A maximum likelihood method for an asymmetric MDS model

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 4673-4684

  Saburi, S ^a   Chino, N ^a  

^a AICHI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING; DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; SCALING LAWS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

ASYMMETRIC DATA; ASYMMETRIC MODEL; HYPOTHESIS TESTING;

ASYMPTOTIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 44349111762     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis (2002), Wiley, New York
2. Aitchison J., and Silvey S.D. Maximum-likelihood estimation procedures and associated tests of significance. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 22 (1960) 154-171
3. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B.N., and Csaki F. (Eds). The Second International Symposium on Information Theory (1973), Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 267-281
4. Ashby F.G., and Perrin N.A. Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition. Psychol. Rev. 95 (1988) 124-150
5. Birch M.W. Maximum likelihood in three-way contingency tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 25 (1963) 220-233
6. Bishop Y.M.M., Fienberg S.E., and Holland P.W. Discrete Multivariate Analysis-Theory and Practice (1975), The MIT press, Massachusetts
7. Bock R.D., and Jones L.V. The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice (1968), Holden-Day, San Francisco
8. Bowker A.H. A test for symmetry in contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 43 (1948) 572-574
9. Caussinus H. Contribution à l'analyse statistique des tableaux de corrélation [Contributions to the statistical analysis of correlation matrices]. Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de l'Université de Toulouse 29 (1965) 77-182
10. Chino N. A graphical technique for representing the asymmetric relationships between N objects. Behaviormetrika 5 (1978) 23-40
11. Chino N. A generalized inner product model for the analysis of asymmetry. Behaviormetrika 27 (1990) 25-46
12. Chino, N., Saburi, S., 2006. Tests of symmetry in asymmetric MDS. Paper Presented at the 2nd German Japanese Symposium on Classification. Berlin, March
13. Chino N., and Shiraiwa K. Geometrical structures of some non-distance models for asymmetric MDS. Behaviormetrika 20 (1993) 35-47
14. Constantine A.G., and Gower J.C. Graphical representation of asymmetric matrices. Appl. Statist. 27 (1978) 297-304
15. Cramér H. Mathematical Methods of Statistics (1946), Princeton University Press, Princeton
16. de Leeuw J., and Meulman J. A special jackknife for multidimensional scaling. J. Classif. 3 (1986) 97-112
17. De Rooij M., and Heiser W.J. A distance representation of the quasi-symmetry model and related distance models. In: Yanai H., Okada A., Shigemasu K., Kano Y., and Meulman J.J. (Eds). New Developments in Psychometrics (2003), Springer, Tokyo 487-494
18. De Rooij M., and Heiser W.J. Graphical representations and odds ratios in a distance-association model for the analysis of cross-classified data. Psychometrika 70 (2005) 99-122
19. Escoufier Y., and Grorud A. Analyse factorielle des matrices carrees non symetriques [Factor analysis of square asymmetric matrices]. In: Diday E., et al. (Ed). Data Analysis and Informatics (1980), North-Holland, Amsterdam 263-276
20. Goodman L.A. The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 63 (1968) 1091-1131
21. Goodman L.A. The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries. Ann. Statist. 13 (1985) 10-69
22. Gower J.C. The analysis of asymmetry and orthogonality. In: Barra J.R., Brodeau F., Romer G., and van Cutsem B. (Eds). Recent Developments in Statistics (1977), North-Holland, Amsterdam 109-123
23. Harshman, R.A., 1978. Models for analysis of asymmetrical relationships among N objects or stimuli. Paper presented at the First Joint Meeting of the Psychometric Society and the Society for Mathematical Psychology. Hamilton, Canada
24. Harshman R.A., Green P.E., Wind Y., and Lundy M.E. A model for the analysis of asymmetric data in marketing research. Market. Sci. 1 (1982) 205-242
25. Holman E.W. Monotonic models for asymmetric proximities. J. Math. Psychol. 20 (1979) 1-15
26. Jeffres L.A. The logistic distribution as an approximation to the normal curve. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 53 (1973) 1296
27. Kiers H.A.L., and Takane Y. A generalization of GIPSCAL for the analysis of nonsymmetric data. J. Classif. 11 (1994) 79-99
28. Krumhansl C.L. Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychol. Rev. 85 (1978) 445-463
29. Kruskal J.B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29 (1964) 1-27
30. Kruskal J.B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika 29 (1964) 115-129
31. Kruskal J.B., and Carroll J.D. Geometrical models and badness-of-fit functions. In: Krishnaiah P.K. (Ed). Multivariate Analysis II (1969), Academic Press, New York 639-671
32. Luce R.D. Individual Choice Behavior (1959), Wiley, New York
33. Luce R.D. Detection and recognition. In: Luce R.D., Bush R.R., and Galanter E. (Eds). Handbook of Mathematical Psychology vol. 1 (1963), Wiley, New York 103-189
34. McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12 (1947) 153-157
35. Nosofsky R.M. Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classification. Cognit. Psychol. 23 (1991) 94-140
36. Okada A., and Imaizumi T. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling of asymmetric proximities. Behaviormetrika 21 (1987) 81-96
37. Okada A., and Imaizumi T. Asymmetric multidimensional scaling of two-mode three-way proximities. J. Classif. 14 (1997) 195-224
38. Ramsay J.O. Some small sample results for maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika 45 (1980) 139-144
39. Read C.B. Tests of symmetry in three-way contingency tables. Psychometrika 43 (1978) 409-420
40. Rocci R., and Bove G. Rotation techniques in asymmetric multidimensional scaling. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 11 (2002) 405-419
41. Rushen J. The peck orders of chickens: How do they develop and why are they linear?. Anim. Behav. 30 (1982) 1129-1137
42. Saito T. Analysis of asymmetric proximity matrix by a model of distance and additive terms. Behaviormetrika 29 (1991) 45-60
43. Saito T., and Takeda S. Multidimensional scaling of asymmetric proximity: Model and method. Behaviormetrika 28 (1990) 49-80
44. Sato Y. An analysis of sociometric data by MDS in Minkowski space. In: Matsushita K. (Ed). Statistical Theory and Data Analysis II (1988), North-Holland, Amsterdam 385-396
45. Schönemann P.H., and Carroll R.M. Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion. Psychometrika 35 (1970) 245-255
46. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6 (1978) 461-464
47. Smith J.E.K. Models of identification. In: Nickerson R. (Ed). Attention and Performance VIII (1980), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
48. Stuart A. A test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions in a two-way classification. Biometrika 42 (1955) 412-416
49. Takane Y. Multidimensional successive categories scaling: A maximum likelihood method. Psychometrika 46 (1981) 9-28
50. Takane Y., and Shibayama T. Comparison of models for stimulus recognition data. In: de Leeuw J., Heiser W., Meulman J., and Critchley F. (Eds). Multidimensional Data Analysis (1986), DSWO Press, Leiden 119-138
51. ten Berge J.M.F. Reduction of asymmetry by rank-one matrices. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 24 (1997) 357-366
52. Tobler W. Spatial interaction patterns. J. Environ. Syst. 6 (1976-77) 271-301
53. Torgerson W.S. Theory and Methods of Scaling (1958), Wiley, New York
54. Townsend J.T., and Landon D.E. Mathematical models of recognition and confusion in psychology. Math. Soc. Sci. 4 (1983) 25-71
55. Trendafilov N.T. GIPSCAL revisited. A projected gradient approach. Statist. Comput. 12 (2002) 135-145
56. Wald A. Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 54 (1943) 426-482
57. Weeks D.G., and Bentler P.M. Restricted multidimensional scaling models for asymmetric proximities. Psychometrika 47 (1982) 201-208
58. Winsberg S., and Carroll J.D. A quasi-nonmetric method for multidimensional scaling via an extended Euclidean model. Psychometrika 54 (1989) 217-229
59. Yang Y. Can the strengths of AIC and BIC be shared? A conflict between model indentification and regression estimation. Biometrika 92 (2005) 937-950
60. Young, F.W., 1975. An asymmetric Euclidian model for multi-process asymmetric data. Paper presented at US-Japan Seminar on MDS, San Diego, USA. pp. 79-88
61. Zielman B., and Heiser W.J. Models for asymmetric proximities. Br. J. Math. Statist. Psychol. 49 (1996) 127-146