Demand (and supply) in an inter-district public school choice program

Economics of Education Review

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 402-416

  Reback, Randall ^a  

^a Barnard College of Columbia University   (United States)

Author keywords

Demand for schooling; School choice

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DEMAND ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; STUDENT;

EID: 44149105894     PISSN: 02727757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Armor D.J., and Peiser B.M. Competition in education: A case study of inter-district choice (1997), Pioneer Institute, Boston, MA
2. Barrow L. School choice through relocation: Evidence from the Washington DC area. Journal of Public Economics 86 2 (2002) 155-189
3. Bayer, P., Ferreira, F., McMillan, R. (2004). Tiebout sorting, social multipliers and the demand for school quality. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10871.
4. Belfield, C. R., Levin, H. M., Schwartz, H. L. (2004). School choice and the supply of private schooling places: Evidence from the Milwaukee parental choice program. Occasional Paper No. 84, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, 〈www.ncspe.org〉.
5. Bierlein L., Sheane K., and Mulholland L. A national review of open enrollment/choice: Debates and description (1993), Morrison Institute, Arizona State University
6. Black S.E. Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 2 (1999) 577-600
7. Brown, C. G. (2004). Choosing better schools: A report on student transfers under the No Child Left Behind Act. In D. M. Piché, W. L. Taylor (Eds.). Citizens' Commission Civil Rights, 〈http://www.cccr.org/ChoosingBetterSchools.pdf〉.
8. Campbell D.E., West M.R., and Peterson P.E. Participation in a national, means-tested school voucher program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24 3 (2005) 523-541
9. Clark D. Politics, markets, and schools: Quasi-experimental evidence on the impact of autonomy and competition from a truly revolutionary UK reform (2005), mimeo, University of Florida
10. Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B., Levitt, S. (2003). The effect of school choice on student outcomes: Evidence from randomized lotteries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10113.
11. Cullen J.B., Jacob B., and Levitt S. The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of Chicago public schools. Journal of Public Economics 89 5-6 (2005) 729-760
12. Downes T.A., and Zabel J.E. The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991. Journal of Urban Economics 52 1 (2002) 1-25
13. Education Commission of the States. (2005). Open enrollment: 50 state report. 〈http://mb2.ecs.org/reports/Report.aspx?id=268〉.
14. Figlio D., and Lucas M. What's in a grade? School report cards and house prices. American Economic Review 94 3 (2004) 591-604
15. Fossey R. Open enrollment in Massachusetts: Why families choose. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 16 3 (1994) 320-334
16. Fowler F.C. Participation in Ohio's interdistrict open enrollment option: Exploring the supply-side of choice. Educational Policy 10 5 (1996) 518-536
17. Hastings, J. S., Kane, T. J., Staiger, D. O. (2005). Parental preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 11805.
18. Henig J. Choice in public schools: An analysis of transfer requests in magnet schools. Social Science Quarterly 71 1 (1990) 69-82
19. Jacob, B. A., Lefgren, L. (2005). What do parents value in education: An empirical investigation of parents' revealed preferences for teachers. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 11494.
20. Lankford H., and Wyckoff J. The effect of school choice and residential location on the racial segregation of students (2000), University at Albany, SUNY, mimeo, Rockefeller College
21. Palmer, E. A. (2003). 'This Choice is Yours' after two years: An evaluation. Aspen Associates, submitted to and disseminated by the Minnesota Department of Education.
22. Reback R. House prices and the provision of local public services: Capitalization under school choice programs. Journal of Urban Economics 57 2 (2005) 275-301
23. Reback, R. (2006). Demand (and supply) in an inter-district public school choice program. Barnard College Working Paper 05-01. 〈http://cedar.barnard.columbia.edu/working_papers/wp0501.pdf〉.
24. Schneider M., and Buckley J. What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 2 (2002) 133-144
25. School District Profiles, 1999-2000 (2002). Minnesota department of families, children, and learning (now called Minnesota Department of Education).
26. Schools and Staffing Survey 1993-1994. National center for education statistics (1994), US Department of Education, Washington, DC
27. Wells A.S. Time to choose: America at the crossroads of school choice policy (1993), Hill & Wang, New York, NY