Age differences in dimension weighting on visual feature search

Visual Cognition

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 721-750

  Kumada, Takatsune ^a   Hibi, Yuko ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

EID: 4444352198     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280344000491     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67-83.
2. Cohen, A., & Magen, H. (1999). Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single- feature targets. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 291-307.
3. Folk, C. L., & Lincourt, A. E. (1996). The effects of age on guided conjunction search. Experimental Aging Research, 22, 99-118.
4. Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
5. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (2000). Age-related effects in the marking of old objects in visual search. Psychology and Aging, 15, 286-296.
7. Kumada, T. (2001). Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 698-708.
8. Kumada, T., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 493-503.
9. Madden, D. J., Gottlob, L. R., & Allen, P. A. (1999). Adult age differences in visual search accuracy: Attentional guidance and target detectability. Psychology and Aging, 14, 683-694.
10. Madden, D. J., Pierce, T. W., & Allen, P. A. (1996). Adult age differences in the use of distractor homogeneity during visual search. Psychology and Aging, 11, 454-474.
11. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out, II. The role of position. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 977-991.
12. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out, III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
13. Maylor, E. A., & Lavie, N. (1998). The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychology and Aging, 13, 563-573.
14. Müller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
15. Plude, D. J., & Doussard-Roosevelt, J. A. (1989). Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. Psychology and Aging, 4, 98-105.
16. Pollmann, S., Weidner, R., Müller, H. J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). A fronto-posterior network involved in visual dimension changes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 480-494.
17. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
18. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
19. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
20. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
21. Watson, D. G., & Maylor, E. A. (2002). Aging and visual marking: Selective deficits for moving stimuli. Psychology and Aging, 17, 321-339.
22. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
23. Yoshida, T., Wake, T., & Osaka, N. (2000). Capacities of the memory contributing priming of pop-out and its adult-age differences. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 19, 37-38. (In Japanese with English abstract)