Amniotic fluid index vs single deepest pocket technique during modified biophysical profile: A randomized clinical trial

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 191, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 661-667

  Chauhan, Suneet P ^a,e   Doherty, Dorota D ^b   Magann, Everett F ^c   Cahanding, Francis ^d   Moreno, Frank ^d   Klausen, Jack H ^d  

^a Gibbs Cancer Center and Research Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH   (United States)

^d Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific   (United States)

^e Regional Women's Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Amniotic fluid; Modified biophysical profile; Oligohydramnios

Indexed keywords

AMNION FLUID; BIOPHYSICS; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LABOR; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS; PATIENT MONITORING; PH; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UMBILICAL ARTERY;

EID: 4444346462     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.078     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antenatal fetal surveillance 1993 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Washington (DC) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 9
2. A. Golan G. Lin S. Evron S. Arieli D. Niv M.P. David Oligohydramnios: maternal complications and fetal outcome in 145 cases Gynecol Obstet Invest 37 1994 91 95
3. B.M. Casey D.D. McIntire S.L. Bloom M.J. Lucas R. Santos D.M. Twickler Pregnancy outcomes after antepartum diagnosis of oligohydramnios at or beyond 34 weeks' gestation Am J Obstet Gynecol 182 2000 909 912
4. J.P. Phelan C.V. Smith P. Broussard M. Small Amniotic fluid volume assessment with the four-quadrant technique at 36-42 weeks' gestation J Repro Med 32 1987 540 542
5. E.F. Magann C.M. Isler S.P. Chauhan J.N. Martin Jr. Amniotic fluid volume estimation and the biophysical profile: a confusion of criteria Obstet Gynecol 96 2000 640 642
6. E.F. Magann S.P. Chauhan M.J. Kinsella M.F. McNamara N.S. Whitworth J.C. Morrison Antenatal testing among 1001 patients at high risk: the role of ultrasonographic estimate of amniotic fluid volume Am J Obstet Gynecol 180 1999 1330 1336
7. M. Rainford R. Adair A. Scialli A. Ghidini C.Y. Spong Amniotic fluid index in uncomplicated term pregnancy: prediction of outcome J Reprod Med 46 2001 589 592
8. S.E. Rutherford J.P. Phelan C.V. Smith N. Jacobs The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing Obstet Gynecol 70 1987 353 356
9. E.G. Voxman S. Tran D.A. Wing Low amniotic index as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome J Perinatol 22 2002 282 285
10. S.P. Chauhan M. Sanderson N.W. Hendrix E.F. Magann L.D. Devoe Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: a meta-analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 181 1999 1473 1478
11. Z. Alfirevic M. Luckas S.A. Walkinshaw M. McFarlane R. Curran A randomized comparison between amniotic fluid index and maximum pool depth in the monitoring of post-term pregnancy BJOG 104 1997 207 211
12. K. Amano K. Saito T. Shoda A. Tani H. Youshihara M. Nishijima Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a prospective randomized trial J Obstet Gynaecol Res 25 1999 33 37
13. M.P. Nageotte C.V. Towers T. Asrat R.K. Freeman Perinatal outcome with modified biophysical profile Am J Obstet Gynecol 170 1994 1672 1676
14. P.F. Chamberlain F.A. Manning I. Morrison C.R. Harman I.R. Lange Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volume to perinatal outcome Am J Obstet Gynecol 150 1984 245 249
15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Dystocia and the augmentation of labor. ACOG technical bulletin 218 1995 A Washington, DC
16. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Fetal heart rate patterns: Monitoring, interpretation, and management 1995 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Washington, DC ACOG technical bulletin 207
17. R. Jaeschke G.H. Guyatt D.L. Sackett for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' guide to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 271 1994 703 707
18. D.A. Miller Y.A. Rabello R.H. Paul The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s Am J Obstet Gynecol 174 1996 82 87
19. S.E. Rutherford J.P. Phelan C.V. Smith The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing Obstet Gynecol 70 1987 353 356
20. A.P. Sarno M.O. Ahn H.S. Brar J.P. Phelan L.D. Platt Intrapartum Doppler velocimetry, amniotic fluid volume, and fetal heart rate as predictors of subsequent non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing: an initial report Am J Obstet Gynecol 161 1989 1508 1514
21. F.A. Manning N. Bondaji C.R. Harman O. Casiro S. Menticoglou I. Morrison Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring.VIII Am J Obstet Gynecol 178 1998 696 706