Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges with Two-Column Bents

Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 134, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 495-504

  Zhong, Jinquan ^a   Gardoni, Palo ^a   Rosowsky, David ^a   Haukaas, Terje ^b  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Bridges; Columns; Concrete; Deformation.; Seismic effects; Structural reliability

Indexed keywords

COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; RANDOM PROCESSES; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; STATISTICAL METHODS;

GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS; PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC DEMAND MODELS;

BRIDGES;

BRIDGES; COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; RANDOM PROCESSES; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BRIDGE; COLUMN; DEFORMATION; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; PEAK ACCELERATION; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

AGROSTIS;

EID: 43949131756     PISSN: 07339399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:6(495)     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1996). "Improved seismic design criteria for California bridges." Applied Technology Council Rep. No. ATC-32, Palo Alto, Calif.
2. Box, G. E. P., and Tiao, G. C. (1992). Baysian inference in statistical analysis, Wiley, New York.
3. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (1999). Seismic design criteria, 1.1 Ed., California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
4. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2006). Seismic design criteria, 1.4 Ed., California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
5. Choe, D. E., Gardoni, P., and Rosowsky, D. (2007). "Closed-form fragility estimates, parameter sensitivity and Bayesian updating for RC columns." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT0733-939910.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:7(833), 133(7), 833-843.
6. Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K. (1999). "Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems." Rep. No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
7. Fajfar, P. (2000). "A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design." Earthquake Spectra EASPEF8755-293010.1193/1.1586128, 16(3), 573-592.
8. Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M. (1987). "Nonlinear seismic analysis of RC buildings: Implications of a case study." Eur. Earthquake Eng. EEENEZ0394-5103, 1, 31-43.
9. Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M. (1988). "N2-A method for nonlinear seismic analysis of regular buildings." Proc., 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Maruzen, Tokyo, 111-116.
10. Fajfar, P., Gašperšič, P., and Drobnič, D. (1997). "A simplified nonlinear method for seismic damage analysis of structures." Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 183-194.
11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), NEHRP. (1997). "Commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings." FEMA 274, Washington, D.C.Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), NEHRP. (1997). "Commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings." FEMA 274, Washington, D.C.
12. Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2002). "Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for RC columns based on experimental observations." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT0733-939910.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024), 128(10), 1024-1038.
13. Gardoni, P., Khalid, M. M., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2003). "Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges." J. Earthquake Eng. ZZZZZZ1363-2469, 7(1), 79-106.
14. Haukaas, T., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2004). "Finite-element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based earthquake engineering." Rep. No. PEER 2003/14, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
15. Kunnath, S. K. (2007). "Application of the PEER PBEE methodology to the I-880 viaduct." Rep. No. PEER 2006/10, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
16. McKenna, F., and Fenves, G. L. (2002). "The OpenSees command language primer." Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
17. Moore, J. M. (2000). "Shake table testing of two column bent with hinged bases." Master thesis, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, Nev.
18. Moustafa, K. (2004). "Impact of aspect ratio on two-column bent seismic performance." Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, Nev.
19. Nada, H. M. (2003). "Seismic performance of RC bridge frames with architectural-flared columns." Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, Nev.
20. Somerville, P., and Collins, N. (2002). "Ground motion time histories for the I880 bridge, Oakland, prepared for the PEER methodology tested project." URS Corporation, Pasadana, Calif. 〈http://www.peertestbeds.net/i-880.htm〉
21. Trifunac, M. D., and Brady, A. G. (1975). "On the correlation of seismic intensity with peaks of recorded strong ground motion." Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. BSSAAP0037-1106, 65, 139-162.