Connectedness and part-relation integration in shape category learning

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1138-1156

  Saiki, Jun ^a   Hummel, John E ^b  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION;

EID: 0031793558     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03201191     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ASHBY, F. G., & MADDOX, W. T. (1994). A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 423-466.
2. BARRETT, S. E., & SHEPP, B. E. (1988). Developmental changes in attentional skills: The effect of irrelevant variations on encoding and response selection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 382-399.
3. BARSALOU, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
5. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1995). One-sided edge assignment in vision: 1. Figure-ground segmentation and attention to objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 140-146.
6. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
7. CAVE, C. B., BOST, P. R., & COBB, R. E. (1996). Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 639-653.
8. COOPER, E. E., BIEDERMAN, I., & HUMMEL, J. E. (1992). Metric invariance in object recognition: A review and further evidence. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 191-214.
9. DONNELLEY, N., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1991). Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 561-570.
10. ELDER, J., & ZUCKER, S. (1993). The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes. Vision Research, 33, 981-991.
11. ENNS, J. T. (1992). Sensitivity of early human vision to 3-D orientation in line-drawings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 143-169.
12. FELFOLDY, G. L. (1974). Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 453-459.
13. FODOR, J. A., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. In S. Pinker & J. Mehler (Eds.) Connections and symbols (pp. 3-71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. GARNER, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. GLUCK, M. A., & BOWER, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 117, 227-247.
16. GRAU, J. W., & KEMLER NELSON, D. G. (1988). The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: Evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 347-370.
17. HOLYOAK, K. J., & HUMMEL, J. E. (in press). The proper treatment of symbols in connectionism. In E. Dietrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. HUMMEL, J. E. (in press). Where view-based theories break down: The role of structure in shape perception and object recognition. In E. Dietrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
19. HUMMEL, J. E., & BIEDERMAN, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
20. HUMMEL, J. E., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
21. HUMMEL, J. E., & SAIKI, J. (1993). Rapid unsupervised learning of object structural descriptions. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 569-574). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. HUMMEL, J. E., & STANKIEWICZ, B. J. (1996). An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 93-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. HUMPHREYS, G. V., & BRUCE, V. (1989). Visual cognition. London: Erlbaum.
24. HUNT, S. (1993). MacProbe [Computer program]. Los Angeles: Aristometrics.
25. KEMLER NELSON, D. G. (1993). Processing integral dimensions: The whole view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1105-1113.
26. KIMCHI, R., & PALMER, S. E. (1985). Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psycholoy: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 673-688.
27. KNOWLTON, B. J., & SQUIRE, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 169-181.
28. KNOWLTON, B. J., SQUIRE, L. R., & GLUCK, M. A. (1994). Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia. Learning & Memory, 1, 106-120.
29. LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1966). Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 95-104.
30. LOWE, D. G. (1987). The viewpoint consistency constraint. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 57-72.
31. MARR, D., & NISHIHARA, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 200, 269-294.
32. MARSOLEK, C. J. (1995). Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 375-386.
33. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
34. PALMER, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 436-447.
35. PALMER, S. E., & ROCK, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
36. PETERSON, M. A., & GIBSON, B. S. (1994). Must figure-ground organization precede object recognition? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 5, 253-259.
37. POMERANTZ, J. R., & PRISTACH, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 635-649.
38. ROSCH, E., MERVIS, C. B., GRAY, W. D., JOHNSON, D. M., & BOYES-BRAEM, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
39. SAIKI, J., & HUMMEL, J. E. (1996). Attribute conjunctions and the part configuration advantage in object category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 22, 1002-1019.
40. SAIKI, J., & HUMMEL, J. E. (1998). Connectedness and the part-relation integration in object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 227-251.
41. SHEPP, B. E., & BARRETT, S. E. (1991). The development of perceived structure and attention: Evidence from divided and selective attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 434-458.
42. SRINIVAS, K. (1995). The representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1019-1036.
43. SRINIVAS, K. (1996). Contrast and illumination effects on explicit and implicit measures of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1123-1135.