Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review

Energy Conversion and Management

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 2178-2199

  Lenzen, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Embodied energy; Fuel cycle; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment; Nuclear energy

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE CYCLE;

EMBODIED ENERGY; FUEL CYCLE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT;

NUCLEAR ENERGY;

EID: 44249121928     PISSN: 01968904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.01.033     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. Pasztor J. What role can nuclear power play in mitigating global warming?. Energy Policy 19 (1991) 98-109
2. Mortimer N. Nuclear power and carbon dioxide - the fallacy of the nuclear industry's new propaganda. The Ecologist 21 3 (1991) 129-132
3. Mortimer N. Nuclear power and global warming. Energy Policy 19 1 (1991) 76-78
4. Donaldson D.M., and Betteridge G.E. Forum - nuclear power and global warming. Energy Policy 19 813-814 (1991) 76-78
5. Uranium Institute. Greenhouse gas emissions from the nuclear fuel cycle. , 2006.
6. Storm van Leeuwen JW, Smith P. Rebuttal of critique of the analysis presented on this website. , Chaam, Netherlands, 2006.
7. Storm van Leeuwen JW. Rebuttal. , Chaam, Netherlands, 2006.
8. Storm van Leeuwen JW. Rebuttal Storm2. , Chaam, Netherlands, 2006.
9. World Nuclear Association. Energy analysis of power systems. Information Paper 11. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2006.
10. School of Physics University of Melbourne. Energy lifecycle of nuclear power. , Melbourne, Australia: School of Physics, University of Melbourne, 2006.
11. Sevior M, Flitney A. Response by Sevior and Flitney in blue. , Melbourne, Australia: School of Physics, University of Melbourne, 2006.
12. Sevior M. Response from Martin Sevior to rebuttal 2 from Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen. , Melbourne, Australia: School of Physics, University of Melbourne, 2006.
13. Perry AM, Devine WD, Reister DB. The energy cost of energy - guidelines for net energy analysis of energy supply systems. Report No. ORAU/IEA(R)-77-14. Oak Ridge, TN, USA: Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, 1977.
14. Herendeen R.A. Net energy considerations. In: West R.E., and Kreith F. (Eds). Economic analysis of solar thermal energy systems (1988), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA 255-273
15. Leach G. Net energy analysis - is it any use?. Energy Policy 3 4 (1975) 332-344
16. Huettner D.A. Net energy analysis: an economic assessment. Science 192 4235 (1976) 101-104
17. Rotty RM, Perry AM, Reister DB. Net energy from nuclear power. IEA Report IEA-75-3. Oak Ridge, TN, USA: Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, 1975.
18. Martinez-Val J.M., and Piera M. Nuclear fission sustainability with hybrid nuclear cycles. Energy Convers. Manage. 48 5 (2007) 1480-1490
19. Uranium Information Centre. World uranium mining. Nuclear issues briefing paper 41. , Melbourne, Australia: Uranium Information Centre, 2006.
20. World Nuclear Association. Uranium mining in Australia and Canada. Education paper. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2006.
21. World Nuclear Association. In situ leach (ISL) mining of uranium. Information paper 03. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2003.
22. Sugo T, Seguchi T, Shimizu T, Uotani M, Kashima R. Evaluation of cost of seawater uranium recovery and technical problems towards implementation (reprinted from Nihon Genshiryoku Gakkaishi 43(10), 2001). In: Andryushin I, Safronov S, Yudin Y, editors, Nuclear technologies and non-proliferation policies. Sarov, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia: Analytical Center for Non-Proliferation, 2004: Issue 13, Annex 8.
23. World Nuclear Association. Supply of uranium. Information paper 75. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2006.
24. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Australian commodity statistics. ABARE project 1059. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, 2004.
25. WISE Uranium Project. Uranium mine ownership - Australia. , Amsterdam, Netherlands: World Information Service on Energy, 2006.
26. Uranium Information Centre. Australia's uranium deposits and prospective mines. , Melbourne, Australia: Uranium Information Centre, 2006.
27. BHP Billiton. Personal communication, 20 October, 2006.
28. WMC Sustainability Site. Olympic dam operations environmental data. , BHP Billiton, 2004.
29. Uranium Information Centre. Australia's uranium mines. , Melbourne, Australia: Uranium Information Centre, 2006.
30. Storm van Leeuwen JW, Smith P. Nuclear power - the energy balance. , Chaam, Netherlands, 2005.
31. Chapman P.F. Energy analysis of nuclear power stations. Energy Policy 3 4 (1974) 285-299
32. Storm van Leeuwen J.W. Nuclear uncertainties - energy loans for fission power. Energy Policy 13 (1985) 253-266
33. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Energy update. 2006.
34. Wagner H-J. The energy cost of building and operating selected energy supply system technologies. Angewandte Systemanalyse Nr. 10, Jül-1561. Jülich, Germany: Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GmbH, 1978.
35. Rössing Uranium Limited. Rössing working for Namibia. Report to Stakeholders. Swakopmund, Namibia: Rössing Uranium Limited, 2004.
36. Energy Resources of Australia Ltd. Social and environment report. , Darwin, NT, Australia: Energy Resources of Australia Ltd, 2003.
37. 2-emissions in fuel extraction. Elektrizitätswirtschaft 89 1/2 (1990) 28-31
38. Taylor M. Greenhouse gas emissions from the nuclear fuel cycle Comparison of energy sources in terms of their full-energy-chain emission factors of greenhouse gases, IAEA Advisory Group meeting/Workshop (1994), International Atomic Energy Agency, Beijing, China 133-137
39. World Nuclear Association. The nuclear fuel cycle. Information paper 03. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2005.
40. Vattenfall. The nuclear fuel cycle. Reference to Vattenfall generation's certified product declarations S-P-00021 and S-P-00026. Stockholm, Sweden: Vattenfall AB Generation Nordic Countries, 2004.
41. World Nuclear Association. Uranium enrichment. Information paper 28. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2006.
42. Australian Coal Association. Electricity from a nuclear power station. Case study B16. Canberra, Australia: Australian Coal Association, 2001.
43. Huber V. Uranium enrichment. , Gronau and Jülich, Germany: URENCO Deutschland GmbH, 2006.
44. Heinloth K. The energy question. Braunschweig (1997), Vieweg, Germany
45. Dones R, Gantner U, Hirschberg S, Doka G, Knoepfel I. Environmental inventories for future electricity supply systems for Switzerland. PSI Bericht Nr. 96-07. Villingen, Switzerland: Paul Scherrer Institut, 1996.
46. Dones R, Bauer C, Bolliger R, Burger B, Heck T, Röder A, Emmenegger MF, Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N. Life cycle inventories of energy systems: results for current systems in Switzerland and other UCTE countries. Data v1.1. Dübendorf, Switzerland: PSI and ESU-services, 2004.
47. Rombourg C.T., and Koen B.V. Total energy investment in nuclear power plants. Nucl. Technol. 26 (1975) 5-11
48. Heinloth K. Energy. Stuttgart, Germany: B.G. Teubner, 1983.
49. Villani S. Progress in uranium enrichment. Naturwissenschaften 71 3 (1984) 115-123
50. Penner P.S., Herendeen R.A., and Milke T. New hybrid 1971 energy intensities available. Energy 4 (1979) 469-473
51. World Nuclear Association. Mixed oxide fuel (MOX). Information paper 29. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2006.
52. World Nuclear Association. Nuclear power reactors. Information paper 32. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2005.
53. White S.W., and Kulcinski G.L. Birth to death analysis of the energy payback ratio and CO2 gas emission rates from coal, fission, wind, and DT-fusion electrical power plants. Fusion Eng Des 48 248 (2000) 473-481
54. Charpentier J.-P. Concerning the necessary energy to make a nuclear reactor. Rev Energie 26 (1975) 892ff
55. Kolb G, Niehaus F, Rath-Nagel S, Voss A. The energy cost for building and operating nuclear power plants. Angewandte Systemanalyse Nr. 10, Jül-1230. Jülich, Germany: Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GmbH, 1975.
56. 2 emission from nuclear power reactor and fuel cycle system Expert workshop on life-cycle analysis of energy systems methods and experience (1992), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, International Energy Agency, Paris, France p. 151-60
57. Walford F.J., Atherton R.S., and Hill K.M. Energy costs of input to nuclear power. Energy Policy 4 2 (1976) 166-170
58. Moraw G., and Szeless A. Energy expense for building and operating power works. Elektrotech Masch 93 7 (1976) 301-303
59. Hohenwarter D.J., and Heindler M. Net power and output of the German LWR nuclear power system. Energy 13 3 (1988) 287-300
60. Chapman P.F. Methods of energy analysis. In: Blair I.M., Jones B.D., and Van Horn A.J. (Eds). Aspects of energy conversion (1976), Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK 739-758
61. Hill K.M., and Walford F.J. Energy analysis of a power generating system. Energy Policy 3 4 (1975) 306-317
62. Tyner G., Costanza R., and Fowler R.G. The net-energy yield of nuclear power. Energy 13 1 (1988) 73-81
63. Lenzen M, Dey C, Hardy C, Bilek M. Life-cycle energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy in Australia. Report to the Prime Minister's Uranium Mining, Processing and nuclear energy review (UMPNER). , Sydney, Australia: ISA, University of Sydney, 2006.
64. Andseta S., Thompson M.J., Jarrell J.P., and Pendergast D.R. CANDU reactors and greenhouse gas emissions. 19th Annual Conference, Canadian Nuclear Society (1998), Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, Canada
65. Lenzen M. Double-counting in frameworks applying life-cycle thinking. J Indu Ecol, 2008, in press.
66. Junker W.H. The nonproliferation program of the UKAEA. ATW 40 4 (1995) 236-238
67. Schwald P., Obst J., Orwantschke D., and Valencia L. Dismantling and removal of Niederaichbach. ATW 40 4 (1995) 242-246
68. Technical Group on Decommissioning. Financial aspects of decommissioning. IAEA-TECDOC-1476. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005.
69. Hewlett J.G. The operating costs and longevity of nuclear power plants. Energy Policy 20 7 (1992) 608-622
70. Thierfeldt S. Release limit for remainder materials. ATW 40 4 (1995) 257-261
71. International Atomic Energy Agency. Nuclear power: an overview in the context of alleviating greenhouse gas emissions. Supporting document to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, IAEA-TECDOC-793. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 1995.
72. Komorowski K., and Meuresch S. Immobilization and back building of core technical units. ATW 40 4 (1995) 231-235
73. Rüdinger V. Removal of nuclear power plant Niederaichbach. ATW 36 12 (1991) 561-564
74. Liebholz W.-M. Green meadow. ATW 40 8/9 (1995) 517
75. International Atomic Energy Agency. Status of the decommissioning of nuclear facilities around the World. STI/PUB/ 1201. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2004.
76. International Atomic Energy Agency. Technical, economic and institutional aspects of regional spent fuel storage facilities. IAEA-TECDOC -1482. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005.
77. World Nuclear Association. Waste management in the nuclear fuel cycle. Information paper 04. , London, UK: World Nuclear Association, 2006.
78. Uranium Information Centre. Environmental rehabilitation of the Mary Kathleen uranium mine. Mines paper # 6. Melbourne, Australia: Uranium Information Centre, 1996.
79. Uranium Information Centre. Environmental management and rehabilitation of the Nabarlek uranium mine. Mines paper # 5. Melbourne, Australia: Uranium Information Centre, 1999.
80. Vattenfall. Certified environmental product declaration of electricity from Forsmark Kraftgrupp AB (FKA). EPD S-P-00021. Stockholm, Sweden: Vattenfall AB Generation Nordic Countries, 2005.
81. AEA Technology. Environmental product declaration of electricity from Torness nuclear power station. London, UK: British Energy, 2005.
82. United Kingdom Nirex Limited. Nirex inputs to environmental product declaration for Torness power station. Technical Note 484461. Harwell, UK: United Kingdom Nirex Limited, 2005.
83. Voorspools K.R., Brouwers E.A., and D'haeseleer W.D. Energy content and indirect greenhouse gas emissions embedded in 'emission-free' plants: results from the Low Countries. Appl Energy 67 (2000) 307-330
84. van de Vate J.F. Full-energy-chain analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from different energy sources Comparison of energy sources in terms of their full-energy-chain emission factors of greenhouse gases. IAEA Advisory Group meeting/Workshop (1994), International Atomic Energy Agency, Beijing, China 11-17
85. Lenzen M., and Dey C.J. Truncation error in embodied energy analyses of basic iron and steel products. Energy 25 (2000) 577-585
86. Lenzen M., and Treloar G. Energy embodied in buildings: wood versus concrete. Energy Policy 30 3 (2002) 249-255
87. Lenzen M., Dey C., and Hamilton C. Climate change. In: Hensher D.A., and Button K.J. (Eds). Handbook of transport and the environment (2003), Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands 37-60
88. Delucchi MA. A revised model of emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-97-22. Davis, CA, USA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, 1997.
89. DeLuchi M.A., Johnston R.A., and Sperling D. Transportation fuels and the greenhouse effect. Transport Res Record 1175 (1988) 33-44
90. DeLuchi M.A. Greenhouse-gas emissions from the use of new fuels for transportation and electricity. Transport Res A 27 3 (1993) 187-191
91. Delucchi M. Emissions of criteria pollutants, toxic air pollutants, and greenhouse gases, from the use of alternative transportation modes and fuels. Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-96-12. Davis, CA, USA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, 1996.
92. Eriksson E., Blinge M., and Lövgren G. Life cycle assessment of the road transport sector. Sci Total Environ 189/190 (1996) 69-76
93. Hannon B., Herendeen R., Puleo F., and Sebald A. Energy, employment and dollar impacts of alternative transportation options. In: Williams R.H. (Ed). The energy conservation papers (1975), Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA, USA 105-130
94. Rose AB. Energy intensity and related parameters of selected transportation modes: freight movements. Report No. ORNL-5554. Oak Ridge, TN, USA: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1979.
95. Schipper L., Scholl L., and Price L. Energy use and carbon emissions from freight in 10 industrialised countries: an analysis of trends from 1973 to 1992. Transport Res D 2 1 (1997) 57-76
96. Schipper L., Peake S., and Marie C. Carbon-dioxide emissions from travel and freight in IEA countries: past and future. Plan Transport Res Comput 413 (1997) 493-518 PTRC Publications
97. Schipper L., Marie-Lilliu C., and Gorham R. Flexing the link between transport and greenhouse gas emissions (2000), International Energy Agency, Paris, France
98. Marheineke T, Friedrich R, Krewitt W. Application of a hybrid-approach to the life cycle inventory analysis of a freight transport task. In: Society of Automotive Engineers, editor. SAE 1998 Transactions - Journal of Passenger Cars. Warrendale, PA, USA: Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 1999.
99. Lenzen M. Total energy and greenhouse gas requirements for Australian transport. Transport Res Part D 4 (1999) 265-290
100. Tokimatsu K., Kosugi T., Asami T., Williams E., and Kaya Y. Evaluation of lifecycle CO2 emissions from the Japanese electric power sector in the 21st century under various nuclear scenarios. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 833-852
101. Fthenakis V.M., and Kim H.C. Greenhouse-gas emissions from solar electric and nuclear power: A life-cycle study. Energy Policy 35 4 (2007) 2549-2557
102. Moraw G., Schneeberger M., and Szeless A. Energy investment in nuclear and solar power plants. Nucl Technol 33 (1977) 174-183
103. Lenzen M. Errors in conventional and input-output-based life-cycle inventories. J Ind Ecol 4 4 (2001) 127-148
104. 2-emission of power plants before and after inventory energy chain. VDI Berichte 1093 (1993) 115-130
105. Dones R., Heck T., and Hirschberg S. Greenhouse gas emissions from energy systems, comparison and overview. Encyclopedia of energy (2004), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
106. Dones R., Hirschberg S., and Knoepfel I. Greenhouse gas emission inventory based on full energy chain analysis. Comparison of energy sources in terms of their full-energy-chain emission factors of greenhouse gases. IAEA Advisory Group meeting/Workshop (1994), Internation Atomic Energy Agency, Beijing, China 95-114
107. van de Vate J.F. Overview of existing studies on full-energy-chain (FENCH) emissions of greenhouse gases. Comparison of energy sources in terms of their full-energy-chain emission factors of greenhouse gases. IAEA Advisory Group meeting/Workshop (1994), International Atomic Energy Agency, Beijing, China 77-84
108. Moore J. The SGHWR. Atom 195 (1973) 7
109. Uchiyama Y. Life cycle analysis of electricity generation and supply systems. Electricity, health and the environment: comparative assessment in support of decision making (1995), International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria p. 279-91
110. Uchiyama Y. Life cycle assessment of electricity generating systems (1999), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
111. Rashad S.M., and Hammad F.H. Nuclear power and the environment: comparative assessment of environmental and health impacts of electricity-generating systems. Appl Energy 65 (2000) 211-229
112. 2 emissions from the full energy chain. In: Planning and economic studies section, editor. Comparison of energy sources in terms of their full-energy-chain emission factors of greenhouse gases, IAEA Advisory Group meeting/Workshop. Beijing, China: International Atomic Energy Agency, 1994, p. 139-50.
113. Friedrich R., and Marheineke T. Life cycle analysis of electricity systems: methods and results. Comparison of energy sources in terms of their full-energy-chain emission factors of greenhouse gases. IAEA Advisory Group meeting/Workshop (1994), International Atomic Energy Agency, Beijing, China 67-75
114. van de Vate J.F. Full-energy-chain analysis of greenhouse gas emissions: a comparison between nuclear power, hydropower, solar power and wind power. Int J Risk Assess Manage 3 1 (2002) 59-74
115. 2 emissions - re-estimation using the latest data and effects of the difference of conditions. CRIEPI Report No. 99009. Tokyo, Japan: Central Research Institute of the Electricity Producing Industry, 2000.
116. Hondo H. Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case. Energy 30 (2005) 2042-2056
117. Hondo H. Personal communication 13 October, 2006.
118. Fthenakis VM. Personal communication 6 October, 2006.
119. 2 analyses of wind turbines - review and applications. Renew Energy 26 3 (2001) 339-362
120. Lenzen M., and Wachsmann U. Wind energy converters in Brazil and Germany: an example for geographical variability in LCA. Appl Energy 77 (2004) 119-130
121. Grum-Schwensen E. Calculation of the energy consumed by the manufacturing and erection of a modern wind generator installation. In: International Atomic Energy Agency, editor. Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the full energy chain of solar and wind power and other energy sources, Working material. Vienna, Austria: IAEA, 1996.
122. Uranium Information Centre. Former Australian uranium mines. , Melbourne, Australia: Uranium Information Centre, 2006.
123. Blake E.M. U.S. capacity factors: leveled off at last. Nucl News 49 6 (2006) 26-31
124. Lenzen M. Greenhouse gas analysis of solar-thermal electricity generation. Sol Energy 65 6 (1999) 353-368