Form evaluation algorithms in coordinate metrology

Laser Metrology and Machine Performance VI

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 273-283

  Zhang, D ^a   Hill, M ^a   McBride, J ^a   Loh, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COORDINATE METROLOGY; FORM EVALUATION ALGORITHMS; SURFACE DATA; SURFACE FITTING;

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA ACQUISITION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FITS AND TOLERANCES; GEOMETRY; PROCESS CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

COORDINATE MEASURING MACHINES;

EID: 4444253209     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Hocken, R.J., J. Raja, and U. Babu, Sampling issues in coordinate metrology. Manufacturing Review, 1993. 6(4): p. 282-294.
2. Choi, W., T. Kerfess, and C. Jonathan, Sampling uncertainty in coordinate measuring data analysis. Precision Engineering, 1998. 22: p. 153-163.
3. Forbes, A.B., Least-squares best-fit geometric elements. NPL-Report, DITC 140/89. 1989.
4. Cox, M.G. and A.B. Forbes, Strategies for testing form assessment software. NPL-report, DITC 211/92, 1992.
5. Samuel, G.L. and M.S. Shunmugam, Evaluation of circularity from coordinate and form data using computational geometric techniques. Precision Engineering, 2000. 24: p. 251-263.
6. Chen, C.K. and C.H. Liu, A study on analysing the problem of the spherical form error. Precision Engineering, 2000. 24: p. 119-126.
7. Jung, M., et al., A method for the selection of algorithms for form characterisation of nominally spherical surface. Precision Engineering, 2000. 24: p. 127-138.
8. Sourlier, D., Surface-independent, theoretically exact bestfit for arbitrary sculptured, complex, or standard geometries. Precision Engineering, 1995. 17: p. 101-113.
9. Anthony, G.T. and H.M. Anthony, Chebychev best-fit geometric elements. NPL Report DITC 221/93,1993.
10. Rice, J.R., Numerical Methods, Software, Analysis. 1983: McGraw-Hill. 355-408.
11. Shunmugam, M.S., Technical Briefs: Criteria for computer-aided form evaluation. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1991. 113: p. 233-238.
12. McBride, J.W. and K.J. Cross, The measurement and analysis of three-dimensional form of curved surfaces,. Int. Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 1996. 36(5): p. 587-610.
13. Weckenmann, A. and H. Eitzert, Functionality-oriented evaluation and sampling strategy in coordinate metrology. Precision Engineering, 1995. 17: p. 244-252.
14. ISO, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Geneva, 1993.
15. Phillips, S.D., et al., The estimation of measurement uncertainty of small circular features measured by coordinate measuring machines. Precision Engineering, 1998. 22: p. 87-97.
16. Cox, M.G. and P.M. Harris, Guidelines to help users select and use software for their metrology applications, NPL report CSC 04/00, 2000.
17. Lin, S.S. and P. Varghese, A comparative analysis of CMM form-fitting algorithms. Manufacturing Review, 1995. 8: p. 47-58.
18. Hopp, T.H., Computational metrology. Manufacturing Review, 1993. 6(4): p. 295-304.
19. Chen, K.W. and A.S. Papadoupoulos, Comparison of linear and nonlinear least squares spheres. Microelectronics and Reliability, 1996. 36(1): p. 37-46.