Valuing user external benefits and developing management strategies for metro system underground arcades

Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 103-110

  Lin, Jen Jia ^a   Lo, Chien Wen ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation method; External benefits; Metro system; Negative binomial regression; Underground arcade

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION; COSTS; DESIGN; INVESTMENTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHOPPING CENTERS;

CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD; METRO SYSTEM UNDERGROUND ARCADES; NEGATIVE BINOMIAL REGRESSION;

TUNNELING (EXCAVATION);

CONSTRUCTION; COSTS; DESIGN; INVESTMENTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHOPPING CENTERS; TUNNELING (EXCAVATION);

CONTINGENT VALUATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; INVESTMENT LOCATION; LAND USE PLANNING; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAFETY; STRATEGIC APPROACH; UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; TAIPEI; TAIWAN;

EID: 44249119088     PISSN: 08867798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2006.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Lee M.J., Loomes G., Mourato S., Ozdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., and Swanson J. Economics Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques (2002), Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, UK
2. Cameron A., and Trivedi P. Regression based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson regression model. Journal of Econometrics 46 (1990) 347-364
3. Damigos D., and Kaliampakos D. Assessing the benefits of reclaiming urban quarries: a CVM analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 64 (2002) 249-258
4. Davis, R.K., 1963. The value of outdoor recreation: an economic study of the main woods, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Economics, Harvard University.
5. Eckton G.D.C. Road-user charging and the lake district national park. Journal of Transport Geography 11 4 (2003) 307-317
6. Godard J.P., and Sterling R.L. General considerations in assessing the advantages of using underground space. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 10 3 (1995) 287-297
7. Hanley N., and Spash C.L. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment (1993), Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, England
8. ITA Working Group Number 13, 2004. Underground or aboveground? Making the choice for urban mass transit systems, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 19(1), 3-28.
9. Krieger D.J., and Hoehn J.P. The economics value of reducing environmental health risks:contingent valuation estimates of the value of information. Environmental Management 59 (1999) 25-34
10. Lee C.K., and Han S.Y. Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks' tourism resources using contingent valuation method. Tourism Management 23 (2002) 531-540
11. Long J.S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (1997), Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA
12. Monnikhof R., Edelenbos J., and van der Krogt R. How to determine the necessary for using underground space: an integral assessment method fot strategic decision-making. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 13 2 (1998) 167-172
13. Nishi J., Tanaka T., Seiki T., Ito H., and Okuyama K. Estimation of the value of the internal and external environment in underground space use. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 15 1 (2000) 79-89
14. Ronka K., Ritola J., and Rauhala K. Underground space in land-use planning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 13 1 (1998) 39-49
15. Washington S.P., Karlaftis M.G., and Mannering F.L. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis (2003), Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York