Collagen scaffolds implanted in the palatal mucosa

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 599-608

  Jansen, Richard G ^a   Kuijpers Jagtman, Anne M ^a   Van Kuppevelt, Toin H ^a   Von Den Hoff, Johannes W ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Animal model; Biocompatibility; Collagen; In vivo test; Scaffold; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CHEEK MUCOSA; CLEFT PALATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFLAMMATION; MALE; MYOFIBROBLAST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SCAR FORMATION; VASCULARIZATION; WISTAR RAT; WOUND HEALING;

ACTINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CICATRIX; COLLAGEN TYPE I; FIBRILLAR COLLAGENS; FIBROBLASTS; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MALE; MOUTH MUCOSA; MUSCLE CELLS; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; PALATE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 44649117559     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31816aaaad     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Murray JC. Face facts - genes, environment, and clefts. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:227-232
2. Wijdeveld MG, Grupping EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, et al. Wound healing of the palatal mucoperiosteum in beagle dogs after surgery at different ages. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1987;5:51-57
3. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Misaki K, et al. Scar tissue distribution on palates and its relation to maxillary dental arch form. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:313-319
4. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:5-77
5. Liao YF, Mars M. Long-term effects of palate repair on craniofacial morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:594-600
6. Pieper JS, Hafmans T, van Wachem PB, et al. Loading of collagen-heparan sulfate matrices with bFGF promotes angiogenesis and tissue generation in rats. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:185-194
7. Ruszczak Z, Friess W. Collagen as a carrier for on-site delivery of antibacterial drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2003;55:1679-1698
8. Klopper PJ. Collagen in surgical research. Eur Surg Res 1986;18:218-223
9. DeLustro F, Smith ST, Sundsmo J, et al. Reaction to injectable collagen: results in animal models and clinical use. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;79:581-594
10. Keefe J, Wauk L, Chu S, et al. Clinical use of injectable bovine collagen: a decade of experience. Clin Mater 1992;9:155-162
11. Piez KA. Biosynthesis of alpha chains of collagen. J Cell Phys 1970;76:389-398
12. McPherson JM, Wallace DG, Sawamura SJ, et al. Collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: a characterization of fibril quality as a function of assembly conditions. Coll Relat Res 1985;5:119-135
13. Pieper JS, van Wachem PB, van Luyn MJA, et al. Attachment of glycosaminoglycans to collagenous matrices modulates the tissue response in rats. Biomaterials 2000;21:1689-1699
14. Mikos AG, McIntire LV, Anderson JM, et al. Host response to tissue engineered devices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1998;33:111-139
15. HardinYoung J, Carr RM, Downing GJ, et al. Modification of native collagen reduces antigenicity but preserves cell compatibility. Biotechnol Bioeng 1996;49:675-682
16. Shoshan S, Riebenfeld U, Neuman Z. Effect of enriched collagen solutions on scar formation in 3rd-degree burns in animals after early surgical excision of slough. Burns 1977;3:153-165
17. de Vries HJ, Zeegelaar JE, Middelkoop E, et al. Reduced wound contraction and scar formation in punch biopsy wounds. Native collagen dermal substitutes. A clinical study. Br J Dermatol 1995;132:690-697
18. Lee HG, Eun HC. Differences between fibroblasts cultured from oral mucosa and normal skin: implication to wound healing. J Dermatol Sci 1999;21:176-182
19. Stephens P, Davies KJ, Occleston N, et al. Skin and oral fibroblasts exhibit phenotypic differences in extracellular matrix reorganization and matrix metalloproteinase activity. Br J Dermatol 2001;144:229-237
20. Stephens P, Davies KJ, Al-Khateeb T, et al. A comparison of the ability of intra oral and extra oral fibroblasts to stimulate extracellular matrix reorganization in a model of wound contraction. J Dent Res 1996;75:1358-1364
21. Okazaki M, Yoshimura K, Uchida G, et al. Elevated expression of hepatocyte and keratinocyte growth factor in cultured buccal-mucosa-derived fibroblasts compared with normal-skin-derived fibroblasts. J Dermatol Sci 2002;30:108-115
22. Sciubba JJ, Waterhouse JP, Meyer J. Fine-structural comparison of healing of incisional wounds of mucosa and skin. J Oral Pathol Med 1978;7:214-226
23. Hakkinen L, Uitto VJ, Larjava H. Cell biology of gingival wound healing. Periodontol 2000 2000;24:127-152
24. Nooh N, Graves DT. Healing is delayed in oral compared to dermal excisional wounds. J Periodontol 2003;74:242-246
25. van Beurden HE, Von den Hoff JW, Torensma R, et al. Myofibroblasts in palatal wound healing: prospects for the reduction of wound contraction after cleft palate repair. J Dent Res 2005;84:871-880
26. Wijdeveld MG, Maltha JC, Grupping EM, et al. A histological study of tissue response to simulated cleft palate surgery at different ages in beagle dogs. Arch Oral Biol 1991;36:837-843
27. Fujioka M, Fujii T. Maxillary growth following atelocollagen implantation on mucoperiosteal denudation of the palatal process in young rabbits: implications for clinical cleft palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:297-308
28. Pieper JS, Oosterhof A, Dijkstra PJ, et al. Preparation and characterization of porous crosslinked collagenous matrices containing bioavailable chondroitin sulphate. Biomaterials 1999;20:847-858
29. Damoiseaux JG, Dopp EA, Calame W, et al. Rat macrophage lysosomal membrane antigen recognized by monoclonal antibody ED1. Immunology 1994;83:140-147
30. Szpaderska AM, Zuckerman JD, DiPietro LA. Differential injury responses in oral mucosal and cutaneous wounds. J Dent Res 2003;82:621-626
31. Bodner L, Dayan D. Epithelium and connective tissue regeneration during palatal wound healing in desalivated rats - a comparative study. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 1995;111:415-419
32. Minabe M, Kodama T, Hori T, et al. Effects of atelocollagen on the wound-healing reaction following palatal gingivectomy in rats. J Periodontal Res 1989;24:178-185
33. Cornelissen AM, Stoop R, Von den Hoff HW, et al. Myofibroblasts and matrix components in healing palatal wounds in the rat. J Oral Pathol Med 2000;29:1-7
34. Cornelissen AM, Maltha JC, Von den Hoff HW, et al. Palatal mucoperiosteal wound healing in the rat. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:344-351
35. Leenstra TS, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Maltha JC. The healing process of palatal tissues after palatal surgery with and without implantation of membranes: an experimental study in dogs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:249-255
36. In de Braekt MM, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Poly-(L-lactic) acid membranes in palatal surgery in beagle dogs: clinical and histologic evaluation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995;32:290-298
37. Minuth WW, Sittinger M, Kloth S. Tissue engineering: generation of differentiated artificial tissues for biomedical applications. Cell Tissue Res 1998;291:1-11
38. Bergsma EJ, Rozema FR, Bos RRM, et al. Foreign-body reactions to resorbable poly(l-lactide) bone plates and screws used for the fixation of unstable zygomatic fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:666-670
39. Chang C, Houck JC. Demonstration of the chemotactic properties of collagen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1970;134:22-26
40. Houck J, Chang C. The chemotactic properties of the products of collagenolysis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1971;138:69-75
41. Postlethwaite AE, Seyer JM, Kang AH. Chemotactic attraction of human fibroblasts to type I, II, and III collagens and collagen-derived peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978;75:871-875
42. Minabe M, Kodama T, Kogou T, et al. Different cross-linked types of collagen implanted in rat palatal gingiva. J Periodontol 1989;60:35-43
43. Harriger MD, Supp AP, Warden GD, et al. Glutaraldehyde crosslinking of collagen substrates inhibits degradation in skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;35:137-145
44. Weadock K, Olson RM, Silver FH. Evaluation of collagen crosslinking techniques. Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs 1983;11:293-318
45. Stegman SJ. Injectable collagen. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:866
46. Kligman AM, Armstrong RC. Histologic response to intradermal zyderm and zyplast (glutaraldehyde cross-linked) collagen in humans. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1986;12:351-357
47. Ophof R,Maltha JC, Von den Hoff JW, et al. Histologic evaluation of skin-derived and collagen-based substrates implanted in palatal wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2004;12:528-538
48. Gabbiani G. The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J Pathol 2003;200:500-503
49. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, et al. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002;3:349-363
50. Dabelsteen E, Kremenak CR. Demonstration of actin in fibroblasts of healing palatal wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;62:429-435
51. Greenhalgh DG. The role of apoptosis in wound healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1998;30:1019-1030
52. Huang NF, Zac-Varghese S, Luke S. Apoptosis in skin wound healing. Wounds 2003;15:182-194