Two-level optimization of airframe structures using response surface approximation

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 116-124

  Li, G ^a   Wang, H ^a   Aryasomayajula, S R ^a   Grandhi, R V ^a  

^a Wright State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; SURFACES;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; RESPONSE SURFACES; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

AIRFRAMES;

EID: 0034295933     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001580050143     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Balabanov, V.; Giunta, A.; Golovidov, O.; Grossrnan, B.; Mason, W.; Watson, L.; Haftka, R. 1999: Reasonable design space approach to response surface approximation. AIAA J. Aircraft 36, 308-315
2. Box, G.; Draper, N. 1987: Empirical model-building and response surfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons
3. Giesing, J.; Wakayama, S. 1997: A simple cost related objective function for MDO of transport aircraft. 35-th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit (held in Reno, NV)
4. Koch, P.; Mavris, D.; Mistree, F. 1998: Multi-level, partitioned response surfaces for modeling complex systems. In: Proc. 7-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in St. Louis, MO), pp. 1954-1968
5. Kodiyalam, S.; Lin, J.; Wujek, B. 1998: Design of experiments based response surface models for design optimization. In: Proc. 39-th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures. Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf. and Exhibit, and AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Forum (held in Long Beach, CA), pp. 2718-2727
6. Korngold, J.; Gabriele, G. 1997: Multidisciplinary analysis and optimization of discrete problems using response surface methods. ASME J. Mech. Des. 119, 427-433
7. Kreisselmeier, G; Steinhauser, R. 1979: Systematic control design by optimizing a vector performance index. Proc. IFAC Symp. on Computer Aided Design of Control Systems (held in Zurich), pp. 113-117
8. Myers, R.H.; Montgomery, D.C. 1995: Response surface methodology - Process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
9. Myers, P.R.; Ugru, V.R.; Luo, X.; Grandhi, R.V. 1996: MIDAS for pre- and post-processing of ASTROS unsteady aerodynamic flutter models. Proc. 6-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in Bellevue, WA), pp. 1286-1298
10. Roux, W.; Stander, N.; Haftka, R. 1996: Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Proc. 6-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in Bellevue, WA), pp. 565-578
11. Rule, W. 1997: A response surface for structural optimization. ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Engrg. 119, 196-202
12. Stevens, D.; Striz, A.; Yurkovich, R. 1994: An interactive model generator/preprocessor for the multidisciplinary optimization of aircraft. Proc. 5-th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symp. Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in Panama City, FL), pp. 1310-1317
13. Thomas, H. 1996: Optimization of structures designed using nonlinear FEM analysis. Proc. 37-th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf. (held in Salt Lake City, UT), pp. 604-608
14. Universal Analytics, Inc. 1998: ASTROS user's manual. Version 20, Torrance. CA
15. Vanderplaats Research & Development, Inc. 1995: DOT users manual. Version 4.20. Colorado Springs, CO
16. Wang, H.; Li, G.; Aryasomayajula, S.; Grandhi, R. 1997: MIDAS GOLD - Guided optimization linking demo. Progress Report, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
17. Yurkovich, R. 1994: The use of Taguchi techniques with the ASTROS code for optimum wing structural design. Proc. 35-th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC, Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf. (held in Hilton Head, SC), pp. 1334-1342