Opinion dynamics: The effect of the number of peers met at once

JASSS

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Urbig, Diemo ^a   Lorenz, Jan ^a   Herzberg, Heiko ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Communication regime; Opinion dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 44349121172     PISSN: 14607425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Amblard, F., & Deffuant, G. (2004). The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics. arXiv:cond-mat/0404574.
2. Ben-Naim, E., Krapivsky, P., Vazquez, F., & Redner, S. (2003). Unity and discord in opinion dynamics. Physica A, 330, 99-106.
3. Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G., & Faure, T. (2002). How can extremism prevail? a study on the relative agreement interaction model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), 5(4).
4. Deffuant, G., Skerratt, S., Amblard, F., Ferrand, N., Chattoe, E., Gilbert, N., & Weisbuch, G. (2001). Improving agri-environmental policies: a simulation approach to the cognitive properties of farmers and institutions. fair3 ct 2092, final report, version 2. (〈http://wwwlisc. clermont.cemagref.fr/ImagesProject/freport.pdf〉)
5. Fortunato, S. (2004, march). The Krause-Hegselmann consensus model with discrete opinions. arXiv :cond-mat/0403670v1.
6. Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models: Analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artifical Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), 5(3).
7. Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2004). Opinion Dynamics Driven by Various Ways of Averaging. Computational Economics, 25(4), 381-405.
8. Jager, W., & Amblard, F. (2004). Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behavior with an agent-based simulation model of attitude change. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10, 295-303.
9. Lorenz, J. (2005). A stabilization theorem for continuous opinion dynamics. Physica A, 355(1), 217-223.
10. Lorenz, J. (2007). Repeated Averaging and Bounded Confidence Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Continuous Opinion Dynamics. Ph.D. thesis at Universität Bremen. (http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46- diss000106688)
11. Lorenz, J., & Urbig, D. (2007). About the power to enforce and prevent consensus by manipulating communication rules. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(2), 251-269.
12. Mason, W A., Conrey, F. R., & Smith, E. R. (2007, August). Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(3), 279-300.
13. Mowen, J. C., & Minor, M. (1998). Consumer behavior. Prentice-Hall.
14. Schweitzer, F., & Holyst, J. A. (2000). Modelling collective opinion formation by means of active brownian particles. The European Physical Journal B, 15, 723-732.
15. Stauffer, D., Sousa, A., & Schulze, C. (2004). Discretized opinion dynamics of the deffuant model on scale-free networks. Journal of Artificial Socienties and Social Simulation (JASSS), 7(3).
16. Urbig, D. (2003). Attitude dynamics with limited verbalisation capabilities. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), 6(1).
17. Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., & Nadal, J. P. (2001). Interacting agents and continuous opinion dynamics (Tech. Rep.). Santa Fe Institute. arXiv:cond-mat/0111494.
18. Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., & Nadal, J. P. (2002). Meet, discuss, and segregate! Complexity, 7(3).