Spatial substitution patterns in forest recreation

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 81-97

  Termansen, Mette ^a   Zandersen, Marianne ^b   McClean, Colin J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Forest recreation; GIS; Mixed logit; Spatial error components

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY POLICY; GIS; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUBSTITUTION; TOURIST ATTRACTION; TOURIST DESTINATION;

EID: 44249095314     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Babcock B.A., Lakshminarayan J.W., and Zilberman D. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities. Land Economics 73 (1997) 325-339
2. Bateman I.J., and Lovett A.A. Modelling and valuing carbon sequestration in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils. Journal of Environmental Management 60 4 (2000) 301-323
3. Bateman I.J., Garrod G.J., Brainard J.S., and Lovett A.A. Measurement issues in the travel cost method: a geographical information systems approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics 47 (1996) 191-205
4. Bateman I.J., Brainard J.S., and Garrod G.J. The impact of measurement assumptions upon individual travel cost estimates of consumer surplus: a geographical information systems analysis. Regional Environmental Change 1 (1999) 24-30
5. Bateman I.J., Jones A.P., Lovett A.A., Lake I.R., and Day B.H. Applying geographical information systems (GIS) to environmental and resource economics. Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (2002) 219-269
6. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand (1985), The MIT Press, Cambridge
7. Bockstael N.E., Hanemann W.M., and Kling C.L. Estimating the value of water quality improvements in a recreational demand framework. Water Resources Research 23 (1987) 951-960
8. Bockstael N.E., McConnell K.E., and Strand I.E. A random utility model for sports-fishing: some preliminary results of Florida. Marine Resource Economics 6 (1989) 245-260
9. Boxall P.C., Watson D.O., and Englin J. Backcountry recreationists' valuation of forest and park management features in wilderness parks of the western Canadian Shield. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26 (1996) 982-990
10. Breffle W., and Morey E.R. Investigating preference heterogeneity in a repeated discrete choice recreation demand model of Atlantic salmon fishing. Marine Resource Economics 15 (2000) 1-20
11. Buttoud G. How can policy take into consideration the "full value" of forests?. Land Use Policy 17 (2000) 169-175
12. Cameron A.C., and Trivedi P.K. Regression Analysis of Count Data (1998), Cambridge University Press
13. Carl Bro. Befordringsbidrag (1997), Carl Bro Informatik, Copenhagen
14. Chen H.Z., and Cosslett S.R. Environmental quality preference and benefit estimation in multinomial probit models: a simulation approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1998) 512-520
15. Danish Forest and Nature Agency. CRS Register (1997), Danish Ministry of Environment
16. Danish Forest and Nature Agency. Naturnær skovdrift i statsskovene. Hvad, hvordan og hvorfor. (The Danish Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of Environment) (2005)
17. Danish Forest and Nature Agency. God og flersidig skovdrift. Tilskud til foryngelse af skov og driftsplanlægning. (The Danish Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of Environment) (2006)
18. Fletcher J.J., Adamowicz W.L., and Tomasi T. The travel cost model of recreation demand: theoretical and empirical issues. Leisure Science 119 (1990)
19. Greene W.H. LIMDEP Version 8.0. Econometrics Modelling Guide (2002), Econometrics Software, Inc.
20. Greene W.H. LIMDEP version 8.0. Econometric Modeling Guide (2005), Econometric software, Inc.
21. Haab T.C., and McConnell K.E. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources. The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation (2002), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
22. Hanemann W.M. Welfare analysis with discrete choice models. In: Herriges J.A., and Kling C.L. (Eds). Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice (1999), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
23. Hanley N., Shaw W.D., and Wright R.E. The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation (2003), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
24. Hellerstein D., and Mendelson R. A theoretical foundation for count data models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (1993) 604-611
25. Herriges J.A., and Kling C.L. Nonlinear income effects in random utility models. Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (1999) 62-72
26. Herriges J.A., and Phaneuf D.J. Inducing patterns of correlation and substitution in repeated logit models of recreation demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (2002) 1076-1090
27. Hutchinson W.G., Scarpa R., Chilton S.M., and McCallion T. Spatial distribution versus efficiency effects of forest recreation policies: using a regional travel cost model. In: Hanley N., Shaw D., and Wright R. (Eds). The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation (2003), Edward Elgar 139-164
28. Jensen F.S. Friluftsliv i 592 skove og andre natur omraader [Outdoor recreation in 592 forests and other natural areas] (2003), Forskningscentret for skov og landskab, Horsholm, Denmark
29. Jensen F.S., and Koch N.E. Friluftsliv i skovene 1976/77 - 1993/94 (1997), The Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Denmark
30. KMS. VejnetDK [Danish Road Network] (1995), Kort- og Matrikelstyrelsen, Copenhagen
31. Lindhagen A. Forest Recreation in Sweden. Four Case Studies using Quantitative and Qualitative Methods (1996), SLU, Department of Environmental Forestry 1-145
32. McConnell K.E. The economics of outdoor recreation. In: Kneese A.V., and Sweeney J.L. (Eds). Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics (1985), North Holland, Amsterdam 677-722
33. Miljø & Energiministeriet and Danmarks miljøundersøgelse. Areal Informations Systemet [Land Cover Map] (2000), Miljø- og Energiministeriet, Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Copenhagen
34. Miljøministeriet. Danmarks Nationale Skovprogram [Denmarks National Forest Program] (2002), Skov- og Naturstyrelsen {Forest and Nature Agency}, Copenhagen
35. Moeltner K., and Shonkwiler J.S. Correcting for on-site in random utility models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2005) 327-339
36. Morey E.R., Sharma V.R., and Karlstrom A. A simple method of incorporating income effects into logit and nested-logit models: theory and application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (2003) 250-255
37. Núñez D., Nahuelhual L., and Oyarzún C. Forests and water: the value of native temperate forests in supplying water for human consumption. Ecological Economics 58 (2006) 606-616
38. Parsons G.R., and Needelman M.S. Site aggregation in a random utility model of recreation demand. Land Economics 68 (1992) 418-433
39. Provencher B., and Barenklau K.B.R.C. A finite mixture model of recreational angling with serially correlated random utility. American Journal of Agricultural Economics (2002) 1066-1075
40. Romano D., Scarpa R., Spalatro F., and Viganò L. Modeling determinants of participation, number of trips and site choice for outdoor recreation in protected areas. Journal of Agricultural Economics 51 (2000) 224-238
41. Scarpa R., Chilton S.M., Hutchinson W.G., and Boungiorno J. Valuing the recreational benefits from creation of nature reserves in Irish forests. Ecological Economics 33 (2000) 237-250
42. Shannon C.E., and Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication (1949), The University of Illionois, Urbana
43. Shonkwiler J.S., and Shaw W.D. A finite mixture approach to analyzing income effects in random utility models: reservoir recreation along the Columbia river. In: Hanley N., Shaw W.D., and Wright R.E. (Eds). The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation (2003), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 268-279
44. Skov-Petersen H. GIS, Accessibility, and Physical Planning. Exemplified by Models of Recreational Activities (2002), University of Copenhagen
45. Statistics Denmark. Statistisk Årbog 2004,Table 305 (2002)
46. Termansen M., McClean C.J., and Scarpa R. Economic Valuation Combining Mixed Logit and GIS. EAERE Conference, Budapest, Hungary (2004)
47. Termansen M., McClean C.J., and Skov-Petersen H. Recreational site choice modeling using high-resolution spatial data. Environment and Planning A 36 (2004) 1085-1099
48. Train K. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74 (1998) 230-239
49. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press
50. van der Horst D. Spatial cost-benefit thinking in multi-functional forestry: towards a framework for spatial targeting of policy intervention. Ecological Economics 59 1 (2006) 171-180
51. van der Horst D., and Gimona A. Where new farm woodlands support biodiversity action plans: a spatial multicriteria analysis. Biological Conservation 123 (2005) 421-432
52. Vejdirektoratet. Trafikøkonomiske enhedspriser, prisniveau 1999 [Cost of travelling, price index 1999] (2001), Vejdirektoratet, Copenhagen
53. Yen S.T., and Adamowicz W.L. Participation, trip frequency and site choice: a multinomial-Poisson hurdle model of recreation demand. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 42 (1994) 76
54. Zandersen M., and Tol R.S.J. A Meta-Analysis of Forest Recreation Values in Europe. FNU-86 (2005), Hamburg University and Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Science, Hamburg