Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer (Br J Surg 2004; 91: 409-417) [2]

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1202-

  Buchanan, G N ^a   Cohen, C R G ^a   Nicholls, R J ^a  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; COLON CANCER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INFECTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 4444302112     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4818     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer (COST). New Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-2059.
2. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2224-2229.
3. Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 534-545.
4. Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Arndt M, Bograd L, Neugebauer EA, Troidl H. Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 50-56.