Component-based design and analysis: A case study

Proceedings - 1st International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, SEFM 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 126-135

  Jin, Y ^a   Lakos, C ^a   Esser, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; FORMAL METHODS;

ANALYSIS APPROACH; COMPONENT BASED DESIGN; CONSISTENCY PROPERTY; NON-TRIVIAL; PRODUCTION CELLS; SAFETY PROPERTY; STATE-SPACE EXPLOSION; SYSTEM VERIFICATIONS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

DESIGN; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 4444224459     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SEFM.2003.1236214     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Moses tool suite. https://sourceforge.net/projects/mosestoolsuite.
2. R. Alur and T. A. Henzinger. Reactive modules. Journal of Formal Methods in System Design, 15(1):7-48, 1999.
3. B. Bérard, M. Bidoit, A. Finkel, F. Laroussinie, A. Petit, L. Petrucci, P. Schnoebelen, and P. McKenzie. Systems and Software Verification: Model-Checking Techniques and Tools. Springer, 2001.
4. E. M. Clarke, O. Grumberg, S. Jha, Y. Lu, and H. Veith. Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement. In Proceedings of the Computer Aided Verification, LNCS 1855, pages 154-169, 2000.
5. L. de Alfaro and T. A. Henzinger. Interface automata. In Proceedings of the Foundation of Software Engeneering, volume 26 of Software Engineering Notes, pages 109-122. ACM Press, 2001.
6. R. Esser and J. W. Janneck. Moses: A tool suite for visual modelling of discrete-event systems. In Symposium on Visual/Multimedia Approaches to Programming and Software Engineering, HCC, 2001.
7. S. Graf, B. Steffen, and G. Lüttgen. Compositional minimisation of finite state systems using interface specifications. Formal Aspects of Computing, 8(5):607-616, 1996.
8. M. Heiner and P. Deussen. Petri net based qualitative analysis - A case study. Technical Report I-08, Brandenburg Technical University, Cottbus, 1995.
9. M. Heiner, P. Deussen, and J. Spranger. A case study in design and verification of manufacturing system control software with hierarchical Petri nets. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 15(2):139-152, 1999.
10. T. A. Henzinger, S. Qadeer, and S. K. Rajamani. You assume, we guarantee: Methodology and case studies. In Proceedings of the Computer Aided Verification, LNCS 1427, pages 440-451, 1998.
11. T. A. Henzinger, S. Qadeer, and S. K. Rajamani. Decomposing refinement proofs using assume-guarantee reasoning. In Proceedings of the Computer Aided Design, pages 245-253. IEEE Press, 2000.
12. J. W. Janneck and R. Esser. Higher-order Petri net modeling-techniques and applications. In Workshop on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, ICATPN, 2002.
13. Y. Jin, R. Esser, and J. W. Janneck. Describing the syntax and semantics of UML Statecharts in a heterogeneous modelling environment. In Proceedings of the Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, LNAI 2317, pages 320-334. Springer, 2002.
14. Y. Jin, R. Esser, and C. Lakos. Lightweight consistency analysis of dataflow process networks. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Conference, pages 291-300, 2003.
15. Y. Jin, R. Esser, C. Lakos, and J. W. Janneck. Modular analysis of dataflow process networks. In Proceedings of the Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, LNCS 2621, pages 184-199. Springer, 2003.
16. C. Lewerentz and T. Lindner, editors. Formal development of reactive systems: case study production cell, LNCS 891. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
17. J. Lilius and I. P. Paltor. The production cell: An exercise in formal verification of a UML model. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.
18. N. Lynch. Distributed Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, USA, 1996.
19. M. Mäkelä. Maria: Modular reachability analyser for algebraic system nets. In Proceedings of the Applications and Theory of Petri Nets, LNCS 2360, pages 434-444. Springer Verlag, 2002.
20. K. L. McMillan. Verification of an implementation of Tomasulo's algorithm by compositional model checking. In Proceedings of the Computer Aided Verification, LNCS 1427, pages 110-121, 1998.