Regional innovation potential in the United States: Evidence of spatial transformation

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 297-316

  Ceh, Brian ^a  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Innovation; Invention; Patent; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 1042281310     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.2001.tb01801.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Antonelli C (1986) The determinants of the distribution of innovative activity in a metropolitan area. Regional Studies 21: 85-92
2. Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economics and Statistics 29: 155-173
3. Bataini S-H, Coffey W (1998) The location of high knowledge content activities in the Canadian urban system, 1971-1991. Cahiers de Geographie du Quebec 42: 7-34
4. Barras R (1987) Technical change and the urban development cycle. Urban Studies 24: 5-30
5. Beggs I, Cameron G (1988) High technology location and the urban areas of Great Britain. Urban Studies 25: 361-379
6. Brouwer E, Budil-Nadvornikova H, Kleinknecht A (1999) Are urban agglomerations a better breeding place for product innovation? An analysis of new product announcements. Regional Studies 33: 541-549
7. Ceh B (1996) Temporal and spatial variability of Canadian inventive companies and their inventions: An issue of ownership. Canadian Geographer 40: 319-337
8. Ceh B (1997) The recent evolution of Canadian inventive enterprises. Professional Geographer 49: 64-76
9. Ewers H-J, Wettman R (1980) Innovation oriented regional policy. Regional Studies 14, 661-679
10. Feldman M, Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84: 210-229
11. Howells C (1984) The location of R&D. Regional Studies 19: 13-29
12. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Vintage Books, New York
13. Jacobs J (1984) Cities and wealth of nations. Random House, New York
14. Jaffe A (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577-586
15. Kleinknecht A (1987) Innovation patterns in crises and prosperity. St. Martins Press, New York
16. Lyons D (1995) Changing business opportunities: The geography of rapidly growing small U.S. private firms, 1982-1992. Professional Geographer 47: 388-398
17. Meyer-Krahmer F (1985) Innovation behaviour and regional indigenous potential. Regional Studies 10: 523-535
18. Mitchelson R (1999) Spatial aspects of technology transfer: Evidence from Kentucky.Southeastern Geographer 39: 206-219
19. Norton RD (2000) Creating the new economy: The entrepreneur and the U.S. resurgence. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA
20. Ó hUallacháin B (1999) Patent places: size matters. Journal of Regional Science 39: 613-636
21. Pred A (1966) The spatial implication of U.S. industrial growth. MIT Press, Massachusetts
22. Schumpeter J (1939) Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw Hill, New York
23. Schumpeter J (1950) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. McGraw Hill, New York
24. Schumpeter J (1961) The theory of economic development. Oxford Press, New York
25. Simon J, Stenman G (1984) The economic implication of learning by doing for population size and growth. European Economic Review 26: 167-185
26. Solow R (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312-320
27. Suarez-Villa L (1993) The dynamics of regional invention and innovation: Innovative capacity and regional change in the twentieth century. Geographical Analysis 25: 147-164
28. Thompson W (1966) Preface to urban economics. In: Perloff H, Wingo J (eds) Essays in urban economics. John Hopkins University, Maryland
29. Ullman E (1958) Regional development and the geography of concentration. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 4: 179-207
30. US Census (1990) US Census Office, Washington
31. US Patent Office (2000) Patent Statistics