The psychology of speaker identification and earwitness memory

The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Volume II: Memory for People

Volumn 2, Issue , 2007, Pages 101-136

  Yarmey, A Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44349145679     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936368-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (191)

1. Abberton, E., & Fourcin, A. (1978). Intonation and speaker identification. Language and Speech, 21, 305-318.
2. Aiken, S. J., Jamieson, D. G., & Parsa, V. (1999). Behavioural speaker identification: A forensic application. Canadian Acoustics, 27, 3-9.
3. Armstrong, H. A., & McKelvie, S. J. (1996). Effect of face context on recognition memory for voices. Journal of General Psychology, 123, 259-270.
4. Aronovitch, C. (1976). The voice of personality: Stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker. Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 207-220.
5. Baldwin, J., & French, P. (1990). Forensic phonetics. London: Pinter.
6. Bartholomeus, B. (1973). Voice identification by nursery school children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 464-472.
7. Baugh, J. (2000). Racial identification by speech. American Speech, 75, 362-364.
8. Bennett, S., & Montero-Diaz, L. (1982). Children’s perception of speaker sex. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 113-121.
9. Berry, D. S. (1990). Vocal attractiveness and vocal babyishness: Effects on stranger, self, and friend impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 141-153.
10. Bonastre, J.-F., Bimbot, F., Boe, L.-J., Campbell, J. P., Reynolds, D. A., & Magrin-Chagnolleau, I. (2003). Person authentication by voice: A need for caution. Available at http://www.acp-parole.org/doc/AFCP_Sp1C_HotTopicsEurospeech03_final.pdf
11. Boucher, J., Lewis, V., & Collis, G. (1998). Familiar face and voice matching and recognition in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 171-181.
12. Bricker, P. D., & Pruzansky, S. (1966). Effects of stimulus content and duration on talker identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40, 1441-1449.
13. Brimacombe, C. A. E., Quinton, N., Nance, N., & Garrioch, L. (1997). Is age irrelevant? Perceptions of young and old adult eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 619-634.
14. Broeders, T., & Rietveld, T. (1995). Speaker identification by earwitnesses. In A. Braun & J.-P. Köster (Eds.), Studies in forensic phonetics (pp. 1-11). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
15. Bull, R., & Clifford, B. R. (1984). Earwitness voice recognition accuracy. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 92-123). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Bull, R., & Clifford, B. (1999). Earwitness testimony. In A. Heaton-Armstrong, E. Shepherd, & D. Wolchover (Eds.), Analysing witness testimony (pp. 194-206). London: Blackstone Press.
17. Bull, R., Rathborn, H., & Clifford, B. R. (1983). The voice recognition accuracy of blind listeners. Perception, 12, 223-226.
18. Carlucci, M., & Meissner, C. A. (2003, July). The influence of instructional bias on earwitness memory. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Aberdeen, Scotland.
19. Carterette, E. C., & Barneby, A. (1975). Recognition memory for voices. In E. Cohen & G. Notte-bohn (Eds.), Structure and processes in speech perception (pp. 246-265). New York: Springer.
20. Cerrato, L., Falcone, M., & Paoloni, A. (2000). Subjective age estimation of telephone voices. Speech Communication, 31, 107-112.
21. Christianson, S.-Ä. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.
22. Clarke, F. R., & Becker, R. W. (1969). Comparisons of techniques for discriminating among talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 747-761.
23. Clifford v. Kentucky, 7 SW3d 371 Ky 1999.
24. Clifford, B. R. (1980). Voice identification by human listeners: On earwitness reliability. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 373-394.
25. Clifford, B. R. (1983). Memory for voices: the feasibility and quality of earwitness evidence. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 189-218). Chichester: Wiley.
26. Clifford, B. R. (1997). A comparison of adults’ and children’s face and voice identification. Paper presented at the 5th European Congress of Psychology, July 6-11. Dublin, Ireland [cited in Bull & Clifford (1999)].
27. Clifford, B. R. (2003, July). Do children or adults exhibit a verbal overshadowing effect? Paper presented at the International Conference on Psychology and Law, Edinburgh, Scotland.
28. Clifford, B. R., Rathborn, H., & Bull, R. (1981). The effects of delay on voice recognition accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 201-208.
29. Clifford, B. R., & Toplis, R. (1996). A comparison of adults’ and children’s witnessing abilities. In N. Clark & G. Stephenson (Eds.). Investigative and forensic decision-making: Issuers in criminological and legal psychology (pp. 76-83). Leicester, British Psychological Society.
30. Cobb, N. J., Lawrence, D. N., & Nelson, N. D. (1979). Report on blind subjects’ tactile and auditory recognition for environmental stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 363-366.
31. Commonwealth v. Miles, 648 N.E.2d 719, 728-29 (Mass. 1995).
32. Cook, S., & Wilding, J. (1997a). Earwitness testimony 2: Voice, faces and context. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 527-541.
33. Cook, S., & Wilding, J. (1997b). Earwitness testimony: Never mind the variety, hear the length. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 95-111.
34. Cook, S., & Wilding, J. (2001). Earwitness testimony: Effects of exposure and attention on the face overshadowing effect. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 617-629.
35. DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mother’s voice. Science, 208, 1174-1176.
36. DeCasper, A. J., & Prescott, P. A. (1984). Human newborns’ perception of male voices: Preference, discrimination and reinforcing value. Developmental Psychology, 5, 481-491.
37. Deffenbacher, K., Cross, J., Handkins, R., Chance, J., Goldstein, A., Hammersley, R., & Read, J. D. (1989). Relevance of voice identification research to criteria for evaluating reliability of an identification. Journal of Psychology, 123, 109-119.
38. de Figueiredo, R. C., & de Souza Britto, H. (1996). A report on the acoustic effects of one type of disguise. Forensic Linguistics, 3, 168.
39. Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 317-344). New York: Academic Press.
40. Devenport, J. L., Studebaker, C. A., & Penrod, S. D. (1999). Perspectives on jury decisionmaking. In F. T. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 819-845). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
41. Doty, N. D. (1998). The influence of nationality on the accuracy of face and voice recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 191-214.
42. Elaad, E., Segev, S., & Tobin, Y. (1998). Long-term working memory in voice identification. Psychology, Crime & Law, 4, 73-88.
43. Erickson, B., Lind, A., Johnson, C., & O’Barr, W. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effect of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266-279.
44. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
45. Foulkes, P., & Barron, A. (2000). Telephone speaker recognition amongst members of a close social network. Forensic Linguistics, 7, 181-198.
46. Gilbert v. California, 388 U. S. 263 (1967).
47. Giles, S. G., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1982). A reply to a note on voice and racial categorization in Britain. Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 249-251.
48. Goggin, J. P., Thompson, C. P., Strube, G., & Simental, L. R. (1991). The role of language familiarity in voice identification. Memory and Cognition, 19, 448-458.
49. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1983, October). The effect of temporal distribution of the study trials on voice recognition: The spacing effect. Paper presented at the Biennial Convention of the American Psychology-Law Society, Chicago, IL.
50. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1985, May). Voice recognition: The effects of faces, temporal distribution of “practice” and social distance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychology Association, Chicago, IL.
51. Goldstein, A. G., Knight, P., Bailis, K., & Conover, J. (1981). Recognition memory for accented and unaccented voices. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 217-220.
52. Hammersley, R., & Read, J. D. (1985). The effect of participation in a conversation on recognition and identification of the speakers’ voices. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 71-81.
53. Hammersley, R., & Read, J. D. (1996). Voice identification by humans and computers. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 117-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Hanley, J. R., Smith, S. T., & Hadfield, J. (1998). I recognize you but I can’t place you: An investigation of familiar-only experiences during tests of voice and face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 179-195.
55. Hanley, J. R., & Turner, J. M. (2000). Why are familiar-only experiences more frequent for voices than for faces? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1105-1116.
56. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 106-112.
57. Heydon, D. (1994). Lawyer’s response to forensic linguistics. In J. Gibbons (Ed.), Language and the law (pp. 440-442). New York: Longman.
58. Hollien, H. (1990). The acoustics of crime. New York: Plenum.
59. Hollien, H. (1996). Considerations of guidelines for earwitness lineups. Forensic Phonetics, 3, 14-23.
60. Hollien, H. (2002). Forensic voice identification. New York: Academic Press.
61. Hollien, H., Bennett, G., & Gelfer, M. P. (1983). Criminal identification comparison: Aural versus visual identification resulting from a simulated crime. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 28, 208-221.
62. Hollien, H., Huntley, R., Künzel, H., & Hollien, P. A. (1995). Criteria for earwitness lineups. Forensic Linguistics, 2, 143-153.
63. Hollien, H., Majewski, W., & Doherty, E. T. (1982). Perceptual identification of voices under normal, stress and disguise speaking conditions. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 139-148.
64. Hollien, H., & Martin, C. A. (1996). Conducting research on the effects of intoxication on speech. Forensic Linguistics, 3, 107-128.
65. Hollien, H., Saletto, J. A., & Miller, S. K. (1993). Psychological stress in voice: A new approach. Studia Phonetica Posnaniensia, 4, 5-17.
66. Johnson, M. K., De Leonardis, D. M., Hashtroudi, S., & Ferguson, S. A. (1995). Aging and single versus multiple cues in source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 10, 507-517.
67. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
68. Kebbel, M. R., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1999). Face value? Evaluating the accuracy of eyewitness information. Police Research Series, Paper 102. London: The Home Office.
69. Kerstholt, J. H., Jansen, N. J. M., Van Amelsvoort, A. G., & Broeders, A. P. A. (2004). Ear-witnesses: Effects of speech duration, retention interval and acoustic environment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 327-336.
70. Komulainen, E. K. (1988). Subjective voice identification: The literal meaning of “talking yourself behind bars.” Alberta Law Review, 26, 521-547.
71. Köster, O., Hess, M. M., Schiller, N. O., & Künzel, H. J. (1998). The correlation between auditory speech sensitivity and speaker recognition ability. Forensic Linguistics, 5, 22-32.
72. Köster, O., & Schiller, N. O. (1997). Different influences of the native language of a listener on speaker recognition. Forensic Linguistics, 4, 18-28.
73. Köster, O., Schiller, N. O., & Künzel, H. J. (1995). The influence of native-language background on speaker recognition. In K. Elenius & P. Branderud (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm (Vol. 4, pp. 306-309).
74. Krauss, R. M., Freyberg, R., & Morsella, E. (2002). Inferring speakers’ physical attributes from their voices. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 618-625.
75. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., & Precoda, K. (1990). Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 103-115.
76. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Precoda, K., & Berke, G. S. (1992). Individual differences in voice quality perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 512-520.
77. Künzel, H. J. (1989). How well does average fundamental frequency correlate with speaker height and weight? Phonetica, 46, 117-125.
78. Künzel, H. J. (1994). On the problem of speaker identification by victims and witnesses. Forensic Linguistics, 1, 45-57.
79. Künzel, H. J. (1997). Some general phonetic and forensic aspects of speaking tempo. Forensic Linguistics, 4, 48-83.
80. Künzel, H. J. (2000). Effects of voice disguise on speaking fundamental frequency. Forensic Linguistics, 7, 149-179.
81. Künzel, H. J., Braun, A., & Eysholdt, U. (1992). Einfluss von alkohol auf sprache und stimme. Heidelberg: Kriminalistik-Verlag [cited in Künzel (1997)].
82. Ladefoged, P. (1978). Expectation affects identification by listening. UCLA-Working Papers in Phonetics, 41, 41-42.
83. Ladefoged, P., & Ladefoged, J. (1980). The ability of listeners to identify voices. UCLA-Working Papers in Phonetics, 49, 43-51.
84. LaRiviere, C. (1972). Some acoustic and perceptual correlates of speaker identification. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 558-564.
85. Lass, N. J., Mertz, P. J., & Kimmel, K. L. (1978). The effect of temporal speech alterations on speaker race and sex identifications. Language and Speech, 21, 279-290.
86. Laubstein, A. S. (1997). Problems of voice lineups. Forensic Linguistics, 4, 262-279.
87. Lavner, Y., Gath, I., & Rosenhouse, J. (2000). The effects of acoustic modifications on the identification of familiar voices speaking isolated vowels. Speech Communication, 30, 9-26.
88. Legge, G. E., Grossmann, C., & Pieper, C. M. (1984). Learning unfamiliar voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 298-303.
89. Levine, F. J., & Tapp, J. L. (1973). The psychology of criminal identification: The gap from Wade to Kirby. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121, 1079-1131.
90. Loh, W. D. (1981). Perspectives on psychology and law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 314-355.
91. Lown, C. (1977). Legal approaches to juror stereotyping by physical characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 87-100.
92. Mack v. Florida, 44 So. 706 (Fla. 1907).
93. Manitoba. (2001). The inquiry regarding Thomas Sophonow: The investigation, prosecution and consideration of entitlement to compensation. Winnipeg, MB: Department of Justice. Available at www.gov.mb.ca/justice/sophonow/recommendations/english.html
94. Mann, V., Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1979). Development of voice recognition: Parallels with face recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 153-165.
95. Manning, R. K., Fucci, D., & Dean, R. (2000), College-age males’ ability to produce the acoustic properties of an aging voice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 767-771.
96. McAllister, H. A., Bregman, N. J., & Lipscomb, T. J. (1988). Speed estimates by eyewitnesses and earwitnesses: How vulnerable to postevent information? Journal of General Psychology, 115, 25-35.
97. McAllister, H. A., Dale, R. H. I., Bregman, N. J., McCabe, A., & Cotton, C. R. (1993). When eyewitnesses are also earwitnesses: Effects on visual and voice identifications. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 161-170.
98. McAllister, H. A., Dale, R. H., & Keay, C. E. (1993). Effects of lineup modality on witness credibility. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 365-376.
99. McGehee, F. (1937). The reliability of the identification of the human voice. Journal of General Psychology, 17, 249-271.
100. McGehee, F. (1944). An experimental study of voice recognition. Journal of General Psychology, 31, 53-65.
101. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 7, 3-35.
102. Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1991). The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 291-307.
103. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R., & Koehnken, G. (1997). Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews. Memory, 5, 639-656.
104. Memon, A., & Yarmey, A. D. (1999). Earwitness recall and identification: Comparison of the cognitive interview and the structured interview. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 797-807.
105. Meudell, P. R., Northen, B., Snowden, J. S., & Neary, D. (1980). Long term memory for famous voices in amnesic and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 18, 133-139.
106. Muchnik, C., Efrati, M., Nemeth, E., Malin, M., & Hildesheimer, M.(1991). Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. Scandinavian Audiology, 20, 12-23.
107. Murray, T., & Cort, S. (1971). Aural identification of children’s voices. Journal of Auditory Research, 11, 26-262.
108. Neil v. Biggers, 409 US 188 (1972).
109. New Jersey v. Hauptmann, 180 A. 809 (1935).
110. New Jersey Superior Court, Appeal Division, 351 A.2d 787, 789, 1976.
111. Niemeyer, W., & Starlinger, I. (1981). Do the blind hear better? Investigations on auditory processing in congenital or early acquired blindness. Audiology, 20, 12-23.
112. Nolan, F. J. (1996). Speaker recognition and forensic phonetics. In W. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 744-766). Oxford: Blackwell.
113. Nolan, F. J., & Grabe, E. (1996). Preparing a voice lineup. Forensic Linguistics, 7, 74-94.
114. Olsson, N., Juslin, P., & Winman, A. (1998). Realism of confidence in earwitness versus eyewitness identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 101-118.
115. Orchard, T. L., & Yarmey, A. D. (1995). The effects of whispers, voice-sample duration, and voice distinctiveness on criminal speaker identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 249-260.
116. Ormerod, D. (2001). Sounds familiar? Voice identification evidence. Criminal Law Review (October), 95-622.
117. Ormerod, D. (2002). Sounding out expert voice identification. Criminal Law Review (October), 771-790.
118. Papcun, G., Kreiman, J., & Davis, A. (1989). Long-term memory for unfamiliar voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 913-925.
119. Perfect, T. J., Hunt, L. J., & Harris, C. M. (2002). Verbal overshadowing in voice recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 973-980.
120. Peters, D. P. (1987). The impact of naturally occurring stress on children’s memory. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 122-141). New York: Springer-Verlag.
121. Pickel, K. L., French, T. A., & Betts, J. M. (2003). A cross-modal weapon focus effect: The influence of a weapon’s presence on memory for auditory information. Memory, 11, 277-292.
122. Pollack, J., Pickett, J. M., & Sumby, W. H. (1954). On the identification of speakers by voice. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 403-406.
123. Procter, E. E. (2002). The effect of distributed learning on the identification of disguised voices. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
124. Procter, E. E., & Yarmey, A. D. (2003). The effect of distributed learning on the identification of normal-tone and whispered voices. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 13, 17-29.
125. Purnell, T., Idsardi, W., & Baugh, J. (1999). Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 10-24.
126. Rathborn, H., Bull, R., & Clifford, B. R. (1981). Voice recognition over the telephone. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 9, 280-284.
127. Read, J. D., & Craik, F. I. M. (1995). Earwitness identification: Some influences on voice recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 6-18.
128. Regina v. Brownlowe, 7 NSWLR 461 (1987).
129. Regina v. E. J. Smith, [1984] 1 NSWLR 462; (1986) 7 NSWLR 444.
130. Regina v. Morin, 37 C.R. (4th) 395 (Ontario Ct. App. 1995).
131. Reich, A., & Duke, J. (1979). Effects of selected vocal disguises upon speaker identification by listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1023-1028.
132. Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878).
133. Roebuck, R., & Wilding, J. (1993). Effects of vowel variety and sample length on identification of a speaker in a lineup. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 475-481.
134. Rose, P. (2002). Forensic speaker identification. London: Taylor & Francis.
135. Rose, P., & Duncan, S. (1995). Naive auditory identification and discrimination of similar voices by familiar listeners. Forensic Linguistics, 10, 1-17.
136. Ross, D. F., Ceci, S. J., Dunning, D., & Toglia, M. P. (1994). Unconscious transference and lineup identification: Toward a memory blending approach. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 80-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
137. Rothman (1977). A perceptual (aural) and spectographic identification of talkers with similar sounding voices. Proceedings of the International Conference on Crime Countermeasures-Science and Engineering (July) [cited in Rathborn, Bull, & Clifford (1981)].
138. Saslove, H., & Yarmey, A. D. (1980). Long-term auditory memory: Speaker identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 111-116.
139. Scherer, K. R. (1974). Voice quality analysis of American and German speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 281-297.
140. Schichting, F., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (1997). The imitated voice-A problem for voice lineups? Forensic Linguistics, 4, 148-165.
141. Schiller, N. O., & Köster, O. (1996). Evaluation of a foreign speaker in forensic phonetics: A report. Forensic Linguistics, 3, 176-185.
142. Schiller, N. O., & Köster, O, (1998). The ability of expert witnesses to identify voices: A comparison between trained and untrained listeners. Forensic Linguistics, 5, 1-9.
143. Schmidt-Nielsen, A., & Stern, K. R. (1985). Identification of known voices as a function of familiarity and narrow-band coding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 658-663.
144. Schooler, J. W., & Loftus, E. F. (1993). Multiple mechanisms mediate differences in eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility. In J. M. Puckett & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Mechanisms of everyday cognition (pp. 177-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
145. Solan, L. W., & Tiersma, P. M. (2003). Hearing voices: Speaker identification in court. Hastings Law Journal, 54, 373-435.
146. Spence, M. J., & Freeman, M. S. (1996). Newborn infants prefer the maternal low-pass filtered voice, but not the maternal whispered voice. Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 199-212.
147. Spence, M. J., Rollins, P. R., & Jerger, S. (2002). Children’s recognition of cartoon voices. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 214-222.
148. Sporer, S. L. (1982). A brief history of the psychology of testimony. Current Psychological Reviews, 2, 323-340.
149. Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
150. State v. Ferris, 212 Neb. 835, 326, N.W.2d 185 (1982).
151. Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 413-424.
152. Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 302 (1967).
153. Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov
154. Thompson, C. P. (1985). Voice identification: Speaker identifiability and a correction of the record regarding sex effects. Human Learning, 4, 19-27.
155. Thompson, C. P. (1987). A language effect in voice identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 121-131.
156. Tomes, J. L., & Katz, A. N. (1997). Habitual susceptibility to misinformation and individual differences in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 233-251.
157. Tosi, O. (1979). Voice identification: Theory and legal applications. Baltimore: University Park Press.
158. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1-12.
159. Turtle, J., & Watkins, K. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Maximizing information and minimizing errors from witnesses, victims and suspects of crime. In G. M. Chayko & E. D. Gulliver (Eds.), Forensic evidence in Canada (2nd ed., pp. 53-82). Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book.
160. United States v. Duran, 4 F.3d 800 (9th Cir. 1993).
161. United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).
162. van Dommelen, W. A., & Moxness, B. H. (1995). Acoustic parameters in speaker height and weight identifications: Sex-specific behaviour. Language and Speech, 38, 267-287.
163. van Lancker, D., Kreiman, J., & Emmorey, K. (1985a). Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters. Part 1: Recognition of backward voices. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 19-38.
164. van Lancker, D., Kreiman, J., & Wickens, T. D. (1985b). Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters. Part 2: Recognition of rate-altered voices. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 39-52.
165. Vernon, B., & Nelson, E, (2000). Exposure to suggestion and creation of false auditory memories. Psychological Reports, 86, 344-346.
166. Wells, G. L., Ferguson, T. J., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1981).The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 688-696.
167. Wilbur v. Hubbard, 35 Barb. 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 1861).
168. Wilding, J., & Cook, S. (2000). Sex differences and individual consistency in voice identification. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 535-538.
169. Wilding, J., Cook, S., & Davis, J. (2000). Sound familiar? The Psychologist, 13, 558-562.
170. Winograd, E., Kerr, N. H., & Spence, M. J. (1984). Voice recognition: Effects of orienting task, and a test of blind versus sighted listeners. American Journal of Psychology, 97, 57-70.
171. Yamada, N., Hakoda, Y., Yuda, E., & Kusuhara, A. (2000). Verification of impression of voice in relation to occupational categories. Psychological Reports, 86, 1249-1263.
172. Yarmey, A. D. (1986). Verbal, visual and voice identification of a rape suspect under different levels of illumination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 363-370.
173. Yarmey, A. D. (1990). Accuracy and confidence of duration estimates following questions containing marked and unmarked modifiers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1139-1149.
174. Yarmey, A. D. (1991a). Descriptions of distinctive and non-distinctive voices over time. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 31, 421-428.
175. Yarmey, A. D. (1991b). Voice identification over the telephone. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1868-1876.
176. Yarmey, A. D. (1992). The effects of dyadic discussion on earwitness recall. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 251-263.
177. Yarmey, A. D. (1993). Stereotypes and recognition memory for faces and voices of good guys and bad guys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 419-431.
178. Yarmey, A. D. (1994). Earwitness evidence: Memory for a perpetrator’s voice. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
179. Yarmey, A. D. (1995a). Earwitness and evidence obtained by other senses. In R. Bull & D. Carson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 262-273). New York: Wiley.
180. Yarmey, A. D. (1995b). Earwitness speaker identification. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 792-816.
181. Yarmey, A. D. (2000). The older eyewitness. In M. B. Rothman, B. D. Dunlop, & P. Entzel (Eds.), Elders, crime, and the criminal justice system: Myth, perceptions, and reality in the 21st century (pp. 127-148). New York: Springer.
182. Yarmey, A. D. (2001a). Earwitness descriptions and speaker identification. Forensic Linguistics, 8, 113-122.
183. Yarmey, A. D. (2001b). Police investigations. In R. A. Schuller & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Introduction to psychology and law: Canadian perspectives (pp. 59-94). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
184. Yarmey, A. D. (2003a). Earwitness identification over the telephone and in field settings. Forensic Linguistics, 10, 65-77.
185. Yarmey, A. D. (2003b). Eyewitness identification: Guidelines and recommendations for identification procedures in the United States and in Canada. Canadian Psychology, 44, 181-189.
186. Yarmey, A. D., & Matthys, E. (1992). Voice identification of an abductor. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 367-377.
187. Yarmey, A. D., Yarmey, A. L., & Yarmey, M. J. (1994). Face and voice identifications in showups and lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 453-464.
188. Yarmey, A. D., Yarmey, A. L., Yarmey, M. J., & Parliament, L. (2001). Commonsense beliefs and the identification of familiar voices. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 283-299.
189. Yeatman v. Inland Property Management, Inc., 845 F. Supp. 625, 628 (N.D. III. 1994).
190. Yuille, J. C., & Daylen, J. (1998). The impact of traumatic events on eyewitness memory. In C. P. Thompson, D. J. Herrmann, J. D. Read, D. Bruce, G. G. Payne, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 155-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
191. Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. E. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 67-82.