Computerized tomography colonography

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 615-625

  Burling, David ^a   Taylor, Stuart ^a   Halligan, Steve ^a  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barium enema; Colon; Colon neoplasm; Computerized tomography; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

BARIUM; DIATRIZOATE; GLUCAGON;

BARIUM ENEMA; CANCER SCREENING; COLON CANCER; COLON DILATATION; COLON DISEASE; COLON POLYP; COLON TUMOR; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIPOMA; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT POSITIONING; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 4444358448     PISSN: 14737140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14737140.4.4.615     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Muto T, Bussey H, Morson B. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36, 2251-2270 (1975).
2. Barish W, Consensus Statemant. Proc. Int. Symp. Virtual Colonoscopy (2003).
3. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224, 393-403 (2002).
4. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V et al. Optimizing colonic distension for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine hydrobromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229, 99-108 (2003).
5. 2 and air on double-contrast study. Radiology 157(1), 35-36 (1985).
6. Burling D, Halligan S, Taylor SA, Usiskin S, Bartram CI. CT colonography practice in the United Kingdom: a National Survey. Clin. Radiol 59, 39-43 (2004).
7. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI et al. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen. Radiology 229, 109-118 (2003).
8. Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA, Van Holsbeeck BG, Lefere PA. Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur. Radiol. (2004) (In Press).
9. Health and Safety Executive. Statutory Act of Parliament: 1999, no. 3232. The Stationary Office Books, London, UK. (1999).
10. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al. Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience. Eur. Radiol. 13(6), 1297-1302 (2003).
11. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH. Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 181, 799-805 (2003).
12. Morrin M, Farrell R, Keogan M, Kruskal J, Yam C, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography: colonic distension improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagons. Eur. Radiol. 12, 525-530 (2002).
13. Morrin M, Farrell R, Kruskal J et al. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217, 765-771 (2000).
14. Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M, Marinelli T, Genovesi D, Bonomo L. Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography - initial experience. Radiology 231, 83-90 (2004).
15. Yee J, Akerkar G, Hung R, Steinauer-Gebauer A, Wall S, Mcquaid K. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219, 685-692 (2001).
16. Rembacken B, Fujii T, Cairns A et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355, 1211-1214 (2000).
17. Bond JH. Doubling time of flat and polypoid colorectal neoplasms: defining the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95(7), 1621-1623 (2000).
18. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Lavin PT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 181, 1593-1598 (2003).
19. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 2191-2200 (2003).
20. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back to back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112, 24-28 (1997).
21. Cotton P, Durkalski V, Pineau B et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291(14), 1713-1719 (2004).
22. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur. Radiol. 14(6), 1025-1033 (2004).
23. Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Baufeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 94, 2268-2274 (1999).
24. Akerkar GA, Yee J, Hung R, McQuaid K. Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 54, 310-315 (2001).
25. Gluecker T, Johnson D, Harmsen W et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colongraphy, colonoscopy, and double contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227, 378-384 (2003).
26. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222, 337-345 (2002).
27. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Bassett P, Vance M, Bartram CI. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Am. J. Roentgenol. 181, 913-921 (2003).
28. Kamar M, Portnoy O, Bar-Dayan A et al. Actual colonic perforation in virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis. Colon Rectum 47, 1242-1246 (2004).
29. Coady-Fariborzian L, Angel L, Procaccino J. Perforated colon secondary to virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis. Colon Rectum 47, 1247-1249 (2004).
30. Blakeborough A, Sheridan MB, Chapman AH. Retention balloon catheters and barium enemas: attitudes, current practice and relative safety in the UK. Clin. Radiol. 52(1), 62-64 (1997).
31. Taylor SA, Halligan S, O'Donnell C et al. Cardiovascular effects at multi-detector row CT colonography compared with those at conventional endoscopy of the colon. Radiology 229(3), 782-790 (2003).
32. Berrino F, Capocaccia R, Estee J et al. Survival of Cancer Patients in Europe: the EUROCARE-2 Study. International Agency for research on Cancer, Lyon, France, IARC Scientific Publications No 151 (1999).
33. Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Goldberg SN, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 172, 913-918 (1999).
34. Ng CS, Doyle TC, Pinto EM et al. Evaluation of CT in identifying colorectal. carcinoma in the frail and disabled patient. Eur. Radiol. 12(12), 2988-2997 (2002).
35. Domjan J, Blaquiere F, Odurny A. Is minimal preparation computed tomography comparable with barium enema in elderly patients with colonic symptoms? Clin. Radiol. 53, 894-898 (1998).
36. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale - update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124, 544-560 (2003).
37. Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 133, 761-769 (2000).
38. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MHE et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348, 1472-1477 (1996).
39. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen O, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348, 1467-1471 (1996).
40. Mandel J, Bond J, Church T, Snover D, Bradley M, Schuman L. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N. Engl. J. Med. 328, 1365-1371 (1993).
41. Waye JD, Kahn O, Auerbach ME. Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroendosc. Clin. N. Am. 6, 343-377 (1996).
42. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 162-168 (2000).
43. Bowles CJA, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53, 277-283 (2004).
44. Bond JH. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95(11), 3053-3063 (2000).
45. Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Anderson SN et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 39, 449-456 (1996).
46. UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 359, 1291-1300 (2002).
47. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 169-174 (2000).
48. Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1766-1772 (2000).
49. Halligan S, Marshall M, Taylor SA et al. Inter-observer variation in reporting of double contrast barium enema: implications for screening and training. Clin. Radiol. 58, 948-954 (2003).
50. Hellstrom M, Svensson MH, Lasson A. Extracolonic and incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 182, 631-638 (2004).
51. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124, 911-916 (2003).
52. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Partzsch U et al. Invasive cancer in colorectal adenomas: multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. Endoscopy 29, 626-631 (1997).
53. Spencer RJ, Melton LJ III, Ready RL, Ilstrup DM. Treatment of small colorectal polyps: a population based study of the risk of subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin. Proc. 59, 305-310 (1984).
54. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125, 311-319 (2003).
55. Culpan DG, Mitchell AJ, Hughes S, Nutman M, Chapman AH. Double contrast barium enema sensitivity: a comparison of studies by radiographers and radiologists. Clin. Radiol. 57, 604-607 (2002).
56. Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, Malley JD, Johnson CD. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 225, 391-399 (2002).
57. Summers RM. Challenges for computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Abdom. Imaging 27, 268-274 (2002).
58. Zallis M, Hahn P. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 646-648 (2001).