Correlation of foot radiographs with foot function as analyzed by plantar pressure distribution

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 249-252

  Thometz, John G ^a,b   Liu, Xue C ^a   Tassone, J Channing ^a   Klein, S ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b Pediatric Orthopaedics   (United States)

Author keywords

Clubfoot; Plantar pressure; Radiographs

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLUBFOOT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FOOT; FOOT RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY;

CHILD; CLUBFOOT; HUMANS; PRESSURE; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 14644388256     PISSN: 02716798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alexander IJ, Chao E, Johnson KA. The assessment of dynamic foot-to-ground contact forces and plantar pressure distribution: a review of the evolution of current techniques and clinical applications. Foot Ankle. 1990;11:152-167.
2. Bennett PJ, Duplock LR. Pressure distribution beneath the human foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993;83:674-678.
3. Bowen TR, Miller F, Castagno P, et al. A method of dynamic foot-pressure measurement for the evaluation of pediatric orthopaedic foot deformities. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:789-793.
4. Bryant AR, Tinley P, Singer KP. Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000;90:295-299.
5. Cavanagh PR, Morag E, Boulton AJ, et al. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech. 1997;30:243-250.
6. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: a thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1995;77:1477-1489.
7. Davitt JS, MacWilliams BA, Armstrong PF. Plantar pressure and radiographic changes after distal calcaneal lengthening in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:70-75.
8. Finch PM. Technology in biomedicine: the EMED pedal pressure measurement system. Foot. 1999;9:1-5.
9. Hee HT, Lee EH, Lee GS, et al. Gait and pedobarographic patterns of surgically treated clubfeet. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2001;40;287-294.
10. Hughes J, Pratt L, Linge K, et al. Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED-F system. Clin Biomech. 1991;6:14-18.
11. Joseph B, Bhatia M, Nair NS. Talo-calcaneal relationship in clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:60-64.
12. Kanatli U, Yetkin H, Cila E. Footprint and radiographic analysis of the foot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:225-228.
13. Lau J, Meyer LC, Lau HC. Results of surgical treatment of talipes equinovarus congenital. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:219-226.
14. Morag E, Cavanagh PR. Structural and functional predictors of regional peak pressures under the foot during walking. J Biomech. 1999;32:359-370.
15. Moses W, Allen BL Jr, Pugh LI, et al. Predictive value of intraoperative clubfoot radiographs on revision rates. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;529-532.
16. Simons GW. Complete subtalar release in clubfeet 11. Comparison with less extensive procedures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1985;67:1056-1065.
17. Simons GW. A standardized method for the radiographic evaluation of clubfeet. Clin Orthop. 1978;135:107-118.
18. Sobel E, Giorgini RJ, Michel R, et al. The natural history and longitudinal study of the surgically corrected clubfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;39: 305-320.
19. Vanderwilde R, Stakeli LT, Chew DE, et al. Measurements of radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1998; 70:407-415.
20. Walker M, Fan H. Relationship between foot pressure pattern and foot type. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:379-383.
21. Widhe T, Berggren L. Gait analysis and dynamic foot pressure in the assessment of treated clubfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:186-190.