Allocation to reproduction and relative reproductive costs in two species of dioecious anacardiaceae with contrasting phenology

Annals of Botany

Volumn 101, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1391-1400

  Matsuyama, Shuhei ^a   Sakimoto, Michinori ^b  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Modularity; Phenology; Reproductive allocation; Reproductive cost; Rhus javanica; Rhus trichocarpa

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; COMPENSATION; DIOECY; FLOWERING; FRUITING; PHENOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE COST; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

ANACARDIACEAE; ARTICLE; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; POISON IVY; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANACARDIACEAE; FLOWERS; PLANT LEAVES; REPRODUCTION; RHUS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANACARDIACEAE; BRUCEA JAVANICA; HEDERA; TOXICODENDRON TRICHOCARPUM;

EID: 44649151077     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn048     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ågren J. 1988. Sexual differences in biomass and nutrient allocation in the dioecious Rubus chamaemorus. Ecology 69: 962-973.
2. Allen GA, Antos JA. 1988. Relative reproductive effort in males and females of the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis. Oecologia 76: 111-118.
3. Allen GA, Antos JA. 1993. Sex-ratio variation in the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis. American Naturalist 141: 537-553.
4. Antos JA, Allen GA. 1994. Biomass allocation among reproductive structures in the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis -a functional interpretation. Journal of Ecology 82: 21-29.
5. Bañuelos MJ, Obeso JR. 2004. Resource allocation in the dioecious shrub Rhamnus alpinus: the hidden costs of reproduction. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6: 397-413.
6. Bazzaz FA, Chiariello NR, Coley PD, Pitelka LF. 1987. Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. BioScience 37: 58-67.
7. Bram MR, Quinn JA. 2000. Sex expression, sex-specific traits, and the effects of salinity on growth and reproduction of Amaranthus cannabinus (Amaranthaceae), a dioecious annual. American Journal of Botany 87: 1609-1618.
8. Cipollini ML, Stiles EW. 1991. Costs of reproduction in Nyssa sylvatica - sexual dimorphism in reproductive frequency and nutrient flux. Oecologia 86: 585-593.
9. Cipollini ML, Whigham DF. 1994. Sexual dimorphism and cost of reproduction in the dioecious shrub Lindera benzoin (Lauraceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 65-75.
10. Conn JS, Blum U. 1981. Differentiation between the sexes of Rumex hastatulus in net energy allocation, flowering and height. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 108: 446-455.
11. Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR. 1993. Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in boxelder, Acer negundo. Ecology 74: 798-815.
12. Delph LF. 1990. Sex-differential resource-allocation patterns in the subdioecious shrub Hebe subalpina. Ecology 71: 1342-1351.
13. Delph LF. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in life history. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. New York: Springer-Verlag, 149-173.
14. Diggle PK. 1999. Heteroblasty and the evolution of flowering phenologies. International Journal of Plant Science 160: S123-S134.
15. Hirayama K, Sakimoto M. 2003. Regeneration of Cryptomeria japonica on a sloping topography in a cool-temperate mixed forest in the snowy region of Japan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 543-551.
16. Hoffmann AJ, Alliende MC. 1984. Interactions in the patterns of vegetative growth and reproduction in woody dioecious plants. Oecologia 61: 109-114.
17. Iwasa Y, Cohen D. 1989. Optimal growth schedule of a perennial plant. American Naturalist 133: 480-505.
18. de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of plant reproductive strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kato M, Kakutani T, Inoue T, Itino T. 1990. Insect-flower relationship in the primary beech forest of Ashu, Kyoto: an overview of the flowering phenology and the seasonal pattern of insect visits. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University 27: 309-375.
20. Klinkhamer PGL, Kubo T, Iwasa Y. 1997. Herbivores and the evolution of the semelparous perennial life-history of plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10: 529-550.
21. Korpelainen H. 1992. Patterns of resource-allocation in male and female plants of Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella. Oecologia 89: 133-139.
22. Kudo G. 2006. Flowering phenologies of animal-pollinated plants: reproductive strategies and agents of selection. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH, eds. Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139-158.
23. Kyoto University Field Science Education Research Center. 2007. The 14th Meteorological observations in the Kyoto University Forests. Kyoto: Field Science Education Research Center of Kyoto University (in Japanese).
24. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1977. Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43: 177-216.
25. Lovett-Doust J, Lovett-Doust L. 1988. Modules of production and reproduction in a dioecious clonal shrub, Rhus typhina. Ecology 69: 741-750.
26. Milla R, Castro-Diez P, Maestro-Martinez M, Montserrat-Marti G. 2006. Costs of reproduction as related to the timing of phenological phases in the dioecious shrub Pistacia lentiscus L. Plant Biology 8: 103-111.
27. Mitchell MGE, Antos JA, Allen GA. 2004. Modules of reproduction in females of the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 393-400.
28. Miyazaki Y, Hiura T, Kato E, Funada R. 2002. Allocation of resources to reproduction in Styrax obassia in a masting year. Annals of Botany 89: 767-772.
29. Nicotra AB. 1999. Reproductive allocation and the long-term costs of reproduction in Siparuna grandiflora, a dioecious neotropical shrub. Journal of Ecology 87: 138-149.
30. Obeso JR. 1997. Costs of reproduction in Ilex aquifolium: effects at tree, branch and leaf levels. Journal of Ecology 85: 159-166.
31. Obeso JR. 1998. Effects of defoliation and girdling on fruit production in Ilex aquifolium. Functional Ecology 12: 486-491.
32. Obeso JR. 2002. The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist 155: 321-348.
33. Obeso JR, Alvarez-Santullano M, Retuerto R. 1998. Sex ratio, size distributions, and sexual dimorphism in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium (Aquifoliaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 1602-1608.
34. Ohwi J, Kitagawa M. 1992. New flora of Japan. Tokyo: Shibundo (in Japanese).
35. Oyama K. 1990. Variation in growth and reproduction in the neotropical dioecious palm Chamaedorea tepejilote. Journal of Ecology 78: 648-663.
36. Popp JW, Reinartz JA. 1988. Sexual dimorphism in biomass allocation and clonal growth of Xanthoxylum americanum. American Journal of Botany 75: 1732-1741.
37. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
38. Rocheleau AF, Houle G. 2001. Different cost of reproduction for the males and females of the rare dioecious shrub Corema conradii (Empetraceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 659-666.
39. Sakai AK, Burris TA. 1985. Growth in male and female aspen clones - a 25-year longitudinal study. Ecology 66: 1921-1927.
40. Shitaka Y, Hirose T. 1998. Effects of shift in flowering time on the reproductive output of Xanthium canadense in a seasonal environment. Oecologia 114: 361-367.
41. Sprugel DG, Hinckley TM, Schaap W. 1991. The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 309-334.
42. Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Berlin: Springer.
43. Watson MA, Casper BB. 1984. Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 233-258.
44. White J. 1979. The plant as a metapopulation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 109-145.
45. Willson MF. 1983. Plant reproductive ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.