Firing back at the backfire effect: The influence of mortality salience and nullification beliefs on reactions to inadmissible evidence

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 389-410

  Cook, Alison ^a   Arndt, Jamie ^a   Lieberman, Joel D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

backfire effect; juror motivation; Terror management

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CIVIL DEFENSE; COURT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; EXPERT WITNESS; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; JUSTICE; LAW; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MORTALITY;

ATTITUDE TO DEATH; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PUNISHMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4444333171     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039332.21386.f4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., & Cook, A. (2002). Mortality salience and the spreading activation of worldview-relevant constructs: Exploring the cognitive architecture of terror management. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 307-324.
2. Arndt, J., Lieberman, J. D., Cook, A., & Solomon, S. (2003). Death in the courtroom: Exploring the effects of mortality salience on legal decision-making. Manuscript under review, Columbia, MO.
3. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
4. Broeder, D. W. (1959). The University of Chicago jury project. Nebraska Law Review, 88, 744-760.
5. Cook, A., Arndt, J., & Lieberman, J. D. (2003). The influence of mortality salience induced by prosecutorial statements on juror verdicts. Manuscript in preparation. University of Missouri, Columbia.
6. Cox, M., & Tanford, S. (1989). Effects of evidence and instructions in civil trials: An experimental investigation of rules of admissibility. Social Behaviour, 4, 31-55.
7. Edwards, K., & Bryan, T. S. (1997). Judgmental biases produced by instructions to disregard: The (paradoxical) case of emotional information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 849-864.
8. Fein, S., McCloskey, A., & Tomlinson, T. (1997). Can the jury disregard that information? The use of suspicion to reduce the prejudicial effects of pretrial publicity and inadmissible testimony. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1215-1226.
9. Finkel, N. J. (2000). Commonsense justice and jury instructions: instructive and reciprocating connections Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 591-628.
10. Florian, V., & Mikulincer, M. (1997). Fear of death and the judgement of social transgressions: A multidimensional of terror management theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 369-380.
11. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308-318.
12. Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and social behavior: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61-139). New York: Academic Press.
13. Harmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T. Solomon, S., & McGregor, H. (1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduced mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 24-36.
14. Horowitz, I. A. (1985). The effect of jury nullification instruction on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 25-36.
15. Horowitz, I. A. (1988). Jury nullification: The impact of judicial instructions, arguments, and challenges on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 439-453.
16. Judges, D. P. (1999). Scared to death: Capital punishment as authoritarian terror management. University of California, Davis Law Review, 1-138.
17. Lieberman, J. D., & Arndt, J. (2000). Understanding the limits of limiting instruction: Social psychological explanations for the failure of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 677-711.
18. Lieberman, J. D., Arndt, J., Personious, J. & Cook, A. (2001). Vicarious annihilation: The effect of mortality salience on perceptions of hate crimes. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 547-566.
19. Lieberman, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (1997). What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 1-56.
20. Lieberman, J. D., & Silver, N. C. (2000). The effects of rational and experiential processing, judicial instructions, and personal beliefs on juror nullification. Poster session presented at the American Psychological-Law Society Biennial Conference. Las Vegas, NV, March, 2002.
21. McGregor, H., Lieberman, J. D., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Arndt, J., Simon, L., et al. (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview threatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 590-605.
22. Niedermeier, K. E., Horowitz, I. A., & Kerr, N. L. (1999). Informing jurors of their nullification power: A route to a just verdict or judicial chaos? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 331-351.
23. Nisbitt, R., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
24. Pickel, K. L. (1995). Inducing jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence: A legal explanation does not help. Law & Human Behavior, 19, 407-424.
25. Pickel, K. L., & Brown, J. R. (2002). Mortality salience and jurors' evaluations of criminal defendants: The effects of thinking about one's own or another person's death. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Pyszczynski, T. A., Greenberg, J., Mack, D., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1981). Opening statements in a jury trial: The effect of promising more than the evidence can show. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 434-444.
27. Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory I: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681-690.
28. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 93-159) New York: Academic Press.
29. Thompson, W. C., Fong, G. T., & Rosenhan, D. C. (1981). Inadmissible evidence and juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 453-463.
30. van den Bos, K. (2001). Reactions to perceived fairness: The impact of mortality salience and self-esteem on ratings of negative affect. Social Justice Research, 14, 1-23.
31. van den Bos, K., & Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 355-366.
32. Wiener, R. L., Habert, K., Shkodriani, G., & Staebler, C. (1991). The social psychology of jury nullification: Predicting when jurors disobey the law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1379-1401.
33. Wolf, S., & Montgomery, D. A. (1977). Effects of inadmissible evidence and level of judicial admonishment to disregard on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 205-219.