Problem-solving ultrasound

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 909-918

  Mendelson, Ellen B ^a,b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Breast Imaging Section   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; LACTATION; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; REVIEW; ULTRASOUND; UNITED STATES;

BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PALPATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 4444341360     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.06.015     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. V.P. Jackson The role of US in breast imaging Radiology 177 1990 305 311
2. A.T. Stavros, D. Thickman, C.L. Rapp, M.A. Dennis, S.H. Parker, and G.A. Sisney Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions Radiology 196 1995 123 134
3. C.J. D'Orsi, L.W. Bassett, W.A. Berg, S. Feig, V.P. Jackson, and D.B. Kopans BI-RADS, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4th edition 2003 American College of Radiology Reston (VA)
4. E.B. Mendelson, W.A. Berg, and C.R. Merritt Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound Semin Roentgenol 36 2001 217 225
5. G. Rahbar, A.C. Sie, G.C. Hansen, J.S. Prince, M.L. Melany, and H.E. Reynolds Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation Radiology 213 1999 889 894
6. J.A. Baker, P.J. Kornguth, M.S. Soo, R. Walsh, and P. Mengoni Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 1999 1621 1625
7. E.A. Sickles Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases Radiology 179 1991 463 468
8. E.A. Sickles Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? Radiology 213 1999 11 14
9. American College of Radiology Standard for the performance of the breast ultrasound examination 2002 American College of Radiology Reston (VA)
10. T.M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J.H. Newhouse Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics Radiology 207 1998 191 199
11. D.M. Ikeda Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances Radiology 172 1989 661 666
12. E.B. Mendelson The breast J.W. Charboneau Diagnostic ultrasound 1998 Mosby St. Louis 751 789
13. M.S. Soo, E.L. Rosen, J.A. Baker, T.T. Vo, and B.A. Boyd Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 2001 1167 1170
14. K. Flobbe, A.M. Bosch, A.G. Kessels, G.L. Beets, P.J. Nelemans, and M.F. von Meyenfeldt The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer Arch Intern Med 163 2003 1194 1199
15. K.M. Harris, M.A. Ganott, K.C. Shestak, H.W. Losken, and H. Tobon Silicone implant rupture: detection with US Radiology 187 1993 761 768
16. D.F. Mund, D.M. Farria, D.P. Gorczyca, N.D. DeBruhl, C.Y. Ahn, and W.W. Shaw MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone-gel implants: spectrum of findings AJR Am J Roentgenol 161 1993 773 778
17. N.D. DeBruhl, D.P. Gorczyca, C.Y. Ahn, W.W. Shaw, and L.W. Bassett Silicone breast implants: US evaluation Radiology 189 1993 95 98
18. E.B. Mendelson Radiation changes in the breast Semin Roentgenol 28 1993 344 362
19. M.C. Smitt, R.L. Birdwell, and D.R. Goffinet Breast electron boost planning: comparison of CT and US Radiology 219 2001 203 206
20. C. Leonard, C.L. Harlow, and C. Coffin Use of US to guide radiation boost planning following lumpectomy for carcinoma of the breast International Journal of Oncology Biology and Physics 27 1993 1193 1197
21. D.B. Kopans Mammography and radiation risk M.L. Janower O.W. Linton Radiation risk: a primer 1996 American College of Radiology Reston (VA) 12
22. Appropriateness Criteria ACR Imaging work-up of palpable breast masses 2003 American College of Radiology Reston (VA)
23. E.B. Mendelson The development and meaning of appropriateness guidelines Radiol Clin North Am 33 1995 1081 1084
24. J.W. Leung, and E.A. Sickles Multiple bilateral masses detected on screening mammography: assessment of need for recall imaging AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 2000 23 29
25. P.B. Gordon, and S.L. Goldenberg Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review Cancer 76 1995 626 630
26. W. Buchberger, A. Niehoff, P. Obrist, P. DeKoekkoek-Doll, and M. Dunser Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21 2000 325 336
27. S.S. Kaplan Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue Radiology 221 2001 641 649
28. W.A. Berg, and P.L. Gilbreath Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation Radiology 214 2000 59 66
29. A.M. Bosch, A.G. Kessels, and G.L. Beets Interexamination variation of whole breast ultrasound Br J Radiol 76 2003 328 331
30. P. Skaane, K. Engedal, and A. Skjennald Interobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging: comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and both combined in the interpretation of palpable noncalcified breast masses Acta Radiol 38 4 Pt 1 1997 497 502
31. E.E. Deurloo, P.J. Tanis, K.G. Gilhuijs, S.H. Muller, R. Kroger, and J.L. Peterse Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer Eur J Cancer 39 2003 1068 1073
32. A. Hlawatsch, A. Teifke, M. Schmidt, and M. Thelen Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 2002 1493 1501