Trademark data as economic indicator: The United States, 1996-2000

Great Lakes Geographer

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 46-56

  Gatrell, Jay D ^a   Ceh, S L Brian ^a  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic; Innovation; Trademark; United States

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4444325019     PISSN: 11953071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. 1996. R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review 86:630-640.
2. Bosworth, D., A. Wharton, and C. Greenhalgh. 2000. Intangible assets and the market valuation of UK firms: Evidence from fixed effect models. Working Paper, Oxford Intellectual Property Research Center at St. Peter's College, April.
3. Bouchoux, D. 2001. Protecting Your Company's Intellectual Property. New York City, American Management Association.
4. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce. 2001. Regional accounts data: GSP & Annual Personal Income. [http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/data.htm]
5. Calzonetti, F. and J. Gatrell. 2000. State science and technology planning in rural states: Challenges facing practitioners. Economic Development Quarterly 14:360-375.
6. Calzonetti, F., Allison, T., and J. Gatrell. 1999. Science and technology capability and economic development in lagging states: The case of West Virginia manufacturing. Southeastern Geographer 39(1):22-45.
7. Casetti, E.. 1972. Generating models by the expansion method: Applications to geographic research. Geographical Analysis 4:81-91.
8. Ceh, B. 2001. Regional innovation potential in the United States: Evidence of spatial transformation. Papers in Regional Science 80:297-316.
9. Ceh, B. and A. Hecht. 1990. A spatial examination of inventive activity in Canada: An urban and regional analysis between 1881 and 1986. Ontario Geography, 35:25-33.
10. Council of Economic Advisors, Office of the President. 2001. Economic Report of the President. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office.
11. DeVol, R. 1999. American,s High Tech Economy: Growth, Development and Risks for Metropolitan Areas. Santa Monica, CA, Milkin Institute.
12. Feldman, M. 1994. The university and economic development: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly 8:67-76.
13. Feldman, M. and R. Florida. 1994. The geographic sources if innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84:210-229.
14. Florida, R. and M.Kenney. 1994. The globalization of Japanese R&D: the economic geography of Japanese R&D investment in the United States. Economic Geography 70:344-369.
15. Foudree, B. and P. Trzyna. 1999. Trade, service marks, domain names soar. National Underwriter, December 27, p. 9, 23.
16. Gatrell, J. 2002. Business services, productivity, and wages: Metropolitan and non-metropolitan Michigan counties. Professional Geographer 54:365-378.
17. Greenhalgh, C., and M. Longland. 2002. Running to stand still? Intellectual property and value added in innovating firms. Working Paper, Oxford Intellectual Property Research Center at St. Peter's College, January.
18. Greenhalgh, C., M. Longland, and D. Bosworth. 2001. Technological activity and employment in a panel of UK firms. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 48:260-282.
19. Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28:1661-1707.
20. Hicks, M. 2000. Dot-coms play the name game. eWeek, September 18, 59.
21. Jaffe, A. 2000. The U.S. patent system in transition. Research Policy 29:531-557.
22. Jaffe, A. 1994. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108:577-586.
23. Jones, J. P. and R. Q. Hanham. 1995. Contingency, Realism, and the Expansion Method. Geographical Analysis 27:185-207.
24. Levine, E. 1997. Personal Conversation, October 28.
25. Levine, E. 1991. Considerations for patent disclosure. les Nouvelles September, 137-138.
26. Lin, Z, J. Yates, and G. Picot. 2001. Rising self-employment rates amidst high unemployment: An empirical analysis of recent events in Canada. Ottawa, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
27. Malecki, E. 1991. Technology and Economic Development. Burnt Mill, UK, Longman Scientific and Technical.
28. Markusen, A. 1999. Debates and Surveys: Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 33:869-884.
29. Mitchelson, R. 1999. Spatial aspects of technology transfer: Evidence from Kentucky. Southeastern Geographer 39:206-219.
30. National Science Foundation (NSF). 2002. Science and Engineering State Profiles: 1999-2000. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
31. National Science Foundation (NSF). 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
32. O'hUallachain, B. 1999. Patent places: Size Matters. Journal of Regional Science 39:613-636.
33. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA, Harvard UniversityPress.
34. Simonot, K., Benichou, P., and Ponsi, C. 2001. Tracking the new economy in trademark filings. Trade Mark Yearbook, pp. 3-5.
35. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). 1995-2001. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks Annual Report. [http://www.uspto.gov].
36. Valentin-Mari, J. 2000. Puerto Rico Patents up 57% in 1999. Caribbean Business [from Business Source Database], October 26.
37. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). 2002. The 21st Century Strategic Plan. Washington, DC, USPTO, June 3.
38. Worgan, A. and Nunn, S. 2002. Exploring a complicated labyrinth: Some tips on using patent data to measure urban and regional innovation. Economic Development Quarterly 16:229-236.
39. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 2001. World Intellectual Property Organization Gazette. Geneva, WIPO publication.