Participation in a national, means-tested school voucher program

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 523-541

  Campbell, David E ^a   West, Martin R ^b   Peterson, Paul E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144464848     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20113     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2000). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
2. Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. (2004). The great divide: Home purchase mortgage lending nationally and in 115 metropolitan areas. Retrieved December 21, 2004, from http://www.acorn.org/fileadmin/ACORN_Reports/ hmda2004/Great_Divide_2004.pdf
3. Barnard, J., Frangakis, C., Hill, J., & Rubin, D. (2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 299-323.
4. Betts, J. R., & Fairlie, R. W. (2001). Explaining ethnic, racial, and immigrant differences in Private school attendance. Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 26-51.
5. Black, S. E. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 577-599.
6. Boehm, T. P., & Schlottmann, A. M. (2004). The dynamics of race, income and homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 55, 113-130.
7. Buddin, R. J., Cordes, J. J., & Kirby, S. N. (1998). School choice in California: Who chooses private schools? Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 110-134.
8. Campbell, D. E. (2001). Making democratic education work. In P. E. Peterson & D. E. Campbell (Eds.), Charters, vouchers, and public education (pp. 241-267). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1992). School choice: A special report. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
10. Chakrabarti, R. (2004). Impact of voucher design on public school performance: Evidence from Florida and Milwaukee voucher programs. Manuscript, Harvard University.
11. Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing vs. the internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Manuscript, Ohio State University.
12. Chiswick, B. R., & Koutroumanes, S. (1996). An econometric analysis of the demand for private schooling. Research in Labor Economics, 15, 109-237.
13. Cobb, C. W. (1992). Responsive schools, renewed communities. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
14. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
15. Coons, J. E., & Sugarman, S. D. (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Coulson, A. J. (1999). Market education: The unknown history. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
17. Education Commission of the States. (2003). Policy brief: Vouchers, tax credits and tax deductions. Retrieved December 21, 2004, from http://www.ecs.org
18. Epple, D., & Romano, R. (2003). Neighborhood schools, choice, and the distribution of educational benefits. In C.M. Hoxby (Ed.), The economics of school choice (pp. 227-286). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Fairlie, R. W., & Resch, A. M. (2002). Is there "White flight" into private schools? Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 21-33.
20. Farley, R. (1991). Residential segregation of social and economic groups among Blacks. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 235-273). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
21. Fernandez, R., & Rogerson, R. (2003). School vouchers as a redistributive device: An analysis of three alternative systems. In C.M. Hoxby (Ed.), The economics of school choice (pp. 145-226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Figlio, D. N., & Stone, J. A. (1999). School choice and student performance: Are private schools really better? Research in Labor Economics 18, 115-140.
23. Fuller, B., & Elmore, R. (Eds.). (1996). Who chooses, who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Geolytics, Inc. (2002). CensusCD 1990 (Release 1.1). East Brunswick, NJ: Geolytics.
25. Godwin, K. R., & Kemerer, F. R. (2002). School choice tradeoffs: Liberty, equity, and diversity. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
26. Greene, J. P. (1998). Civic values in public and private schools. In P. E. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice (pp. 83-106). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27. Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Henig, J. R. (1996). The local dynamics of choice. In B. Fuller & R. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses, who loses: Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 95-117). New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Howell, W. G. (2004). Dynamic selection effects in a means-tested, urban school voucher program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 225-250.
31. Howell, W. G., Peterson, P. E., Wolf, P. J., & Campbell, D. E. (2002). The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
32. Hoxby, C. M. (2003). Introduction. In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), The economics of school choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Jencks, C. (1979). Who gets ahead? The determinants of economic success in America. New York: Basic Books.
34. Kane, T., Riegg, S., & Staiger, D. (2003). Changing school assignments and housing values. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. (Typescript).
35. Lankford, R. H., & Wykoff, J. H. (2001). Who would be left behind by enhanced private school choice? Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 288-312.
36. Long, J. E., & Toma, E. F. (1988). The determinants of private school attendance, 1970-1980. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 351-357.
37. Metcalf, K. K., West, S. E., Legan, N. A., Paul, K. M., & Boone, J. (2003). Evaluation of the Cleveland scholarship and tutoring program. Bloomington, IN: School of Education, Indiana University
38. Moe, T. M. (2001). Schools, vouchers, and the American public. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
39. Nechyba, T. J. (2003). Introducing school choice into multidistrict public school systems. In C. Hoxby (Ed), The economics of school choice (pp. 145-194). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Peterson, P. E., Campbell, D. E., & West, M. R. (2002). Who chooses? Who uses? Participation in a national school voucher program. In Paul T. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
41. Phillips, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P., & Crane, J. (1998). Family background, parenting practices, and the Black-White test score gap. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 103-148). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
42. Sacerdote, B. (2004). What happens when we randomly assign children to families? Working Paper 10984. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
43. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. U.S. Department of Education. (2002a). Schools and staffing survey, 1999-2000: Overview of the data for public, private, public charter, and Bureau of Indian Affairs elementary and secondary schools. NCES 2002-313. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
45. U.S. Department of Education. (2002b). Common core of data. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved December 21, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd
46. Witte, J. F. (1991). First year report: Milwaukee parental choice program. Department of Political Science and the Robert M. La Follette Institute of Public Affairs. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
47. Witte, J. F. (2000). The market approach to education: An analysis of America's first voucher program. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Wolf, P. J., Greene, J. P., Kleitz, B., & Thalhammer, K. (2001). Private schooling and political tolerance. In P. E. Peterson & D. E. Campbell (Eds.), Charters, vouchers, and public education (pp. 268-290). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
49. Wolf, P. J., Macedo, S., Ferrero, D. J., & Venegoni, C. (Eds.). (2004). Educating citizens: International perspectives on civic values and school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
50. Wolfe, A. (Ed). (2003). School choice: The moral debate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, et al. 536 US 639 (2002).