Evaluation of a Russell's viper venom-based protein C assay [4]

Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 430-431

  Flanders, Michele M ^a   Rodgers, George M ^a,b  

^a ARUP LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD CLOTTING FACTOR 10; BLOOD CLOTTING FACTOR 10A; BLOOD CLOTTING FACTOR 8; PROTEIN C; VIPER VENOM;

BLOOD CLOTTING; BLOOD CLOTTING TIME; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVALUATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; LETTER; LINEAR SYSTEM; PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN C DEFICIENCY; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFERENCE VALUE; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THROMBOSIS;

EID: 4444348029     PISSN: 03406245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613734     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Kottke-Marchant K, Comp P. Laboratory issues in diagnosing abnormalities of protein C, thrombomodulin, and endothelial cell protein C receptor. College of American Pathologists Consensus Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126: 1337-48.
2. Marlar A, Adcock D. Clinical evaluation of protein C: A comparative review of antigenic and functional assays. Human Pathology 1989; 20: 1040-47.
3. DeMoerloose P, Reber G, Bouvier C. Spuriously low levels of protein C with Protac activation clotting assay. Thromb, Haemost 1988; 59: 543.
4. Martin R. General Deming regression for estimating systemic bias and its confidence interval in method-comparison studies. Clin Chem 2000; 46: 100-4.