Hirsch S. Services and service intensity in international trade. Weltwirtschaffliches Archiv (Review of World Economics) 125 1 (1989) 45-60
21. Jones G.R., and Hill C.W.L. Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal 9 (1988) 159-172
22. Kash D.E., and Kingston W. Patents in a world of complex technologies. Science and Public Policy 28 1 (2001) 11-22
23. Katila R., and Mang P.Y. Exploiting technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations. Research Policy 32 2 (2003) 317-332
24. Kleinknecht A., and Jeroen R.O.N. Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study. Research Policy 21 4 (1992) 347-360
25. Kmenta J. Elements of Econometrics. 2nd Edition (1986), Maxwell Macmillan International Editors, New York
26. Kogut B., and Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 3 (1992) 383-397
27. Kogut B., and Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24 4 (1993) 625-646
28. Lavie D. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource based view. Academy of Management Review 31 3 (2006) 638-658
29. Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R.R., and Winter S.G. Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1987) 783-820
30. Männik K., and von Tunzlemann N. Multinational subsidiaries and innovation policy in Central and Eastern Europe: alignment and autonomy. Workshop on Multinationals Clusters and Innovation: Does Public Policy Matter? (2005), The Faculty of Economics, The University of Porto, Porto
31. Martin X., and Salomon R. Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 34 4 (2003) 356-373
32. Mol M. Does being R&D intensive still discourage outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch manufacturing. Research Policy 34 4 (2005) 571-582
33. Nicholls-Nixon C., and Woo C. Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technology change. Strategic Management Journal 24 (2003) 651-666
34. Peteraf M. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14 3 (1993) 179-191
35. Porter M.E. Competitive Advantage (1985), The Free Press, New York
36. Quinn J.B., and Hilmer F.G. Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review 35 4 (1994) 43-55
37. Rothaermel F.T. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 22 (2001) 687-699
38. Rugman A.M. Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets (1981), Columbia University Press, New York
39. Saviotti P.P. On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge. Research Policy 26 78 (1998) 843-856
40. Sorenson O., Rivkin J.W., and Fleming L. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy 35 7 (2006) 994-1033
41. Spencer J.W. Firms' knowledge sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal 24 (2003) 217-233
42. Stuart T.E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000) 791-811
43. Sturgeon T.J. Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 3 (2002) 451-496
44. Teece D.J. The market for know how and the efficient international transfer of technology. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science 458 (1981) 81-96
45. Teece D.J. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15 (1986) 285-305
46. Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (1984) 171-180
47. Williamson O.E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Applications (1975), Free Press, New York
48. Williamson O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985), Free Press, New York
49. World Bank, 2007. World Development Indicators Database.
50. Zhao H., Luo Y., and Suh T. Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: a meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies 35 6 (2004) 524-545