Visual judgment of similarity across shape transformations: Evidence for a compositional model of articulated objects

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 331-338

  Barenholtz, Elan ^a   Tarr, Michael J ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Articulation; Biological motion; Invariance; Shape perception; Visual perception; Visual recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECOGNITION; ROTATION; VISION;

FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROTATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 44549087814     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arguin M., and Saumier D. Independent processing of parts and their spatial organization in complex objects. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 629-633
2. Attneave F. Multistability in perception. Scientific American 225 (1971) 62-71
3. Barenholtz E., and Feldman J. Visual comparisons within and between object-parts: evidence for a single- part superiority effect. Vision Research 43 (2003) 1655-1666
4. Barenholtz E., and Feldman J. Determination of visual figure and ground in dynamically deforming shapes. Cognition 101 (2006) 530-544
5. Barenholtz E., and Tarr M.J. Reconsidering the role of structure in vision. In: Markman A., and Ross B. (Eds). Categories in use series: The psychology of learning and motivation 47 (2007), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 157-180
6. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 115-147
7. DeWinter J., and Wagemans J. Segmentation of object outlines into parts: A large-scale, integrative study. Cognition 99 (2006) 275-325
8. Edelman S. Representing three-dimensional objects by sets of activities of receptive fields. Biological Cybernetics 70 (1993) 37-45
9. Hummel J.E., and Stankiewicz B.J. Categorical relations in shape perception. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 201-236
10. Hoffman D.D., and Richards W.A. Parts of recognition. Cognition 18 (1984) 65-96
11. Huttenlocher D.P., and Ullman S. Recognizing solid objects by alignment with an image. International Journal of Computer Vision 5 (1990) 195-212
12. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 14 (1973) 201-211
13. Keane S., Hayward W.G., and Burke D. Detection of three types of changes to novel objects. Visual Cognition 10 (2003) 101-127
14. Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J., Maurer D., and Brent H.P. Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing. Nature 410 (2001) 890
15. Marr D., and Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences 200 (1978) 269-294
16. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 1019-1025
17. Riesenhuber M., Jarudi I., Gilad S., and Sinha P. Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences 271 (2004) 448-450
18. Saiki J., and Hummel J.E. Connectedness and part-relation integration in shape category learning. Memory and Cognition 26 (1998) 1138-1156
19. Tanaka J.W., and Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A (1993) 225-245
20. Tarr M.J., and Bülthoff H.H. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views-Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 71-86
21. Ullman S., Vidal-Naquet M., and Sali E. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 682-687
22. Vanrie J., Willems B., and Wagemans J. Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: Mental rotation versus invariant features. Perception 30 (2001) 1047-1056
23. Wagemans J., van Gool L., Lamote C., and Foster D.H. Minimal information to determine affine shape equivalence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 443-468
24. Wallis G., and Rolls E.T. Invariant face and object recognition in the visual system. Progress in Neurobiology 51 (1997) 167-194
25. Yovel G., and Duchaine B. Specialized face perception mechanisms extract both part and spacing information: Evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006) 580-593
26. Zhang L., and Cottrell G.W. Holistic processing develops because it is good. In: Bara B.G., Barsalou L., and Bucciarelli M. (Eds). Proceedings of the 27th annual cognitive science conference (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 2428-2433