Contextual modulations of center-surround interactions in motion revealed with the motion aftereffect

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2008, Pages

  Tadin, Duje ^a   Paffen, Chris L E ^b   Blake, Randolph ^c   Lappin, Joseph S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Depth; Motion 2D; Perceptual organization; Receptive fields

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 44349117391     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.7.9     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (1999). Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1015-1018.
2. Albright, T. D, & Desimone, R. (1987). Local precision of visuotopic organization in the middle temporal area (MT) of the macaque. Experimental Brain Research, 65, 582-592.
3. Albright, T. D., & Stoner, G. R. (2002). Contextual influences on visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 339-379.
4. Allman, J., Miezin, F., & McGuinness, E. (1985a). Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle, temporal visual area (MT). Perception, 14, 105-126.
5. Allman, J., Miezin, F., & McGuinness, E. (1985b). Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 8, 407-430.
6. Bell, H., Lehmkuhle, S. W., & Westendorf, D. H. (1976). On the relation between visual surround and motion aftereffect velocity. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 13-16.
7. Betts, L. R., Taylor, C. P., Sekuler, A. B., & Bennett, P. J. (2005). Aging reduces center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Neuron, 45, 361-366.
8. Blake, R., & Hiris, E. (1993). Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 33, 1589-1592.
9. Born, R. T., & Bradley, D. C. (2005). Structure and function of visual area MT. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 157-189.
10. Born, R. T., Groh, J. M., Zhao, R., & Lukasewycz, S. J. (2000). Segregation of object and background motion in visual area MT: Effects of microstimulation on eye movements. Neuron, 26, 725-734.
11. Born, R. T., & Tootell, R. B. (1992). Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature, 357, 497-499.
12. Braddick, O. (1993). Segmentation versus integration in visual motion processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 16, 263-268.
13. Bradley, D. C., & Andersen, R. A. (1998). Center-surround antagonism, based on disparity iri primate area MT. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7552-7565.
14. Bradley, D. C., Qian, N., & Andersen, R. A. (1995). lntegration of motion and stereopsis in middle temporal cortical area of macaques. Nature, 373, 604-611.
15. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
16. Bregman, A. L. (1981). Asking the "What for" question in auditory perception. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 99-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Buracas, G. T., & Albright, T. P. (1996). Contribution of area MT to perception of three-dimensional shape: A computational study. Vision Research, 36, 869-887.
18. Cao, A., & Schiller, P. H. (2003). Neural responses to relative speed in the primary visual cortex of rhesus monkey. Visual Neuroscience, 20, 77-84.
19. Cormack, L. K., Stevenson, S. B., & Schor, C. M. (1991). Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing. Vision Research, 31, 2195-2207.
20. Culham, J. C., Nishida, S., Ledgeway, T., Cavanagh, P., von Grunau, M. v., Kwas, M., et al. (1998). Higher order motion aftereffects. In G. Mather, F. A. J. Verstraten, & S. M. Anstis (Eds.), The motion after-effect: A modern perspective (pp. 85-124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Day, R. H., & Strelow, E. (1971). Reduction or disappearance of visual after effect of movement in the absence of patterned surround. Nature, 230, 55-56.
22. DeAngelis, G. C., & Newsome, W. T. (1999). Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT. Journal bf, Neuroscience, 19, 1398-1415.
23. Edwards, M., & Badcock, D. R. (2003). Motion distorts perceived depth. Vision Research, 43, 1799-1804.
24. Falkenberg, H. K., & Bex, P. J. (2007). Contextual modulation of the motion aftereffect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 257-270.
25. Frisby, J. (1979). Seeing: Illusion, brain and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Gautama, T., & Van Hulle, M. M. (2001). Function of center-surround antagonism for motion in visual area MT/V5. A modeling study. Vision Research, 41, 3917-3930.
27. Jones, H. E., Grieve, K. L., Wang, W., & Sillito, A. M. (2001). Surround suppression in primate V1. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2011-2028.
28. Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Pinsk, M. A., Elizondo, M. I., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2001). Modulation of sensory suppression: Implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 1398-1411.
29. Keck, M. J., Palella, T. D., & Pantle, A. (1976). Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research, 16, 187-191.
30. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
31. Lamme, V. A., Supèr, H., & Spekreijse, H. (1998). Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Current Qpinion in Neurobiology, 8, 529-535.
32. Lappin, J. S., Donnelly, M. P., & Kojima, H. (2001). Coherence of early motion signals. Vision Research, 41, 1631-1644.
33. Maunsell, J. H., & Van Essen, D. C. (1983). Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey: II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 1148-1167.
34. Murakami, I., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Modulation of motion aftereffect by surround motion and its dependence on stimulus size and eccentricity. Vision Research, 35, 1835-1844.
35. Nakayama, K., & Loomis, J. M. (1974). Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis. Perception, 3, 63-80.
36. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1991). The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 230-244.
37. Nawrot, M., Shannon, E., & Rizzo, M. (1996). The relative efficacy of cues for two-dimensional shape perception. Vision Research, 36, 1141-1152.
38. Nishida, S., Ashida, H., & Sato, T. (1997). Contrast dependencies of two types of motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 37, 553-563.
39. Pack, C. C., Hunter, J. N., & Born, R. T. (2005). Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1809-1815.
40. Paffen, C. L., Tadin, D., te Pas, S. F., Blake, R., & Verstraten, F. A. (2006). Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 599-604.
41. Paffen, C. L., te Pas, S. F., Kanai, R., van der Smagt, M. J., & Verstraten, F. A. (2004). Center-surround interactions in visual motion processing during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 44, 1635-1639.
42. Paffen, C. L., van der Smagt, M. J., te Pas, S. F., & Verstraten, F. A. (2005). Center-surround inhibition and facilitation as a function of size and contrast at multiple levels of visual motion processing. Journal of Vision, 5(6):8, 571-578, http://journalofvision.org/5/ 6/8/, doi:10.1167/5.6.8.
43. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
44. Raiguel, S., Van Hulle, M. M., Xiao, D. K., Marcar, V. L., & Orban, G. A. (1995). Shape and spatial distribution of receptive fields and antagonistic motion surrounds in the middle temporal area (V5) of the macaque., European Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2064-2082.
45. Rees, G., Friston, K., & Koch, C. (2000). A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 716-723.
46. Regan, D. (1989). Orientation discrimination for objects defined by relative motion and objects defined by luminance contrast. Vision Research, 29, 1389-1400.
47. Regan, D. M. (2000). Human perception of objects. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Press.
48. Rezec, A., Krekelberg, B., & Dobkins, K. R. (2004). Attention enhances adaptability: Evidence from motion adaptation experiments. Vision Research, 44, 3035-3044.
49. Rubin, E. (1915/1958). Figure and ground. In D. C. Beardsley & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 194-203). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
50. Sachtler, W. L., & Zaidi, Q. (1993). Effect of spatial configuration on motion aftereffect. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, and Image Science, 10, 1433-1449.
51. Salzman, C. D., Britten, K. H., & Newsome, W. T. (1990). Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction. Nature, 346, 174-177.
52. Schwartz, B. D., Maron, B. A., Evans, W. J., & Winstead, D. K. (1999). High velocity transient visual processing deficits diminish ability of patients with schizophrenia to recognize objects. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 12, 170-177.
53. Sclar, G., Maunsell, J. H., & Lennie, P. (1990). Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Research, 30, 1-10.
54. Sohn, W., & Seiffert, A. E. (2006). Motion aftereffects specific to surface depth order: beyond binocular disparity. Journal of Vision, 6(2):3, 119-131, http://journalofvision.org/6/2/3/, doi:10.1167/ 6.2.3.
55. Tadin, D., Kim, J., Doop, M. L., Gibson, C., Lappin, J. S., Blake, R., et al. (2006). Weakened center-surround interactions in visual motion processing in schizophrenia. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11403-11412.
56. Tadin, D., & Lappin, J. S. (2005a). Linking psychophysics and physiology of center-surround interactions in visual motion processing. In M. R. M. Jenkin & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Seeing spatial form (pp. 279-314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Tadin, D., & Lappin, J. S. (2005b). Optimal size for perceiving motion decreases with contrast. Vision Research, 45, 2059-2064.
58. Tadin, D., Lappin, J. S., & Blake, R. (2006). Fine temporal properties of center-surround interactions in motion revealed by reverse correlation. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2614-2622.
59. Tadin, D., Lappin, J. S., Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2003). Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature, 424, 312-315.
60. Tanaka, K., Hikosaka, K., Saito, H., Yukie, M., Fukada, Y., & Iwai, E. (1986). Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 134-144.
61. Tittle, J. S., & Braunstein, M. L. (1993). Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 157-169.
62. Tynan, P., & Sekular, R. (1975). Moving visual phantoms: A new contour completion effect. Science, 188, 951-952.
63. van de Grind, W. A., Lankheet, M. J., & Tao, R. (2003). A gain-control model relating nulling results to the duration of dynamic motion aftereffects. Vision Research, 43, 117-133.
64. van der Smagt, M. J., & Stoner, G. R. (2002). Context and the motion aftereffect: Occlusion cues in the test pattern alter perceived direction. Perception, 31, 39-50.
65. van Ee, R., & Anderson, B. L. (2001). Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching. Nature, 410, 690-694.
66. Verstraten, F. A., Verlinde, R., Fredericksen, R. E., & van de Grind, W. A. (1994). A transparent motion aftereffect contingent on binocular disparity. Perception, 23, 1181-1188.
67. von Grünau, M., & Dubé, S. (1992). Comparing local and remote motion aftereffects. Spatial Vision, 6, 303-314.
68. Wade, N. J., Spillmann, L., & Swanston, M. T. (1996). Visual motion aftereffects: Critical adaptation and test conditions. Vision Research, 36, 2167-2175.
69. Wist, E. R., Schrauf, M., & Ehrenstein, W. H. (2000). Dynamic vision based on motion-contrast: Changes with age in adults. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 295-300.
70. Xiao, D. K., Raiguel, S., Marcar, V., Koenderink, J., & Orban, G. A. (1995). Spatial heterogeneity of inhibitory surrounds in the middle temporal visual area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92, 11303-11306.