Accounting for bias and boundary condition effects on measurements of saturated core hydraulic conductivity

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 750-757

  Madsen, Matthew D ^a,b   Chandler, David G ^a,c   Reynolds, W Daniel ^d  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Kansas State University   (United States)

^d HARROW RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; LINEAR REGRESSION; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; SOIL SURVEYS;

FLUX DENSITY; HEAD GRADIENT; SAND COLUMNS;

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LINEAR REGRESSION; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; SOIL SURVEYS;

CLAY LOAM; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC HEAD; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PERMEABILITY; SOIL WATER;

EID: 43949130746     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0254     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ASTM. 2003. Standard D 5084: Standard test methods for measurement of conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM Int., West Conshohocken, PA.
2. Basile, A., G. Ciollaro, and A. Coppola. 2003. Hysteresis in soil-water characteristics as a key to interpreting comparisons of laboratory and field measured hydraulic properties. Water Resour. Res. 39(12):1355, doi:10.1029/2003WR002432.
3. Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York.
4. Bootlink, H.W.G., and J. Bouma. 2002. Steady flow column method. p. 812-817. In J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI.
5. Borcher, C.A., J. Skopp, D. Watts, and J. Schepers. 1987. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity determination for fine-textuted soils. Trans. ASAE 30:1038-1042.
6. Chan, H.T., and T.C. Kenney. 1973. Laborarory investigation of the permeability ratio of New Liskeard varved soil. Can. Geotech. J. 10:453-472.
7. Dane, J.H. 1980. Comparison of field and laboratory determined hydraulic conductivity values. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:228-231.
8. Darcy, H. 1856. Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon. Dalmont, Paris.
9. Dirksen, C. 1999. Soil physics measurements. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen, Germany.
10. Fuentes, J.P., and M. Flury. 2005. Hydraulic conductivity of a silt loam soil as affected by sample length. Trans. ASAE 48:191-196.
11. Gee, G.W., and D. Or. 2002. Particle-size analysis. p. 255-289. In J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI.
12. Gerke, H.H. 2006. Preferential flow descriptions for structured soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 169:382-400.
13. Gupta, R.P., and D. Swartzendruber. 1962. Flow-associated reduction in the hydraulic conductivity of quartz sand. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 26:6-10.
14. Hansbo, S. 1960. Consolidation of clay with special reference to the influence of vertical sand drains. Proc. 18. Swedish Geotech. Inst., Stockholm.
15. Hansbo, S. 2003. Deviation from Darcy's law observed in one-dimensional consolidation. Geotechnique 53:601-605.
16. Hillel, D. 1998. Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, San Diego.
17. Hubbert, M.K. 1956. Darcy's law and the field equations of flow of underground fluids. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng. 207:222-239.
18. Lal, R., and M.J. Shukla. 2004. Principles of soil physics. Marcel Dekker, New York.
19. Lebron, I., M.D. Madsen, D.G. Chandler, D.A. Robinson, O. Wendroth, and J. Belnap. 2007. Ecohydrological controls on soil moisture and hydraulic conductivity within a pinyon-juniper woodland. Water Resour. Res. 43:W08422, doi:10.1029/2006WR005398.
20. Miller, R.J., and P.F. Low. 1963. Threshold gradient for water flow in clay systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27:605-609.
21. Mitchell, J.K. 1993. Fundamentals of soil behavior. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
22. Mitchell, J.K., and J.S. Younger. 1967. Abnormalities in hydraulic flow through fine-grained soils. ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 417:106-141.
23. Olsen, H.W. 1965. Deviations from Darcy's law in saturated clays. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29:135-140.
24. Reynolds, W.D., and D.E. Elrick. 2002. Constant head soil core (tank) method. p. 804-808. In J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI.
25. Sato, K., T. Masunaga, and T. Wakatsuki. 2005. Water movement characteristics in a multi-soil-layering system. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 51:75-82.
26. Schulz, K., R. Seppelt, E. Zehe, H.J. Vogel, and S. Attinger. 2006. Importance of spatial structures in advancing hydrological sciences. Water Resour. Res. 42:W03S03, doi:10.1029/2005WR004301.
27. Skjemstad, J.O., and J.A. Baldock. 2007. Total and organic carbon. In M.R. Carter and E.G. Gregorich (ed.) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
28. Smiles, D.E., and M.J. Rosenthal. 1968. The movement of water in swelling materials. Aust. J. Soil Res. 6:237-248.
29. Swartzendruber, D. 1968. The applicability of Darcy's law. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32:11-18.
30. Troyer, W., and J. Skopp. 2002. Rapid water flow instrumentation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:107-111.
31. Vanderborght, J., R. Kasteel, and H. Vereecken. 2006. Stochastic continuum transport equations for field-scale solute transport: Overview of Theoretical and experimental results. Vadose Zone J. 5:184-203.
32. Walkley, A., and I.A. Black. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: Effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci. 63:251-263.
33. Wessolek, C., R. Plagge, F.J. Leij, and M.Th. van Genuchten. 1994. Analyzing problems in describing field and laboratoty measured soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma 64:93-110.
34. Zhang, F., R. Zhang, and S. Kang. 2003. Estimating temperature effects on water flow in variably saturated soils using activation energy. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:1327-1333.