Evaluation of circularity from coordinate and form data using computational geometric techniques

Precision Engineering

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 251-263

  Samuel, G L ^a   Shunmugam, M S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; HEURISTIC METHODS;

CIRCULARITY EVALUATION; COORDINATE MEASURING MACHINES;

COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING;

EID: 0034223979     PISSN: 01416359     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-6359(00)00039-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ANSI/ASME Y14.5M. Dimensioning and Tolerancing. New York: American National Standards Institute; The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1982.
2. ISO/R 1101-1983. Technical drawings - Geometrical tolerancing - Guidelines, ISO, Geneva, 12-01.
3. Shunmugam MS. On assessment of geometric errors. Int J Product Res 1986: 24(2):413-25.
4. Shunmugam M.S. Criteria for computer-aided form evaluation. J Eng Ind. 113:1991;233-240.
5. Murthy T.S.R., Abdin S.Z. Minimum zone evaluation of surfaces. Int J Machine Tool Design Res. 2:1980;123-136.
6. Chetwynd D.G. Applications of linear programming to engineering metrology. Proc Inst Mech Eng (Lond). 199:(B2):1985;93-100.
7. Danish P., Shunmugam M.S. An algorithm for form error evaluation using the theory of discrete and linear Chebyshev approximations. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng. 92:1991;309-324.
8. Etesami F., Hong Q. Analysis of two-dimensional measurement data for Automated inspection. J Manufact Syst. 9:(1):1990;21-34.
9. Roy U.R., Zhang X. Establishment of a pair of concentric circles with the minimum radial separation for assessing roundness error. Comp-Aided Design. 24:(3):1992;161-168.
10. Roy U.R., Zhang X. Development and application of voronoi diagrams in the assessment of roundness error in an industrial environment. Computers in industrial engineering. 26:(1):1994;11-26.
11. Novasaki O., Barczak A.L.C. Utilization of voronoi diagrams for circularity algorithms. Prec Eng. 20:(3):1997;188-195.
12. Weill R. Tolerancing for function. Ann CIRP 1988;37(2);603-10.
13. Namboothiri V.N.N., Shunmugam M.S. Function-oriented form evaluation of engineering surfaces. Prec Eng. 22:(3):1998;98-109.
14. Weckenmann A., Eitzert H., Garmer M., Weber H. Functionality oriented evaluation and sampling strategy in coordinate metrology. Prec Eng. 17:(4):1995;244-252.
15. Shunmugam M.S. Comparison of linear and normal deviations of form of engineering surfaces. Prec Eng. 9:(2):1987;96-102.
16. Preparata F.P., Shamos M.I. Computational Geometry An Introduction . 1985;Springer-Verlag, New York.
17. Preparata F.P., Hong S.J. Convex hulls of finite sets of points in two and three dimensions. Comm ACM. 20:(2):1977;87-93.
18. Namboothiri VNN. Development of algorithms and stratagies for the evaluation of engineering surfaces. Ph. D Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India 1998.