Assessing the benefits of reclaiming urban quarries: A CVM analysis

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 249-258

  Damigos, D ^a   Kaliampakos, D ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Abandoned quarry sites; Contingent Valuation Method; Land rehabilitation; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; PUBLIC POLICY; QUARRYING;

URBAN QUARRIES;

URBAN PLANNING;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; QUARRY; URBAN RENEWAL; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0038080093     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00243-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bateman, I.J., Willis, K.G., 1996. Introduction and overview. In: Bateman, I.J., Willis, K.G. (Eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation method in the US, EU and Developing countries. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 1-16.
2. Bateman, I., Langford, I., Rasbash, J., 1999. Willingness-to-pay question format effects in Contingent Valuation studies. In: Bateman, I.J., Willis, K.G. (Eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation method in the US, EU and Developing countries. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 511-539.
3. Bjornstad, D., Kahn, R., 1996. Characteristics of environmental resources and their relevance for measuring value. In: Bjornstad, D., Kahn, R. (Eds.), The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 3-18.
4. Coller, M., Harrison, G.H., 1995. On the use of the Contingent Valuation Method to estimate environmental costs. In: Reckers, P.M.J. (Ed.), Advances in Accounting, vol. 13. JAP Press, CT, Greenwich.
5. Damigos, D., Kaliampakos, D., 1999. Using Environmental Economics to Evaluate Quarry Rehabilitation Alternatives, 6th GNEST, Samos Island, vol. B, pp. 514-521.
6. David, M., 1977. Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
7. Diamond, P., Hausman, J., 1993. On contingent valuation measurement of nonuse values. In: Hausman, J. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A critical Assessment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 3-38.
8. Diamond, P., Hausman, J., Leonard, G., Denning, M., 1993. Does Contingent Valuation measure preferences? experimental evidence. In: Hausman, J. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 41-90.
9. Harrison, G.W., Kriström, B., 1994. On the interpretation of responses to contingent valuation surveys. In: Johansson, P.O., Kriström, B., Maler, K.G. (Eds.), Current Issues in Environmental Economics. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 35-57.
10. Johansson, P.O., Kriström, B., Maler, K.G., 1994. Introduction. In: Johansson, P.O., Kriström, B., Maler, K.G. (Eds.), Current Issues in Environmental Economics. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 1-9.
11. Kaliampakos D., 1996a. Rehabilitation of abandoned quarry sites: how an expensive activity can be transformed into a beneficial business. IMM Conference: Minerals, Metals and the Environment II, September 3-6, 1996, Prague, Czech Republic.
12. Kaliampakos, D., 1996b. Rehabilitation of Abandoned Quarries Sited in Urban Districts, presented at SWEMP 96, October 7-11, Cagliari, Italy.
13. Kula, E., 1994. Economics of Natural Resources, the Environment and Policies. Chapman and Hall, London.
14. Michael, N., Pearce, D., 1989. Cost-benefit analysis and land reclamation: a case study. LEEC paper 89-02, IIED/UCL. Environmental Economics Centre, London.
15. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1993. Report on the NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58, no. 10, pp. 4602-4614.
16. National Statistics Service of Greece - NSSG, 1991. Population Census of 1991.
17. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2002. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2002/C 151 E/06, p. 132.
18. Pearce, D., Turner, R.K., 1990. Economics Of Natural Resources And The Environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hertfordshire.
19. Pearce, D., Whittington, D., Georgiou, S., Moran. D., 1994. Economic values and the environment in the developing world. Environmental Economics Series, Paper no. 14, United Nations Environment Programme, Environment and Economics Unit.
20. Randall, A., Grunewald, O., Johnson, S., Ausness, R., Pagoulatos, A., 1978. Reclaiming coal surface mines in Central Appalachia: a case study of the benefits and costs. Land Econ. 54, 472-489.
21. Rendu, J.M., 1978. An introduction to geostatistical methods of mineral evaluation. Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, South Africa.
22. Shavell, S., 1993. Contingent Valuation of the nonuse value of natural resources: implications for public policy and the liability system. In: Hausman, J. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 373-388.
23. Turner, R.K., Pearce, D., Bateman I., 1994. Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hertfordshire.
24. Tyrväinen, L., Miettinen, A., 2000. Property prices and urban forest amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 39, 205-233.
25. Tyrväinen, L., Väänänen, H., 1998. The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning 43, 105-118.
26. URBANCO, 1999. A study for the 21 Municipalities of the NE Section of Athens Prefecture. Association for Sustainable Development, Greek.