Optimization of the crushing characteristics of triangulated aluminum beverage cans

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 47-54

  Han, J ^a,b   Yamazaki, K ^b   Nishiyama, S ^a  

^a MITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Axial crushing; Nonlinear structural analysis; Response surface approximation; Structural optimization; Triangulated cylinders

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYLINDERS (CONTAINERS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; POLYNOMIALS; RECYCLING;

AXIAL CRUSHING; NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; RESPONSE SURFACE APPROXIMATION; TRAINGULATED CYLINDERS;

STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 4444292645     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-004-0418-8     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Giunta, A.A.; Balabanov, V.; Hahn, D.; Grossman, B.; Mason, W.H.; Watson, L.T.; Haftka, R.T. 1997: Multidisciplinary optimisation of a supersonic transport using design of experiments theory and response surface modelling. The Aeronaut. J. 101(1008), 347-356
2. Guest, S.D.; Pellegrino, S. 1994a: The folding of triangulated cylinders. Part I: geometric considerations. J. Appl. Mech. 61, 773-777
3. Guest, S.D.; Pellegrino, S. 1994b: The folding of triangulated cylinders. Part II: the folding process. J. Appl. Mech. 61, 778-783
4. Guest, S.D.; Pellegrino, S. 1996: The folding of triangulated cylinders. Part III: experiments. J. Appl. Mech. 63, 77-83
5. Han, J.; Yamazaki, K. 2000: A study on maximization of dynamic crushing energy absorption of square tubes with and without stiffener. JSME Int. J. Ser. A 43(2), 138-145
6. Kashiwamura, T.; Shiratori, M.; Yu, Q.; Kohda, I. 1997: Structural optimization of electronic components by using statistical optimization method. Adv. Electron. Packag. ASME, pp. 1071-1077
7. Li, G.; Wang, H.; Aryasomayajula, S.R.; Grandhi, R.V. 2000: Two-level optimization of airframe structures using response surface approximation. Struct. Multidisciplin. Optim. 20(2), 116-124
8. Liu, B.; Haftka, R.T.; Akgun, M.A. 2000: Two-level composite wing structural optimization using response surfaces. Struct. Multidisciplin. Optim. 20(2), 87-96
9. Mitsubishi Research Institute. 1989: DYNA3D User Manual. Japan: Mitsubishi Research Institute (in Japanese)
10. Myers, R.H.; Montgomery, D.C. 1995: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. New York: Wiley Inc.
11. Nishiyama, S. 2002: Development and future subjects of aluminum beverage cans. Packpia 1, 140-147, (in Japanese)
12. Rodriguez, J.F.; Perez, V.M.; Padmanabhan, D.; Renaud, J.E. 2001: Sequential approximate optimization using variable fidelity response surface approximations. Struct. Multidisciplin. Optim. 22(1), 22-34
13. Vanderplaats Research and Development. 1995: DOT Users Manual, version 4.2. Vanderplaats Research and Development, USA
14. Venter, G.; Haftka, R.T. 1997: Minimum-bias based experimental design for constructing response surfaces in structural optimization. In: 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC SDM Conference, part 2, pp. 1225-1239, paper no. 97-1053
15. Yamazaki, K.; Han, J. 1998: Maximization of the crushing energy absorption of tubes. Struct. Optim. 16, 37-46