Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: An assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 423-431

  Gershlick, A H ^a   De Belder, Mark ^b   Chambers, J ^c   Hackett, D ^d   Keal, Richard ^e   Kelion, A ^f   Neubauer, S ^g   Pennell, D J ^h   Rothman, Martin ⁱ   Signy, M ^j   Wilde, P ^k  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d Hemel Hempstead General Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^e GLENFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f HAREFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ LONDON CHEST HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^j WORTHING HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^k BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIANGINA PECTORIS AGENT;

ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ATHEROMATOSIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; GOLD STANDARD; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CARDIOLOGY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY CARE UNITS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; EXERCISE TEST; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FORECASTING; HEALTH MANPOWER; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34247329383     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.108779     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Smith LDR, Spyer G, Dean JW. Audit of cardiac catheterisation in a district general hospital: implications for training. Heart 1999;81:461-4.
2. Boulton BD, Bashir Y, Ormerod OJ, et al. Cardiac catheterisation performed by a clinical nurse specialist. Heart 1997;78:194-7.
3. Pilote L, Miller DP, Califf RM, et al. Determinants of the use of coronary angiography and revascularisation after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1996;17:1198-205.
4. Mark DB, Naylor CD, Hlatky MA, et al. Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1130-5.
5. Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med 2004;31:261-91.
6. Hachamovitch R, Hayes S, Friedman JD, et al. Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: What is the warranty period of a normal scan? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1329-40.
7. Ladenheim ML, Pollock BH, Rozanski A, et al. Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:464-71.
8. Sharir T, Germano G, Kang X, et al. Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction. J Nucl Med 2001;42:831-7.
9. Geleijnse ML, Elhendy A. Can stress echocardiography compete with perfusion scintigraphy in the detection of coronary artery disease and cardiac risk assessment? Eur J Echocardiogr 2000;1:12-21.
10. Elhendy A, Arruda AM, Mahoney, et al. Prognostic stratification of diabetic patients by exercise echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1551-7.
11. Marwick TH, Case C, Sawada S, et al. Prediction of mortality using dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:754-60.
12. Bax JJ, Wijns W, Cornel JH, et al. Accuracy of currently available techniques for prediction of functional recovery after revascularisation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic disease: comparison of pooled data. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1451-60.
13. Senior R, Kaul S, Lahiri A. Myocardial viability on echocardiography predicts long-term survival after revascularisation in patients with ischaemic congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1848-54.
14. Afridi I, Grayburn PA, Panza JA, et al. Myocardial viability during dobutamine echocardiography predicts survival in patients with coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:921-6.
15. Johansen A, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Christensen HW, et al. Effect of coronary revascularisation for stable angina pectoris predicted by myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1363-70.
16. Kang X, Berman DS, Lewin HC, et al. Comparative localization of myocardial ischemia by exercise electrocardiography and myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:140-5.
17. Senior R, Khattar R, Lahiri A. Value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am J Cardiol 1998;81:298-301.
18. Mor-Avi V, Sugeng L, Weinert L, et al. Fast measurement of left ventricular mass with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2004;110:1814-18.
19. Hackett D. The British Cardiac Society. Cardiac workforce requirements in the UK (2005). http://www.bcs.com/pages/full_news.asp?NewsID= 1764.
20. Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Johansen A, Christensen HW, et al. Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without post-test referral bias. Eur Heart J 2006;27:29-34.
21. A McCully RB, Roger VL, Mahoney DW, et al. Outcome after normal exercise echocardiography and predictors of subsequent cardiac events: follow-up of 1,325 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:144-9.
22. B Sicari R, Pasanisi E, Venneri L, et al. Stress echo results predict mortality: a large-scale multicenter prospective international study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:589-95.
23. C Chung G, Krishnamani R, Senior R. Prognostic value of normal stress echocardiogram in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A British general hospital experience. Int J Cardiol 2004;94:181-6.
24. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of the European Society of Cardiology. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report, Eur Heart J 2004;25:1940-65.
25. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-53.
26. Selvanayagam JB, Kardos A, Francis JM, et al. Value of delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in predicting myocardial viability after surgical revascularization. Circulation 2004;110:1535-41.
27. Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1657-65.
28. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 2004;110:732-7.
29. Green JD, Omary RA, Schirf BE, et al. Catheter-directed contrast-enhanced coronary MR angiography in swine using magnetization-prepared True-FISP. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1317-21.
30. Olsson LE, Chai CM, Axelsson O, et al. MR coronary angiography in pigs with intraarterial injections of a hyperpolarized (13)C substance. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:731-7.
31. Dick AJ, Raman VK, Raval AN, et al. Invasive human magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility during revascularization in a combined XMR suite. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2005;64:265-74.
32. Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Nehrke K, et al. Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2313- 19.
33. Dickfeld T, Kato R, Zviman M, et al. Characterization of radiofrequency ablation lesions with gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:370-8.
34. Juergens KU, Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCTEur. Radiology 2006;16:342-357.
35. Schmerund A, Erbel R. Non-invasive computed tomographic coronary angiography: the end of the beginning. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1451-3.
36. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7.
37. Thomas GF, Cynthia HM, Herbert B, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system Eur Radiol 2006;16:256-68.
38. Thomson LE, Hachamovitch R. Coronary artery calcium scoring using electron-beam computed tomography: where does this test fit into a clinical practice? Rev Cardiovasc Med 2002;3:121-8.
39. While CS, Kuo D, Kelemen M, et al. Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:533-40.