The perception and estimation of egocentric distance in real and augmented reality environments

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 2249-2252

  Jerome, Christian ^a   Witmer, Bob ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE MEASUREMENT; OBJECT RECOGNITION; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AUGMENTED REALITY ENVIRONMENTS; VIRTUAL OBJECTS;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 44349194855     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Azuma, R. & Furmanski, C. (October, 2003). Evaluating label placement for augmented reality view management. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. Tokyo, Japan, 66-75.
2. Elliot, D. (1987). The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation. Journal of Motor Behavior 19(4), 476-485.
3. Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lillienthal, M. G. (1993). A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 5(3), 203-220.
4. Kirkley, S. E. (2003). Augmented Reality Performance Assessment Battery (ARPAB): Object recognition, distance estimation and size estimation using optical see-through head-worn displays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
5. th Annual Meeting, 1268-1272.
6. Livingston, M. A., Swan, J. E., Julier, S. J., Baillot, Y., Brown, D., Rosenbloom, L. J., Gabbard, J. L., Hollerer, T. H. & Hix, D. (2005). Evaluating system capabilities and user performance in the battlefield augmented reality system. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D. C. Web page retrieved from the World Wide Web April 22, 2005 from: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~holl/pubs/ livingston-2004-pmis.pdf.
7. Rieser, J. J., Ashmead, D. H., Talor, C. R., & Youngquist, G. A. (1990). Visual perception and guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 675-689.
8. Tang, A. Owen, C., Biocca, F. & Mou, W. (April, 2003). Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. Chi 2003 proceedings 5(1). ACM press, 73-80.
9. Thomson, J. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 9(3), 427-443.
10. Witmer, B. G. & Kline, P. B. (1998). Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7(2), 144-167.
11. Witmer, B. G., Jerome, C. J., & Singer, M. J. The factor structure of the Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. In press.
12. Witmer, B. G. & Sadowski, W. J. (1998). Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors 40(3), 478-488.