Acceptance of computer technology: Understanding the user and the organizational characteristics

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1478-1482

  Park, Sung ^a   O'Brien, Marita A ^a   Caine, Kelly E ^a   Rogers, Wendy A ^a   Fisk, Arthur D ^a   Van Ittersum, Koert ^a   Capar, Muge ^a   Parsons, Leonard J ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; PROCESS DESIGN; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ORGANIZATIONAL VARIABLES;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 44349110303     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120605001504     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 361-391.
2. Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Saiam, A. F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41, 731-745.
3. Amoako-Gyampah, K., & A. F. Salam (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41(6), 731-745.
4. Baldridge, J. V., & Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 165.
5. Caine, K. E., O'Brien, M. A., Park, S., Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., Van Ittersum, K., Capar, M. & Parsons, L. J. (In Press). Understanding acceptance of high technology products: 50 years of research. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6. Carroll, J. M. (2002). Human-Computer Interaction, the Past and the Present. In Carroll, J.M. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium. New York: Addison -Wesley.
7. Chao, G. T., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1986). Employee perceptions on the implementation of robotic manufacturing technology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 70-76.
8. Davis Jr., F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
9. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
10. Furnas, G. (2000). Future Design Mindful of the MoRAS. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2/3).
11. Harrison, D. A., Mykytyn Jr., P. P., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (1997). Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 8, 171.
12. Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(5), 359-373.
13. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173.
14. Maxwell, K. (2002). The Maturation of HCI: Moving Beyond Usability toward Holistic Interaction. In Carroll, J.M. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium (191-209). New York: Addison-Wesley.
15. Morris, M. G., & Dillon, A. (1997). The Influence of User Perceptions on Software Utilization: Application and Evaluation of a Theoretical Model of Technology Acceptance. IEEE Software, 14(4), 58.
16. Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 50(3).
17. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186.