The role of grain number, nitrogen nutrition and stem number in limiting pea crop (Pisum sativum) yields under agricultural conditions

European Journal of Agronomy

Volumn 8, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 29-37

  Dore T ^a   Meynard, J M ^a   Sebillotte, M ^a,b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b DADP ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Nitrogen nutrition; On farm diagnosis; Pisum sativum; Stem number; Yield determinants

Indexed keywords

PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 0031935338     PISSN: 11610301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1161-0301(97)00006-3     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aubry, C., Latiri-Souki, K., Doré, T., Griner, C., 1994. Diagnostic des facteurs limitants du rendement du blé dur en parcelles d'agriculteurs dans une petite région du semi-aride en Tunisie. Agronomie 14, 213-227.
2. Belford, R.K., Cannell, R.Q., Thomson, R.J., Dennis, C.W., 1980. Effects of waterlogging at different stages of development on growth and yield of peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 31, 857-869.
3. Boiffin, J., Caneill, J., Meynard, J.M., Sebillotte, M., 1981, Elaboration du rendement et fertilisation azotée du blé en Champagne crayeuse. I. Protocole et méthode d'étude d'un problème technique régional. Agronomic 1, 549-558.
4. Burleigh, J.R., Yamoah, C.F., Regas, J.L., Eylands, V.J., 1991, Analysis of factors related to wheat yield on farm fields in the Bureruka highlands of Rwanda. Agron. J. 83, 625-631.
5. Cannell, R.Q., Gales, K., Snaydon, R.W., Suhail, B.A., 1979. Effects of short-term waterlogging on the growth and yield of peas (Pisum sativum). Ann. Appl. Biol. 93, 327-335.
6. Cousin, R., Messager, A. and Vingère, A., 1985. Breeding for yield in combining peas. In: P.D. Hebblethwaite, M.C. Heath and T.C.K. Dawkins (Editors), The Pea Crop: A Basis for Improvement. Butterworths, London, pp. 115-129
7. Crozat, Y., Tricot, F. and Gillet, J.P., 1990. Relationship between dry matter production and N uptake in pea (Pisum sativum cv. Solara): A tool for the diagnosis of N deficiency. In: A. Scaife (Editor), Proc. 1st Congr. European Society of Agronomy. ESA, Colmar.
8. Crozat, Y., Aveline, A., Coste, F., Gillet, J.P., Domenach, A.M., 1994. Yield performance and seed production pattern of field-grown pea and soybean in relation to N nutrition. Eur. J. Agron. 2, 135-144.
9. Dantuma, G., 1983. Potential and actual yields of dried peas in north western Europe. In: R. Thompson and R. Casey (Editors), Perspectives for Peas and Lupins as Protein Crops. Martinus Nijhof, The Hague, pp. 165-167.
10. Davies, D.R., Berry, G.J., Heath, M.C. and Dawkins, T.C.K., 1985. Pea (Pisum sativum L.). In: R.J. Summerfield and E.H. Roberts (Editors), Grain Legume Crops. Collins, London, pp. 147-198.
11. Doré, T., 1992. Analyse, par voie d'enquète, de la variabilité des rendements et des effets précédent du pois protéagineux de printemps (Pisum sativum L.). Thèse de Doctorat de l'INA-PG. Paris, 214 pp.
12. Doré, T., 1994a. Influence des stress abiotiques sur le fonctionnement des nodosités de pois. In: B. Ney, E. Duchéne, B. Carrouée and F. Angevin (Editors), Agrophysiologie du Pois Protéagineux. INRA, ITCF, UNIP, Paris, pp. 121-128.
13. Doré, T., 1994b. Influence des stress abiotiques sur l'évolution du nombre de ramifications et de tiges chez le pois. In: B. Ney, E. Duchéne, B. Carrouée and F. Angevin (Editors), Agrophysiologie du Pois Protéagineux. INRA, ITCF, UNIP, Paris, pp. 145-155.
14. Doré, T., Meynard, J.M., 1995. On-farm approach of attacks by the pea weevil (Sitona lineatus L.; Col., Curculionidae) and the resulting damage to pea (Pisum sativum L.) crops. J. Appl. Entomol. 119, 49-54.
15. Durrant, M.J., 1988. A survey of seedling establishment in sugar-beet crops in 1980 and 1981. Ann. Appl. Biol. 113, 347-355.
16. Duthion, C. and Sagan, M., 1994. Nutrition azotée et production du pois. In: B. Ney, E. Duchéne, B. Carrouée and F. Angevin (Editors), Agrophysiologie du Pois Protéagineux. INRA, ITCF, UNIP, Paris, pp. 179-184.
17. French, R.J., 1990. The contribution of pod numbers to field pea (Pisum sativum L.) yields in a short growing-season environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41, 853-862.
18. 4 crops with increasing plant mass. Ann. Bot. 66, 425-436.
19. Hardwick, R.C., Andrews, D.J., Hole, C.C., Salter, P.J., 1979. Variability in number of pods and yield in commercial crops of vining peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 92, 675-681.
20. Heath, M.C. and Hebblethwaite, P.D., 1985. Agronomic problems associated with the pea crop. In: P.D. Hebblethwaite, M.C. Heath and T.C.K. Dawkins (Editors), The Pea Crop: A Basis for Improvement. Butterworths, London, pp. 19-29.
21. Hebblethwaite, P.D., McGowan, M., 1980. The effects of soil compaction on the emergence, growth and yield of sugar beet and peas. J. Sci. Food Agric. 31, 1131-1142.
22. Hedley, C.L., Ambrose, M.J., 1981. Designing 'leafless' plants for improving yields of the dried pea crop. Adv. Agron. 34, 225-277.
23. Jeuffroy, M.H., 1991. Rôle de la vitesse de croissance, de la répartition des assimilats et de la nutrition azotée, dans l'élaboration du nombre de graines du pois protéagineux de printemps (Pisum sativum L.). Thèse de Doctorat, Univ. Paris-Sud, Centre d'Orsay, 206 pp.
24. Jeuffroy, M.M., Chabanet, C., 1994. A model to predict seed number per pod from early pod growth rate in pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. Exp. Bot. 45, 709-715.
25. Justes, E., Mary, B., Meynard, J.M., Machet, J.M., Thelier-Huche, L., 1994. Determination of a critical nitrogen dilution curve for winter wheat crops. Ann. Bot. 74, 397-407.
26. Lemaire, G., Gastal, F. and Salette, J., 1989. Analysis of the effect of N nutrition on dry matter yield of a sward by reference to potential yield and optimum N content. In: Proc. 16th Int. Grassland Congr., Nice, pp. 179-180.
27. Lemaire, G., Gastal, F., Cruz, P. and Greenwood, D.J., 1990. Relationships between plant-N, plant mass and relative growth rate for C3 and C4 crops. In: A. Scaiffe (Editor), Proc. 1st Congr. European Society of Agronomy. ESA, Colmar.
28. Leterme, P., Manichon, H., Roger-Estrade, J., 1994. Analyse intégrée des rendements du blé tendre et de leurs causes de variation dans un réseau de parcelles d'agriculteurs du Thymerais. Agronomie 14, 341-361.
29. Linck, A.J., 1961. The morphological development of the fruit of Pisum sativum, var Alaska. Phytomorphology 11, 79-84.
30. Matthews, S., Abdalla, M.M., Powell, A.A., Walker, K.C., Zulu, P., 1988. Investigations into ways of improving the establishment of oilseed rape and combining peas. Crop Res. (Hort. Res.) 28, 1-12.
31. Meadley, J.T., Milbourn, G.M., 1970. The growth of vining peas. The effect of density of planting. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 74, 273-278.
32. Meynard, J.M., David, G., 1992. Diagnostic sur l'élaboration du rendement des cultures. Cah. Agric. 1, 9-19.
33. Pate, J.S., 1975. Pea. In: L.T. Evans (Editor), Crop Physiology: Some Case Histories. University Press, Cambridge, pp. 191-224.
34. Pate, J.S., 1977. Nodulation and nitrogen metabolism. In: I.F. Suteliffe and J.S. Pate (Editors), The Physiology of the Garden Pea. Academic Press, London, pp. 349-383.
35. Powell, A.A., Matthews, S. and de Oliveira, M.A., 1984. Seed quality in grain legumes. In: T.H. Coaker (Editor), Advances in Applied Biology, Vol. 37, pp. 217-271.
36. Salter, P.J., Drew, D.H., 1965. Root growth as a factor in the response of Pisum sativum L. to irrigation. Nature 206, 1063-1064.
37. Sebillotte, M., 1990. Some concepts for analysing farming and cropping systems and for understanding their different effects. In: A. Scaiffe (Editor), Proc. 1st Congr. European Society of Agronomy. ESA, Colmar.
38. Sebillotte, M., Boiffin, J., Caneill, J., Meynard, J.M., 1978. Sécheresse et fertilisation azotée du blé d'hiver; essai d'analyse de situations au champ par l'étude des composantes du rendement. Bull. Assoc. Fr. Etude Sol 3, 197-214.
39. Shafiq, M., Azeem, M., Longmire, J., 1993. Diagnosing alternatives in conventional crop rotations: sunflowers as an alternative to wheat in the cotton-based cropping systems of Pakistan's Punjab. Agric. Syst. 42, 245-264.
40. Snoad, B., 1983. Improving the pea crop. In: R. Thompson and R. Casey (Editors). Perspectives for Peas and Lupins as Protein Crops. Martinus Nijhof, The Hague, pp. 101-111.
41. Snobar, B.A., Wilkins, D.E., Hadjichristodoulou, A. and Haddad, N.I., 1988. Stand establishment in pulse crops. In: R.J. Summerfield (Editor). World Crops: Cool Season Food Legumes. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 257-259.
42. Sprent, J.I., 1992. Effects of environment on temperate grain legume physiology, with an emphasis on nitrogen fixation. In: Proc. 1st Eur. Conf. on Grain Legumes, Angers, pp. 131-135.
43. Sprent, J.I., Stephens, J.H. and Rupela, O.P., 1988. Environmental effects on nitrogen fixation. In: R.J. Summerfield (Editor), World Crops: Cool Season Food Legumes. Kluwer Academic. Dordrecht, pp. 801-810.
44. 2 fixation by nitrate. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 7, 1-23.
45. Tricot, F., Crozat, Y., Tardieu, F., Sebillotte, M., 1990. Establishment and distribution of pea primary root nodules (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by light shading. Symbiosis 9, 97-103.