Plasticity comparisons between plants and animals: Concepts and mechanisms

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 367-375

  Borges, Renee M ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Electrical signaling; Genomic instability; Mechanotransduction; Phenotypic plasticity; Plant volatiles; Reactive oxygen species; ROS signaling

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 44649197066     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.3.6.5823     Document Type: Review

References (149)

1. Borges RM. Do plants and animals differ in phenotypic plasticity? J Biosci 2005; 30:41-50.
2. Grime JP. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Amer Nat 1977; 111:1169-94.
3. Grime JP, Mackey JML. The role of plasticity in resource capture by plants. Evol Ecol 2002; 16:299-307.
4. Bradshaw AD. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 1965; 13:115-55.
5. Campbell BD, Grime JP, Mackey JML. A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging. Oecologia 1991; 87:532-38.
6. Grime JP. The scale-precision trade-off in spacial resource foraging by plants: restoring perspective. Ann Bot 2007; 99:1017-21.
7. Schwinning S, Weiner J. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 1998; 113:447-55.
8. Grams TEE, Andersen CP. Competition for resources in trees: physiological versus morphological plasticity. Progr Bot 2007; 68:356-81.
9. Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gómez JM. Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 2007; 176:749-63.
10. Bonser SP, Aarssen LW. Meristem allocation: a new classification theory for adaptive strategies in herbaceous plants. Oikos 1996; 77:347-52.
11. Bonser SP, Aarssen LW. Allometry and plasticity of meristem allocation throughout development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Ecol 2001; 89:72-9.
12. Chenu K, Franck N, Dauzat J, Barczi J-F, Rey H and Lecoeur J. Integrated response of rosette organogenesis, morphogenesis and architecture to reduced incident light in Arabidopsis thaliana results in higher efficiency of light interception. Func Plant Biol 2005; 32:1123-34.
13. Puijalon S, Lena J-P, Bornette G. Interactive effects of nutrient and mechanical stresses on plant morphology. Ann Bot 2007; 100:1297-1305.
14. Vasek FC. Creosote bush: long lived clones in the Mohave Desert. Amer J Bot 1980; 67:246-55.
15. Jerling L. Are plants and animals alike? A note on evolutionary plant ecology. Oikos 1985; 45:150-53.
16. Craine JM. Reconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman. J Ecol 2005; 93:1041-52.
17. 3 photosynthesis? J Exp Bot 2006; 57:303-17.
18. Korpelainen H. Labile sex expression in plants. Biol Rev 1998; 73:157-80.
19. Munday PL, Buston PM, Warner RR. Diversity and flexibility of sex-change strategies in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 2006; 21:89-95.
20. Vizoso DB, Schärer L. Resource-dependent sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Eur Soc Evol Biol 2007; 20:1046-55.
21. Harder LD, Johnson SD. Adaptive plasticity of floral display size in animal-pollinated plants. Proc R Soc Lond B 2005; 272: 2651-57.
22. Fordyce JA. The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity. J Exp Biol 2006; 209:2377-83.
23. Blackstone NW, Bridge DM. Model systems for environmental signaling. Integr Comp Biol 2005; 45:605-14.
24. Kussell E, Leibler S. Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 2005; 309:2075-78.
25. Kashiwagi A, Urabe I, Kaneko K, Yomo T. Adaptive response of a gene network to environmental changes by fitness-induced attractor selection. PloS One 2006; 1:49. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000049.
26. Winn AA. The contributions of programmed developmental change and phenotypic plasticity to within-individual variation in leaf traits in Dicerandra linearifolia. J Evol Biol 1996; 9:737-52.
27. Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Func Ecol 2007; 21:394-407.
28. Garland T Jr, Kelly SA. Phenotypic plasticity and experimental evolution. J Exp Biol 2006; 209:2344-61.
29. Weinig C, Delph LF. Phenotypic plasticity early in life constrains developmental responses later. Evolution 2001; 55:930-36.
30. Hoverman JT, Relyea RA. How flexible is phenotypic plasticity? Developmental windows for trait induction and reversal. Ecology 2007; 88:693-705.
31. Sarkar S, Fuller T. Generalized norms of reaction for ecological developmental biology. Evol Dev 2003; 5:106-15.
32. Blackstone NW. Redox control and the evolution of multicellularity. BioEssays 2000; 22:947-53.
33. Buss LW, Blackstone NW. An experimental exploration of Waddington's epigenetic landscape. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 1991; 332:49-58.
34. Blackstone NW. Redox control in development and evolution: evidence from colonial hydroids. J Exp Biol 1999; 202:3541-53.
35. Blackstone NW. Redox signaling in the growth and development of colonial hydroids. J Exp Biol 2003; 206:651-58.
36. Blackstone NW, Kelly MM, Haridas V, Gutterman JU. Mitochondria as integrators of information in an early-evolving animal: insights from a triterpenoid metabolite. Proc R Soc Lond B 2005; 272:527-31.
37. Blackstone NW. Multicellular redox regulation: integrating organismal biology and redox chemistry. BioEssays 2005; 28:72-7.
38. Blackstone NW. A food's-eye view of the transition from basal metazoans to bilaterians. Integr Comp Biol 2007; 47:724-33.
39. Bloomfield G, Pears C. Superoxide signaling required for multicellular development of Dictyostelium. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:3387-97.
40. Nedelcu AM, Marcu O, Michod RE. Sex as a response to oxidative stress: a twofold increase in cellular reactive oxygen species activates sex genes. Proc R Soc Lond B 2004; 271:1591-96.
41. Aguirre J, Rios-Momberg M, Hewitt D, Hansberg W. Reactive oxygen species and development in microbial eukaryotes. Trends Microbiol 2005; 13:111-18.
42. Terada LS. Specificity in reactive oxidant signaling: think globally, act locally. J Cell Biol 2006; 174:615-23.
43. D'Autréaux B, Toledano MB. ROS as signaling molecules: mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:813-24.
44. Takemoto D, Tanaka A, Scott B. NADPH oxidases in fungi: diverse roles of reactive oxygen species in fungal cellular differentiation. Fungal Genet Biol 2007; 44:1065-76.
45. Lalucque H, Silar P. NADPH oxidase: an enzyme for multicellularity? Trends Microbiol 2003; 11:9-12.
46. Bedard K, Lardy B, Krause K-H. NOX family NADPH oxidases: not just in mammals. Biochimie 2007; 89:1107-12.
47. Foreman J, Demidchik A, Bothwell JHF, Mylona P, Miedema H, Torres MA, Linstead P, Costa S, Brownlee C, Jones JDG, Davies JM, Dolan L. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. Nature 2003; 422:442-45.
48. 2 and OH) by maize roots and their role in wall loosening and elongation growth. Plant Physiol 2004; 136:3114-23.
49. Gapper C, Dolan L. Control of plant development by reactive oxygen species. Plant Physiol 2006; 141:341-45.
50. Potocký M. Jones MA, Bezvoda R, Smirnoff N, Žá rský V. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase are involved in pollen tube growth. New Phytol 2007; 174:742-51.
51. 2+ channels. A signaling mechanism in polar growth, hormone transduction, stress signaling, and hypothetically mechanotransduction. Plant Physiol 2004; 135:702-8.
52. Maulik N, Das DK. Redox signaling in vascular angiogenesis. Free Rad Biol Med 2002; 33:1047-60.
53. Ushio-Fukai M, Alexander RW. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of angiogenesis signaling. Role of NAD(P)H oxidase. Mol Cell Biochem 2004; 264:85-97.
54. Phox-like regulator is recruited to control hyphal branching in a fungal-grass mutualistic symbiosis. Plant Cell 2006; 18:2807-21.
55. Schachtman DP, Shin R. Nutrient sensing and signaling: NPKS. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2007; 58:47-69.
56. Walch-Liu P, Ivanov II, Filleur S, Gan Y, Remans R, Forde BG. Nitrogen regulation of root branching. Ann Bot 2006; 875-81.
57. Ashley MK, Grant M, Grabov A. Plant responses to potassium deficiencies: a role for potassium transport proteins. J Exp Bot 2006; 57:425-36.
58. Delledonne M. NO news is good news for plants. Curr Op Plant Biol 2005; 8:390-96.
59. Lanteri ML, Graziano M, Correa-Aragunde N, Lamattina L. From cell division to organ shape: nitric oxide is involved in auxin-mediated root development. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds). Communication in plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006,123-36.
60. Zhao D-Y, Tian Q-Y, Li L-H, Zhang W-H. Nitric oxide is involved in nitrate- induced inhibition of root elongation in Zea mays. Ann Bot 2007; 100:497-503.
61. De Stefano M, Ferrarini A, Delledonne M. Nitric oxide involvement in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds). Communication in plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006; 111-21.
62. Costa S, Shaw P. 'Open minded' cells: how cells can change fate. Trends Cell Biol 2006; 17:101-6.
63. Guyomarc'h S, Bertrand C, Delarue M, Zhou D-X. Regulation of meristem activity by chromatin remodelling. Trends Plant Sci 2005; 10:332-38.
64. Scheres B. Stem-cell niches: nursery rhymes across kingdoms. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:345-54.
65. Tucker MT, Laux T. Connecting the paths in plant stem cell regulation. Trends Cell Biol 2007; 17:403-10.
66. Rando TA. Stem cells, ageing and the quest for immortality. Nature 2006; 441:1080-86.
67. Blackstone NW, Jasker BD. Phylogenetic considerations of clonality, coloniality and mode of germline development in animals. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Ecol) 2003; 297:B35-47.
68. Whitham TG. Individual trees as heterogeneous environments: adaptation to herbivory or epigenetic noise? In: Denno RF, Dingle H, (eds). Insect life history patterns: habitat and geographic variation. New York: Springer-Verlag,1981; 9-27.
69. Gill DE, Chao L, Perkins SL, Wolf JB. Genetic mosaicism in plants and clonal animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1995; 26:423-44.
70. Thomas H. Ageing in plants. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123:747-53.
71. Munné-Bosch S. Aging in perennials. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2007; 26:123-38.
72. de Kroon H, Huber H, Stuefer JF, van Groenendael JM. A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytol 2005; 166:73-82.
73. Orians C. Herbivores, vascular pathways, and systemic induction: facts and artifacts. J Chem Ecol 2005; 31:2231-42.
74. Shaish L, Abelson A, Rinkevich B. How plastic can phenotypic plasticity be? The branching coral Stylophora pistillata as a model system. PloS One 2007; 2:644. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000644.
75. Cookson SJ, Radziejwoski A, Granier C. Cell and leaf size plasticity in Arabidopsis: what is the role of endoreduplication? Plant Cell Environ 2006; 29:1273-83.
76. Jacobs T. Why do plant cells divide? Plant Cell 1997; 9:1021-29.
77. Tsukaya H. Organ shape and size: a lesson from studies of leaf morphogenesis. Curr Op Plant Biol 2003; 6:57-62.
78. Peters WS, Hagemann W, Tomos AD. What makes plants different? Principles of extracellular matrix function in 'soft' plant tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol A 2000; 125:151-67.
79. Baluška F, Volkmann D, Barlow P. Eukaryotic cells and their cell bodies: cell theory revised. Ann Bot 2004; 94:9-32.
80. Fleming AJ. The integration of cell proliferation and growth in leaf morphogenesis. J Plant Res 2006; 119:31-36.
81. Baluška F, Wojtaszek P, Volkmann D, Barlow P. The architecture of polarized cell growth: the unique status of elongating plant cells. BioEssays 2003; 25:569-76.
82. Wojtaszek P, Volkmann D, Baluska F. Polarity and cell walls. In: Lindsey K, (ed). Polarity in plants. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004:72-103.
83. Barlow P, Volkmann D, Baluška F. Polarity in roots. In: Lindsey K, (ed). Polarity in plants. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004:192-241.
84. Friml J. Auxin transport - shaping the plant. Curr Op Plant Biol 2003; 6:7-12.
85. De Smet I, Jürgens G. Patterning the axis in plants - auxin in control. Curr Op Genet Dev 2007; 17:337-43.
86. Baluška F, Hasenstein KH. Root cytoskeleton: its role in perception of and response to gravity. Planta 1997; 203:S69-78.
87. Blancaflor EB, Masson PH. Plant gravitropism. Unraveling the ups and downs of a complex process. Plant Physiol 2003; 133:1677-90.
88. Harrison BR, Masson PH. ARL2, ARG1 and PIN3 define a gravity signal transduction pathway in root statocytes. Plant J 2008; 53:380-92.
89. Telewski FW. A unified hypothesis of mechanoreception in plants. Amer J Bot 2006; 93:1466-76.
90. Ingber DE. Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:1397-408.
91. Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 1993; 260:1124-27.
92. Baluška F, Hlavačka A. Plant formins come of age: something special about cross-walls. New Phytol 2005; 168:499-503.
93. Moore, SW. Scrambled eggs: mechanical forces as ecological factors in early development. Evol Dev 2003; 51:61-6.
94. Jaffe MJ, Leopold AC, Staples RC. Thigmo responses in plants and fungi. Amer J Bot 2002; 89:375-82.
95. Braam J. In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytol 2005; 165:373-89.
96. McCormack E, Velasquez L, Delk NA, Braam J. Touch-responsive behaviors and gene expression in plants. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds). Communication in plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006; 249-60.
97. Read J, Stokes A. Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. Amer J Bot 2006; 93:1546-65.
98. Spector T, Putz FE. Biomechanical plasticity facilitates invasion of maritime forests in the southern USA by Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Biol Inv 2006; 8:255-60.
99. Roberts MR, Paul ND. Seduced by the dark side: integrating molecular and ecological perspectives on the influence of light on plant defence against pests and pathogens. New Phytol 2006; 170:677-99.
100. Inoue S, Kinoshita T, Takemiya A, Doi M, Shimazaki K. Leaf positioning of Arabidopsis in response to blue light. Mol Plant 2008; 1:15-26.
101. Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, Biondini M, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL. Remote sensing of future competitors: impacts on plant defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:7170-74.
102. Vincent G. Leaf life span plasticity in tropical seedlings grown under contrasting light regimes. Ann Bot 2006; 97:245-55.
103. Kleiman D, Aarssen LW. The leaf size/number trade-off in trees. J Ecol 2007; 95:376-82.
104. Mommer L, Visser EJW. Underwater photosynthesis in flooded terrestrial plants: a matter of leaf plasticity. Ann Bot 2005; 96:581-89.
105. Furla P, Allemand D, Shick JM, Ferrier-Pagès C, Richier S, Plantivaux A, Merle P-L, Tambutté S. The symbiotic anthozoan: a physiological chimera between alga and animal. Integr Comp Biol 2005; 45:595-604.
106. Wells CL, Pigliucci M. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: the case of heterophylly in aquatic plants. Perspect Plant Evol Ecol Syst 2000; 3:1-18.
107. Kuwabara A, Nagata T. Cellular basis of developmental plasticity observed in heterophyllous leaf formation of Ludwigia arcuata (Onagraceae). Planta 2006; 224:761-70.
108. Pierik R, Sasidharan R, Voesenek LACJ. Growth control by ethylene: adjusting phenotypes to the environment. J Plant Growth Regul 2007; 26:188-200.
109. Wyatt TD. Pheromones and animal behaviour. Communication by smell and taste. UK, Cambridge University Press 2002.
110. Baldwin IT, Halitschke R, Paschold A, von Dahl CC, Preston CA. Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: "Talking trees" in the genomics era. Science 2006; 311:812-15.
111. Heil M. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol 2007; doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02330.x.
112. Karban R, Maron J, Felton GW, Ervin G, Eichenseer H. Herbivore damage to sagebrush induces resistance in wild tobacco: evidence for eavesdropping between plants. Oikos 2003; 100:325-32.
113. Kessler A, Halitschke R, Diezel C, Baldwin I. Priming of plant defense responses in nature by airborne signaling between Artemisia tridentata and Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 2006; 148:280-92.
114. Karban R, Shiojiri K, Huntzinger, M, McCall, AC. Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: Volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication. Ecology 2006; 87:922-30.
115. Heil M, Bueno JCS. Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:5467-72.
116. Frost CJ, Appel HM, Carlson JE, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC, Schultz JC. Within-plant signalling via volatiles overcomes vascular constraints on systemic signalling and primes responses against herbivores. Ecol Lett 2007; 10:490-98.
117. Rasmann S, Köllner TG, Degenhardt J, Hiltpold I, Toepfer S, Kuhlmann U, Gershenzon J, Turlings TCJ. Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots. Nature 2005; 434:732-37.
118. Runyon JB, Mescher MC, De Moraes CM. Volatile chemical cues guide host location and host selection by parasitic plants. Science 2006; 313:1964-67.
119. Paschold A, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT. Using 'mute' plants to translate volatile signals. Plant J 2006; 45:275-91.
120. Pierik R, Visser EJW, De Kroon H, Voesenek L. Ethylene is required in tobacco to successfully compete with proximate neighbours. Plant Cell Environ 2003; 26:1229-34.
121. von Dahl CC, Baldwin IT. Deciphering the role of ethylene in plant-herbivore interactions. J Plant Growth Regul 2007; 26:201-9.
122. Adie B, Chico JM, Rubio-Somoza I, Solano R. Modulation of plant defenses by ethylene. J Plant Growth Regul 2007; 26:160-77.
123. Volkov AG. Green plants: electrochemical interfaces. J Electroanal Chem 2000; 483:150-56.
124. Davies E. Electrical signals in plants: facts and hypotheses. In: Volkov AG (ed). Plant electrophysiology - theory and methods. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006; 407-22.
125. Baluška F, Volkmann D, Hlavačka A, Mancuso S, Barlow PW. Neurobiological view of plants and their body plan. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds). Communication in plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006; 19-35.
126. Fromm J, Lautner S. Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. Plant Cell Environ 2007; 30:249-57.
127. Van Bel AJE, Ehlers K. Electrical signaling via plasmodesmata. In: Oparka KJ (ed). Plasmodesmata. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004; 263-78.
128. Maifei M, Bossi S, Spiteller D, Mithöfer A, Boland W. Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. I. Membrane potentials, intracellular calcium variations, oral secretions, and regurgitate components. Plant Physiol 2004; 134:1752-62.
129. Maischak H, Grigorieva PA, Vogela H, Boland W, Mithöfer A. Oral secretions from herbivorous lepidopteran larvae exhibit ion channel-forming activities. FEBS Lett 2007; 581:898-904.
130. Fait A, Yellin A, Fromm H. GABA and GHB neurotransmitters in plants and animals. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds). Communication in plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006; 171-85.
131. Blancaflor EB, Chapman KD. Similarities between endocannabinoid signaling in animal systems and N-acylethanolamine metabolism in plants. In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds). Communication in plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006; 206-19.
132. Lough TJ, Lucas WJ. Integrative plant biology: role of phloem long-distance macromolecular trafficking. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2006; 57:203-32.
133. Mullineaux P, Ball L, Escobar C, Karpinska B, Creissen G, Karpinski S. Are diverse signalling pathways integrated in the regulation of Arabidopsis antioxidant defence gene expression in response to excess excitation energy? Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 2000; 355:1531-40.
134. Filkowski J, Yeoman A, Kovalchuk O, Kovalchuk I. Systemic plant signal triggers genome instability. Plant J 2004; 38:1-11.
135. Schwachtje J, Minchin PEH, Jahnke S, van Dongen JT, Schittko U, Baldwin IT. SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:12935-40.
136. Sachs T. How can plants choose the most promising organs? In: Baluška F, Mancuso S, Volkmann D (eds). Communication in plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006; 53-63.
137. Neff MM, Street IH, Turk EM, Ward JM. Interaction of light and hormone signalling to mediate photomorphogenesis. In: Schäfer E, Nagy F (eds). Photomorphogenesis in plants and bacteria. Netherlands: Springer, 2006; 439-73.
138. Dumais J. Can mechanics control pattern formation in plants? Curr Op Plant Biol 2007; 10:58-62.
139. Bjedov, I. Tenaillon O, Gerard B, Souza V, Denamur E, Radman M, Taddei F, Matic I. Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Science 2003; 300:1404-09.
140. Rando OJ, Verstrepen KJ. Timescales of genetic and epigenetic inheritance. Cell 2007; 128:655-68.
141. Dong X. Pathogen-induced systemic DNA rearrangement in plants. Trends Plant Sci 2004; 9:60-1.
142. Boyko A, Kathiria P, Zemp FJ, Yao Y, Pogribny I, Kovalchuk I. Transgenerational changes in the genome stability and methylation in pathogen-infected plants (Virus-induced plant genome instability). Nuc Acid Res 2007; 35:1714-25.
143. Molinier J, Ries G, Zipfel C, Hohn B. Transgeneration memory of stress in plants. Nature 2006; 442:1046-49.
144. Schultz JC. Shared signals and the potential for phylogenetic espionage between plants and animals. Integr Comp Biol 2002; 42:454-62.
145. Schultz JC, Appel HM. Cross-kingdom cross-talk: hormones shared by plants and their insect herbivores. Ecology 2004; 85:70-7.
146. Puce S, Basile G, Bavestrello G, Bruzzone S, Cerrano C, Giovine M, Arillo A, Zocchi E. Abscisic acid signaling through cyclic ADP-ribose in hydroid regeneration. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:39783-88.
147. Bruzzone S, Moreschi I, Usai C, Guida L, Damonte G, Salis A, Scarfi S, Millo E, De Flora A, Zocchi E. Abscisic acid is an endogenous cytokine in human granulocytes with cyclic ADP-ribose as second messenger. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:5759-64.
148. Ahmad M, Galland P, Ritz T, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. Magnetic intensity affects cryptochrome-dependent responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2007; 225:615-24.
149. Stone GN, Schönrogge K. The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends Ecol Evol 2003; 18:512-22.