Source-sink dynamics and the coexistence of species on a single resource

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 79-93

  Loreau, Michel ^a   DeAngelis, Donald L ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031002576     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1298     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Beddington J. R. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J. Anim. Ecol. 44:1975;331-340.
2. Caswell H. Predator-mediated coexistence: A nonequilibrium model. Am. Naturalist. 112:1978;127-154.
3. Crowley P. H. Predator-mediated coexistence: An equilibrium interpretation. J. Theor. Biol. 80:1979;129-144.
4. Davis G. J., Howe R. W. Juvenile dispersal, limited breeding sites, and the dynamics of metapopulations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 41:1992;184-207.
5. DeAngelis D. L., Goldstein R. A., O'Neill R. V. A model for trophic interaction. Ecology. 56:1975;881-892.
6. DeAngelis D. L., Loreau M., Neergaard D., Mulholland P. J., Marzolf E. R. Modelling nutrient-periphyton dynamics in streams: the importance of transient storage zones. Ecol. Modelling. 80:1995;149-160.
7. DeAngelis D. L., Waterhouse J. C. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecol. Monogr. 57:1987;1-21.
8. Fahrig L., Paloheimo J. Determinants of local population size in patchy habitats. Theor. Popul. Biol. 34:1988;194-213.
9. Hanski I. Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment with and without predation. Oikos. 37:1981;306-312.
10. Hanski I. Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment. Ecology. 64:1983;493-500.
11. Hanski I. Single-species spatial dynamics may contribute to long-term rarity and commonness. Ecology. 66:1985;335-343.
12. Hanski I. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: Concepts, models and observations. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42:1991;17-38.
13. Hanski I., Gilpin M. Metapopulation dynamics: Brief history and conceptual domain. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42:1991;3-16.
14. Henein K., Merriam G. The elements of connectivity where corridor quality is variable. Landscape Ecol. 4:1990;157-170.
15. Hochberg M. E., Hawkins B. A. Refuges as a predictor of parasitoid diversity. Science. 255:1992;973-976.
16. Holt R. D. Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. Am. Naturalist. 124:1984;377-406.
17. Holt R. D. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 28:1985;181-208.
18. Horn H. S., MacArthur R. H. Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology. 53:1972;749-752.
19. Howe R. W., Davis, G. J., Mosca V. The demographic significance of "sink" populations. Biol. Conserv. 57:1991;239-255.
20. Huisman J., Weissing F. J. Light-limited growth and competition for light in well-mixed aquatic environments: An elementary model. Ecology. 75:1994;507-520.
21. Huston M. A, DeAngelis D. L. Competition and coexistence: The effects of resource transport and supply rates. Am. Naturalist. 144:1994;954-977.
22. Hutson V., Law R. Permanent coexistence in general models of three interacting species. J. Math. Biol. 21:1985;285-298.
23. Jäger W., So J. W. -H., Tang B., Waltman P. Competition in the gradostat. J. Math. Biol. 25:1987;23-42.
24. Levin S. A. Dispersion and population interactions. Am. Naturalist. 108:1974;207-228.
25. Levins R., Culver D. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68:1971;1246-1248.
26. Loreau M. Time scale of resource dynamics and coexistence through time partitioning. Theor. Popul. Biol. 41:1992;401-412.
27. Loreau M. Coexistence of multiple food chains in a heterogeneous environment: Interactions among community structure, ecosystem functioning, and nutrient dynamics. Math. Biosci. 134:1996;153-188.
28. Puccia C. J., Levins R. Qualitative Modeling of Complex Systems. 1985;Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
29. Pulliam H. R. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Naturalist. 132:1988;652-661.
30. Pulliam H. R., Danielson B. J. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: A landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Naturalist. 137:1991;S50-S66.
31. Ruxton G. D. Short term refuge use and stability of predator- prey models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 47:1995;1-17.
32. Schoener T. W. Population growth regulated by intraspecific competition for energy or time: some simple representations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 4:1973;56-84.
33. Schoener T. W. Alternatives to Lotka-Volterra competition: Models of intermediate complexity. Theor. Popul. Biol. 10:1976;309-333.
34. Schoener T. W. Effects of density-restricted food encounter on some single-level competition models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 13:1978;365-381.
35. Sih A. Prey refuges and predator-prey stability. Theor. Popul. Biol. 31:1987;1-12.
36. Slatkin M. Competition and regional coexistence. Ecology. 55:1974;128-134.
37. Smith H. L., Tang B. Competition in the gradostat: The role of the communication rate. J. Math. Biol. 27:1989;139-165.
38. Smith H. L., Waltman P. The Theory of the Chemostat: Dynamics of Microbial Competition. 1995;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
39. Taylor A. D. Large-scale spatial structure and population dynamics in arthropod predator-prey systems. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 25:1988;63-74.
40. Taylor A. D. Metapopulations, dispersal, and predator-prey dynamics: An overview. Ecology. 71:1990;429-433.
41. Tilman D. Resource Competition and Community Structure. 1982;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
42. Tilman D. Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: The elements of a predictive theory of competition. Perspectives on Plant Competition. 1990;Academic Press, San Diego.
43. Vance R. R. Interference competition and the coexistence of two competitors on a single limiting resource. Ecology. 65:1984;1349-1357.
44. Vance R. R. The stable coexistence of two competitors for one resource. Am. Naturalist. 126:1985;72-86.