Sixty-four-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of functionally significant coronary stenoses in patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 311-318

  Nicol, Edward D ^a   Stirrup, James ^a   Reyes, Eliana ^a   Roughton, Michael ^a   Padley, Simon P G ^a   Rubens, Michael B ^a   Underwood, S Richard ^a  

^a ROYAL BROMPTON AND HAREFIELD NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE; LIPID; TETROFOSMIN TC 99M;

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; HYPERTENSION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 44149093502     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C.A., Runza G., McFadden E.P., Baks T., et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112 (2005) 2318-2323
2. Muhlenbruch G., Seyfarth T., Soo C.S., Pregalathan N., and Mahnken A.H. Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 603-609
3. Gershlick A.H., de Belder M., Chambers J., Hackett D., Keal R., Kelion A., et al. Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: An assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group. Heart 93 (2007) 423-431
4. Hendel R.C., Patel M.R., Kramer C.M., Poon M., Hendel R.C., Carr J.C., et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1475-1497
5. Miller D.D., and Shaw L.J. Volatility in the diagnostic markets: Is there a "new economy" of testing?. J Nucl Cardiol 8 (2001) 616-619
6. Klocke F.J., Baird M.G., Lorell B.H., Bateman T.M., Messer J.V., Berman D.S., et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinicaluse of cardiac radionuclide imaging-Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003) 1318-1333
7. Underwood S.R., Godman B., Salyani S., Ogle J.R., and Ell P.J. Economics of myocardial perfusion imaging in Europe-The EMPIRE Study. Eur Heart J 20 (1999) 157-166
8. Beller G.A., and Zaret B.L. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 101 (2000) 1465-1478
9. Kelion A.D., Anagnostopoulos C., Harbinson M., Underwood S.R., Metcalfe M., and British Nuclear Cardiology Society. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the UK: Insights from the British Nuclear Cardiology Society Survey 2000. Heart 91 Suppl 4 (2005) iv2-iv5
10. Gulenchyn KY, McEwan AJ, Freeman M, Kiess M, O'Neill BJ, Beanlands RS, et al. Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to cardiovascular nuclear imaging. Can J Cardiol 200;22:827-33.
11. Anagnostopoulos C., Davies G., Flint J., Harbinson M., Hilson A., Kelion A., et al. Setting up a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy service: Clinical and business aspects. Heart 91 Suppl 4 (2005) iv6-iv14
12. Pryor D.B., Harrell F.E., Lee K.L., Califf R.M., and Rosati R.A. Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Med 75 (1983) 771-780
13. Anagnostopoulos C., Harbinson M., Kelion A., Kundley K., Loong C.Y., Notghi A., et al. Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Nucl Med Commun 24 (2003) 1105-1119
14. Cerqueira M., Weissman N., Dilsizian V., Jacobs A.K., Kaul S., Laskey W.K., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105 (2002) 539-542
15. Agatston A.S., Janowitz W.R., Hildner F.J., Zusmer N.R., Viamonte Jr. M., and Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 5 (1990) 827-832
16. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., Frye R.L., Gensini G.G., Gott V.L., Griffith L.S., et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51 Suppl 4 (1975) 5-40
17. Ropers D., Rixe J., Anders K., Kuttner A., Baum U., Bautz W., et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- × 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97 (2006) 343-348
18. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., and Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
19. Gaemperli O., Schepis T., Koepfli P., Valenta I., Soyka J., Leschka S., et al. Accuracy of 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionally relevant coronary stenoses as assessed with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34 (2007) 1162-1171
20. Schuijf J.D., Wijns W., Jukema J.W., Atsma D.E., de Roos A., Lamb H.J., et al. Relationship between non-invasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 2515-2517
21. Miller T.D., Hodge D.O., Milavetz J.J., and Gibbons R.J. A normal stress SPECT scan is an effective gatekeeper for coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 14 (2007) 187-193
22. Schuijf J.D., Wijns W., Jukema J.W., Decramer I., Atsma D.E., de Roos A., et al. A comparative regional analysis of coronary atherosclerosis and calcium score on multislice CT versus myocardial perfusion on SPECT. J Nucl Med 47 (2006) 1749-1755
23. Schuijf J.D., Wijns W., Jukema J.W., Atsma D.E., de Roos A., Lamb H.J., et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 2508-2514
24. Leber A.W., Knez A., von Ziegler F., Becker A., Nikolaou K., Paul S., et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 147-154