Agronomic performance of different pea cultivars under various sowing periods and contrasting soil structures

Agronomy Journal

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 748-759

  Vocanson, Aurélie ^a   Jeuffroy, Marie Hélène ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPACTION; CROPS; SOILS;

ABIOTIC STRESS; PEA CULTIVARS; SOIL STRUCTURES;

AGRONOMY;

PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 44449101806     PISSN: 00021962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0301     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., P. Vargas-Vazquez, and J.W. White. 1996. Effect of sowing date on the growth and seed yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in highland environments. Field Crops Res. 49:1-10.
2. ARVALIS-Institut du végétal. 2003. Pois protéagineux de printemps et d'hiver: Guide de culture. (In French.) ARVALIS, Paris.
3. Bengough, A.G., and C.E. Mullins. 1990. Mechanical impedance to root growth: A review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J. Soil Sci. 41:341-358.
4. Biarnès, V., I. Chaillet, and B. Carrouée. 2004. Frost damages observed on winter grain legumes in France in 2003. p. 295. In AEP-INRA (ed.) Proc. 5th European Conf. on Grain Legumes. Dijon, France. 7-11 June 2004. AEP, Paris.
5. Bourion, V., M. Duparque, I. Lejeune-Hénaut, and N.G. Munier.-Jolain. 2002. Criteria for selecting productive and stable pea cultivars. Euphytica 126:391-399.
6. Brisson, N., B. Seguin, and P. Bertuzzi. 1992. Agrometeorological soil water balance for crop simulation models. Agric. For. Meteorol. 59:267-287.
7. Chaillet, I., and V. Biarnès. 2004. Technical proceedings: Determination of development stages. p. 58-63, In V. Biarnès et al. (ed.) Agrophysiologie du pois protéagineux. (In French.) INRA-ARVALIS, Paris.
8. 2 fixation and incorporation of combined N from soil into pea crop: Effects of soil compaction and water regime. p. 141-142, In A. Scaife (ed.) Proc. 1st European Conf. on Grain Legumes. Angers, France. 5-7 Dec. 1990. ESA, Colmar, France.
9. Crozat, Y., J.P. Gillet, and F. Tricot. 1991. Effects of the soil compaction on root distribution N, P, K uptakes and growth of pea crop. In Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. of the Soc. of Root Res. Vienna, Austria. 2-6 Sept. 1991.
10. Dawkins, T.C.K., M. McGowan, P.D. Hebblethwaite, and J.C. Brereton. 1984. The effect of thorough subsoil loosening on the yield of peas (1980) and a subsequent crop of winter wheat (1981). Res. Dev. Agric. 1:53-57.
11. Doré, T. 1992. Analyse, par voie d'enquête, de la variabilité des rendements et des effets précédents du pois protéagineux de printemps (Pisum sativum L.). (In French.) INA, Paris-Grignon, France.
12. Doré, T., J.M. Meynard, and M. Sebillotte. 1998. The role of grain number, nitrogen nutrition and stem number in limiting pea crops (Pisum sativum L.) yields under agricultural conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 8:29-37.
13. Dumoulin, V., B. Ney, and G. Eteve. 1994. Variability of seed and plant development in pea. Crop Sci. 34:992-998.
14. Egli, D.B. 1993. Cutivar maturity and potential yield of soybean. Field Crops Res. 32:147-158.
15. Etévé, G., M. Boilleau, J.J. Stempniak, R. Devaux, and I. Lejeune. 2004. Breeding winter peas: Toward a new backround. p. 128. In AEP-INRA (ed.) Proc. 5th European Conf. on Grain Legumes. Dijon, France. 7-11 June 2004. AEP, Paris.
16. Gesch, R.W., F. Forcella, N. Barbour, B. Phillips, and W.B. Voorheees. 2002. Yield and growth response of Cuphea to sowing date. Crop Sci. 42:1959-1965.
17. Gosse, G., C. Varlet-Grancher, R. Bonhomme, M. Chartier, J.M. Allirand, and G. Lemaire. 1986. Maximum dry matter production and solar radiation intercepted by a canopy. (In French, with English abstract.) Agronomie 6:47-56.
18. Guilioni, L. 1997. Effet des hautes températures sur la croissance végétative et le développement des organes reproducteurs chez le pois (Pisum sativum L., cv. 'Messire'). Conséquences sur la production de biomasse et le nombre de graines. (In French.) ENSA de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
19. Guilioni, L., and M.H. Jeuffroy. 2005. Fortes températures et fonctionnement d'un couvert de pois. (In French.) p. 164-173. In V. Biarnès et al. (ed.) Agrophysiologie du pois protéagineux. INRA-Arvalis, Paris.
20. Guilioni, L., J. Wéry, and J. Lecoeur. 2003. High temperature and water deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing plant growth rate. Funct. Plant Biol. 30:1151-1164.
21. Heenan, D.P. 1994. Effects of sowing time on growth and grain yields of lupin and field pea in south eastern New South Wales. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 34:1137-1142.
22. Jeuffroy, M.H., C. Duthion, J.M. Meynard, and A. Pigeaire. 1990. Effect of a short period of high day temperatures during flowering on the seed number per pod of pea (Pisum sativum L.). (In French, with English abstract). Agronomie 10:139-145.
23. Jeuffroy, M.H., and B. Ney. 1997. Crop physiology and productivity. Field Crops Res. 53:3-16.
24. Lecoeur, J. 1994. Réponses phénologiques et m orphologiques du pois (Pisum sativum L.) à la contrainte hydrique. Conséquences sur le nombre de phytomères reproducteurs. ENSA de Montpellier, Montpellier.
25. Lecoeur, J., and L. Guilioni. 1998. Rate of leaf production in response to soil water deficits in field pea. Field Crops Res. 57:319-328.
26. Lecoeur, J., and L. Guilioni. 2005. Déficit hydrique et fonctionnement d'un couvert de pois. p. 164-173, In V. Biarnès et al. (ed.) Agrophysiologie du pois protéagineux. (In French.) INRA-Arvalis, Paris.
27. Lecoeur, J., and B. Ney. 2003. Change with time in potential-use efficiency in field pea. Eur. J. Agron. 19:91-105.
28. Lecoeur, J., and T.R. Sinclair. 1996. Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) transpiration and leaf growth in response to soil water deficits. Crop Sci. 36:331-335.
29. Lecoeur, J., and T.R. Sinclair. 2001. Harvest index increase during seed growth of field pea. Eur. J. Agron. 19:91-105.
30. Le Deunff, Y. 1988. Accumulation de la matière sèche chez le pois et sa modélisation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 26:377-382.
31. Lejeune-Hénaut, I., V. Bourion, G. Etévé, E. Cunot, K. Delhaye, and C. Desmyter. 1999. Floral initiation in fields-grown forage peas is delayed to a greater extent by short photoperiods, than in other types of European varieties. Euphytica 109:201-211.
32. Leterme, P., H. Manichon, and J. Roger-Estrade. 1994. Analyse intégrée des rendements du blé tendre et de leurs causes de variation dans un réseau de parcelles d'agriculteurs du Thymerais. (In French, with English abstract). Agronomie 14:341-361.
33. 4) fixation and seed yield. Agron. J. 74:307-311.
34. Manichon, H., and Y. Gautronneau. 1987. Guide méthodologique du profil cultural. (In French.) GEAREA et CEREF, Paris.
35. Maurer, A.R., D.E. Jaffray, and H.F. Fletcher. 1966. Response of peas to environment. III. Assessment of the morphological development of peas. Can. J. Plant Sci. 46:285-290.
36. Mokashi, D.D., J.D. Jadhav, M.R. Shewale, C.B. Gaikwas, and J.D. Path. 1997. Performance of crops and cropping systems under different dates of sowing. Indian J. Agron. 42:220-223.
37. Monteith, J.L. 1977. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 281:277-294.
38. Munier-Jolain, N.G., N.M. Munier-Jolain, R. Roche, B. Ney, and C. Duthion. 1998. Seed growth rate in grain legumes. I. Seed growth is not affected by assimilates availability on seed growth rate. J. Exp. Bot. 49:1963-1969.
39. Ney, B., C. Duthion, and O. Turc. 1994. Phenological response of pea to water stress during reproductive development. Crop Sci. 34:141-146.
40. Ney, B., and O. Turc. 1993. Heat-unit-based description of the reproductive development of pea. Crop Sci. 33:510-514.
41. Peksen, E., H. Bozoglu, A. Peksen, and A. Gülümser. 1977. Determination of the effects of different row spacings on yield and some other properties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars sown in spring and autumn. Acta Hortic. 579:313-318.
42. Pigeaire, A., C. Duthion, and O. Turc. 1986. Characterisation of final stage of seed abortion in indeterminate soybean, white lupin and pea. (In French, with English abstract.) Agronomie 6:371-378.
43. Poggio, S.L., E.H. Satorre, S. Dethiou, and G.M. Gonzalo. 2005. Pod and seed numbers as a function of photothermal quotient during the seed set period of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) crops. Eur. J. Agron. 22:55-69.
44. Ranalli, P., M. Di Candilo, and V. Faeti. 1997. Performance in northern Italy of pea breeding lines for dry seed yield. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 11:85-90.
45. Rasmussen, I.A. 2004. The effecr of sowing date, stale seedbed, row width and mechanical weed conrol on weeds and yields of organic winter wheat. Weed Res. 44:12-20.
46. Ridge, P.E., and D.L. Pye. 1985. The effects of temperature and frost at flowering on the yield of peas grown in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res. 12:339-346.
47. Roche, R. 1998. Modélisation de la variabilité des profils de graines associée à la séquenrialité du développement chez différents génotypes de pois protéagineux de prinremps. (In French.) INA, Paris-Grignon, France.
48. Roger-Estrade, J., G. Richard, H. Boizard, J. Boiffin, and J. Caneill. 2000. Modelling structural changes in tilled topsoil over time as a function of cropping systems. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51:455-474.
49. Saharia, P. 1986. Relative performance of pea varieties to sowing dates. Indian J. Agron. 31:377-379.
50. SAS Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT guide for personal computer. 6th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
51. Tardieu, F., and H. Manichon. 1987. Etat structural, enra cinement et alimentation hydrique du maïs. II.- Croissance et disposition spatiale du système racinaire. (In French, wirh English abstract). Agronomie 7:201-211.
52. Tsegaye, T., and C.E. Mullins. 1994. Effect of mechanical impedance on root growth and morphology of two varieties of pea (Pisum sativum L.). New Phytol. 126:707-713.
53. Union Nationale Interprofessionnelle des Plantes Riches en Protéines. 2005. Statistiques plantes riches en protéines. (In French). UNIP, Paris.
54. Uzun, A., and E. Açikgöz. 1998. Effect of sowing season and seeding rate on the morphological traits and yields in pea cultivars of differing leaf types. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 181:215-222.
55. Yin, X., J. Goudriaan, E.A. Lantinga, J. Vos, and H.J. Spiertz. 2003. A flexible sigmoid function of dererminate growth. Ann. Bot. 91:361-371.