Using semantic feature analysis to improve contextual discourse in adults with aphasia

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 161-172

  Rider, Jill Davis ^a   Wright, Heather Harris ^b   Marshall, Robert C ^a   Page, Judith L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Discourse; Treatment; Word retrieval

Indexed keywords

EID: 44449154312     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/016)     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Boyle, M. (2001). Semantic feature analysis: The evidence for treating lexical impairments in aphasia. Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 11(2), 23-28.
2. Boyle, M. (2004). Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 236-249.
3. Boyle, M., & Coelho, C. A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 94-98.
4. Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. (1992). Meta-analysis for single case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Coelho, C. A., McHugh, R. E., & Boyle, M. (2000). Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication. Aphasiology, 14, 133-142.
6. Conley, A., & Coelho, C. A. (2003). Treatment of word retrieval impairment in chronic Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology, 17, 203-211.
7. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (2001). The Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
8. Goodglass, H., & Wingfield, A. (Eds.) (1997). Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Haarbauer-Krupa, J., Moser, L., Smith, G., Sullivan, D. M., & Szekeres, S. F. (1985). Cognitive rehabilitation therapy: Middle stages of recovery. In M. Ylvisaker (Ed.), Head injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (pp. 287-310). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
10. Hillis, A. E. (1989). Efficacy and generalization of treatment for aphasic naming errors. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 70, 626-632.
11. Hopper, T., Holland, A., & Rewenga, M. (2002). Conversational coaching: Treatment outcomes and future directions. Aphasiology, 16, 745-761.
12. Kearns, K. P. (1985). Response elaboration training for patient initiated utterances. Clinical Aphasiology, 15, 196-204.
13. Kertesz, A. (1982). The Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune and Stratton.
14. Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 608-622.
15. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
16. LaPointe, L., & Horner, J. (1998). Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia, Second Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
17. Lowell, S., Beeson, P. M., & Holland, A. L. (1995). The efficacy of a semantic cueing procedure on naming procedure of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 109-114.
18. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. E. (1990). The Child Language Data Exchange System: An update. Journal of Child Language, 17, 457-472.
20. Maher, L. M., & Raymer, A. M. (2004). Management of anomia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 10-21.
21. Malvern, D. D., & Richards, B. J. (1997). A new measure of lexical diversity. In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving models of language (pp. 58-71). Clevedon, England: Mulilingual Matters.
22. Massaro, M., & Thompkins, C. (1994). Feature analysis for treatment of communication disorders in traumatically brain-injured patients: An efficacy study. Clinical Aphasiology, 22, 245-256.
23. McKee, G., Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2000). Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 15, 323-337.
24. Nicholas, L. L., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338-350.
25. Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16, 935-979.
26. Nickels, L., & Best, W. (1996a). Therapy for naming deficits (Part 1 ). Principles, puzzles, and progress. Aphasiology, 10, 21-47.
27. Nickels, L., & Best, W. (1996b). Therapy for naming deficits (Part 2): Specifics, surprises, and suggestions. Aphasiology, 10, 109-136.
28. Rayner, H., & Marshall, J. (2003). Training volunteers as conversation partners for people with aphasia. International Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38, 149-164.
29. Robey, R. R., & Beeson, P. M. (2005, November). Aphasia treatment: Examining the evidence. Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego, CA.
30. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agree-ment, familiarity, and complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
31. Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1989). Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Tripodi, T. (1994). A primer on single-subject design for clinical social workers. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
33. Tryon, W. W. (1982). A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 423-429.
34. Webber, T., & Webber, S. (2003). Webber's jumbo articulation drill book on CD-ROM. Greenville, SC: Super Duper.
35. Wright, H. H., Silverman, S. W., & Newhoff, M. (2003). Measures of lexical diversity in aphasia. Aphasiology, 17, 443-452.